clint van damme
Well-Known Member
just looked him up. He was against drinking and wanking, abhorrent views that have no place in society.
Don't know why, but somehow I always knew this .
Umbongo, umbongoWhat is supposed to be the issue with Coco Pops? It uses a cartoon monkey who's just meant to be a monkey surely.
Smash is racist to aliens.
In that case, the clangers was racist as well. I don't know why, I just feel in the current climate that it is.Smash is racist to aliens.
They promote racism according to a certain former Labour MP
just looked him up. He was against drinking and wanking, abhorrent views that have no place in society.
Drinking and driving I get. Drinking and wanking I don't. Unless you're doing it while driving. Or in the pub.
Yup. Should be identified and arrested if there is a case to prove.Its still being overlooked that a group of people were going to kill that bloke until he was saved.
Of course they did a good thing saving him but the "violent thugs" seem to be a one way thing still. He wasn't pulled from a river, people were stamping on him to kill him.
Yup. Should be identified and arrested if there is a case to prove.
A thug is a thug.
NoAm I the only person whose seen The Road To Welville
Its still being overlooked that a group of people were going to kill that bloke until he was saved.
Of course they did a good thing saving him but the "violent thugs" seem to be a one way thing still. He wasn't pulled from a river, people were stamping on him to kill him.
This is really all down to the media and how they want to spin things all of the time.
is it?
I saw this fella interviewed and also his boss (runs some security firm) who organised for them to go to the demo.
His boos said he took some of his men there because they could see the younger lads were angry and likely to do something stupid and they wanted to calm things down. He didn't gloss over that there was violence and that in all likelihood there would of been more.
The interview was on national TV so I'm not sure it's been overlooked.
I don't mean the actual people who rescued them, they are being honest and come across very well. I meant more the media / press.
However look at how it's reported and compare it to the 2 lads with a knife chased in Coventry.
Yeah I know he has been very honest and humble. I just meant how it's then portrayed in the press when they then pass the story.I don't disagree about the Coventry incident.
But if one of the people involved in the London incident goes on national TV and admits there was violence then I don't see how that is ignoring it.
I read an interview with Patrick Hutchinson in the Guardian as well and he's fairly candid though he doesn't really use the word violence to describe what the younger lads were up to those he doesn't have a go at the right wing protestors either so he was being fairly diplomatic.
Its still being overlooked that a group of people were going to kill that bloke until he was saved.
Of course they did a good thing saving him but the "violent thugs" seem to be a one way thing still. He wasn't pulled from a river, people were stamping on him to kill him.
This is really all down to the media and how they want to spin things all of the time.
The people that attacked the bloke definitely need arresting, charging and locking up for a long time for the violent attack. However, I think it's going a bit far to say they were trying to kill him. That's not to say either that if there hadn't been an intervention the attack may have resulted in him dying as we all know it can just take one punch or bad fall from one to kill somebody but we've seen similar vidoes before from Saturday nights with fights occurring and people being stamped - it doesn't mean it is their intention to kill them but 'give them a kicking'.
It's a load of stupid people who don't have the forethought to consider the possible outcomes of their actions. This isn't excusing their behaviour and as I say they should be jailed but I do think a distinction should be made on the intent.
Not being funny but anybody that kicks somebody in the head when they are on the floor should be done for attempted murder.
It would mean hundreds of people around the country being up for attempted murder every week after weekend nights out though or 'football' hooligans.
Nothing wrong with that.
It would make people thing harder about what they're doing and would potentially massively reduce this kind of thing happening. Short term it would lead to a massive backlog in the courts and a lot of people complaining about draconian measures etc. But it probably is time for a bit of 'tough love' to improve behaviour of the feral few.
Yes, I think so. For that one reason.Is it?
Yes.Think it's a difference in the interpretation of the meaning of shocking.
Otis means it in a 'digusting' kind of way rather than a 'surprising'
We need to start treating all people as equals and apparently God loves everyone, so the congregation should be happy to accept anyone of their faith to lead their church. If he is a good person of course.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?