Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Hahaha fucking hell
Hahaha fucking hellYeah but the truth is they can't answer things to the point, always swerve swerve swerve
You mean the global worldwide recession?Remind me who was at fault for the recession fool
Certainly becoming a liability.
It is times like this when you find out if a dog with a red lead would get voted in to some seats. It has been a Labour seat since it started in the 50's.
I'll be honest, if I woke up in the morning and read this pair were dead I wouldn't give a single fuck.
Perhaps a little disappointed they never made it to the Hague but I'll save my sympathy for people who have died due to their religion driven war mongering ideology.
I don’t suppose too many would shed a tear for a Jew hating leader of the Labour Party who also supported an organisation that murdered members of Parliament either but it’s not the point is it
He rushed to condemn the Tory one Tony put up. Couldn't stop him posting about it.Isn't it? It's faux outrage for the sake of point scoring.
He rushed to condemn the Tory one Tony put up. Couldn't stop him posting about it.
While we get our knickers in a twist about Tweets posted many years ago, sometimes before people were adults, we miss stories such as this:
Minister must quit - rape trial 'sabotage' victim
or this:
Tory MP quits after 'grope' claim by Labour MP
I don’t suppose too many would shed a tear for a Jew hating leader of the Labour Party who also supported an organisation that murdered members of Parliament either but it’s not the point is it
He rushed to condemn the Tory one Tony put up. Couldn't stop him posting about it.
While we get our knickers in a twist about Tweets posted many years ago, sometimes before people were adults, we miss stories such as this:
Minister must quit - rape trial 'sabotage' victim
or this:
Tory MP quits after 'grope' claim by Labour MP
Jew hating.... do me a favour. He’s done more to support Jewish people in his time in parliament than nearly everyone else in there. Take a look at his voting and parliamentary record.
Then again - facts aren’t something you deal with.... just hyperbole.
Precisely zero people jumped on the Rees-Mogg stuff when it was posted up.Don't get me wrong, this woman sounds unsuitable for politics!
But we've have Rees mogg comments today, the suppression of the Russia investigation yet this woman's comments have caused so much outrage even though one of the men she's spoken of is hated on here.
It's absolute bollocks.
Precisely zero people jumped on the Rees-Mogg stuff when it was posted up.
Don't get me wrong, this woman sounds unsuitable for politics!
But we've have Rees mogg comments today, the suppression of the Russia investigation yet this woman's comments have caused so much outrage even though one of the men she's spoken of is hated on here.
It's absolute bollocks.
I see you rushed to condemn it. Along with the Gower Tory candidate. And as for the sleaze allegations against Tories, they've been thge first to be posted up here by you.loads have on national media and TV
The initial comments were bad enough but then claiming he hadn't said it rather than apologise just made it worse. Then to top it all Andrew Bridgen has been on the radio doing everything he can to make it worse!But we've have Rees mogg comments today, the suppression of the Russia investigation yet this woman's comments have caused so much outrage even though one of the men she's spoken of is hated on here.
loads have on national media and TV
And on here all these morally outraged people jumped on it.To be fair on media it has been widely reported, and although he has apologised I think it says a lot about his opinion of the average person which will shock absolutely no-one.
I see you rushed to condemn it. Along with the Gower Tory candidate. And as for the sleaze allegations against Tories, they've been thge first to be posted up here by you.
Oh, and good to see you rushed to condemn the fakery of political documents too.
I'm almost in danger of doing an Astute and asking where your objectivity is - although tbf you've never claimed to be objective (and nor should you be, for that matter!)
Christ that’s not scraping the barrel but looking underneath it
Oh I’m sorry.... are you suggesting that the news source is not credible?
Source?I’d say that anyone who was prepared to take thousands of pounds off a state sponsored Arab TV station that is a known advocate of Jewish hate and encouraging violence against Jews is not too keen even if he picked up a paper bag outside a synagogue once
Source?
Source for what?
The bollocks you’ve just spouted.
what the fact he was paid for appearing on Al Jazeera or the fact it’s an anti Jewish station?
Anything will be a start...
So that’s a no then.well if you want evidence the news channel isn’t then I’m afraid it says a lot about you - it’s like asking if Hitler wasn’t that keen on “them” if it’s the other look at his statements of payments which are all on line
So that’s a no then.
I’m aghast and disturbed you are denying this
Al Jazeera Anti-Semitic Video Controversy Nothing New for Radical Network | National Review
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?