13 managers in 14 years. It's ridiculous and clearly doesn't work
Try something different let him build his own team to suit his playing philosophy
Personally I think that TM should be given that time.
13 managers in 14 years. It's ridiculous and clearly doesn't work
Try something different let him build his own team to suit his playing philosophy
Agree RE the start of next season. But I'll be so pissed off if we start like we've ended this season and someone has to inherit someone else's team and try and make it workOnce managers enter a slump in form they rarely manage to turn their fortunes around.
One things for certain - if we start next season as we are finishing this one his position becomes untenable.
It's all very well blathering on about football philosophy and attractive football but fans ultimately want one thing - winning football.
Mowbray has two tasks - promotion and getting fans in the ground - at the minute he is failing on both counts. One thing Anderson is responsible for is the budget and that will be on crowds of 9,000 next year unless something changes quickly.
Once managers enter a slump in form they rarely manage to turn their fortunes around.
One things for certain - if we start next season as we are finishing this one his position becomes untenable.
It's all very well blathering on about football philosophy and attractive football but fans ultimately want one thing - winning football.
Mowbray has two tasks - promotion and getting fans in the ground - at the minute he is failing on both counts. One thing Anderson is responsible for is the budget and that will be on crowds of 9,000 next year unless something changes quickly.
Agree. Had we sacked Thorn I am convinced we would have stayed up.
We should have sacked Coleman after the 4-1 away at Charlton last day of the season. Only the width of a post stopped us going down that year.
Thing is with Barnsley, the word was that during the poor run they were playing well, but losing. They kept playing well and turned it round.Not sure that this is true. Can't remember how many games Barnsley lost in a row earlier in the season, stuck with their manager and turned it around so much so he was poached by Bristol. Loads of other examples. Problem these days is that managers are given no time at all to build, hence we have a manager who won't move his family and prefers to live 200 miles away from Coventry. Who can blame him. At some point we have to stick with someone and give them a chance. TM plays football the right way. His teams try to score and play with flair. Yes, I want a winning team but I also want to be entertained too. I remember with much more fondness the Fergie, Wallace team of the late 70's than I do the functional Noël Cantwell team that got us into Europe. Jimmy Hill, Gordon Milne, Eric Black and TM- good, Don Howe, Aidy Boothroyd and Pressley last season generally bad. Results overall probably not too different. The style of play however is cheese to chalk. I think that given time Mowbray will deliver an exciting and winning team. Fortunately From what he says, Anderson seems to agree that TM will be given time.
With us we went from playing well to not playing well.
Where was that word coming from then? I'm a member on some UK football forums and the Barnsley fans on their were suicidal at the time and wanted the manager out.Thing is with Barnsley, the word was that during the poor run they were playing well, but losing. They kept playing well and turned it round.
With us we went from playing well to not playing well.
If we had carried on playing well but losing I would have 100% believed we would turn it round too.
I thought they were alright against us and unlucky to lose.Where was that word coming from then? I'm a member on some UK football forums and the Barnsley fans on their were suicidal at the time and wanted the manager out.
I can also confirm that they were one of the worse teams to visit the Ricoh this season and didn't play well that day.
They were dogshit against us, they were fortunate we gifted them the goals otherwise they'd have been smashed 4-0.I thought they were alright against us and unlucky to lose.
When we played the game, CWR had someone from Barnsley in the commentary box for an interview (think it might have been the local reporter who reported on all their games) and he said that Barnsley had been playing really well but just not getting the results.
Not surprised at all if Barnsley fans were suicidal if they were losing every week. We'd be the same.
Where was that word coming from then? I'm a member on some UK football forums and the Barnsley fans on their were suicidal at the time and wanted the manager out.
I can also confirm that they were one of the worse teams to visit the Ricoh this season and didn't play well that day.
Thing is with Barnsley, the word was that during the poor run they were playing well, but losing. They kept playing well and turned it round.
With us we went from playing well to not playing well.
If we had carried on playing well but losing I would have 100% believed we would turn it round too.
Can only tell you what he was saying. Pretty certain it didn't come across as just his view either.They were dogshit against us, they were fortunate we gifted them the goals otherwise they'd have been smashed 4-0.
I didn't hear what you did on the radio but I wouldn't place much credibility on what they say, our idiot reporters probably say similar when asked about how we are playing.
They had 17 points after the first 19 games, that isn't a team who have played well and been unlucky. Its a team who were shit for almost half the season.
Only if our shooting had been a lot more accurate.I would have been worried if I was a Barnsley fan that day at the Ricoh
We played very well on Friday and were very unlucky to lose.
Okay that game another ten times with the same chances to both teams we would win most times
Ok well he was wrongCan only tell you what he was saying. Pretty certain it didn't come across as just his view either.
It was obviously some months back now.
Only if our shooting had been a lot more accurate.
That pretty much mirrors our current form 19 points from our last 20 games. We're a team who are shit for almost half a season.They were dogshit against us, they were fortunate we gifted them the goals otherwise they'd have been smashed 4-0.
I didn't hear what you did on the radio but I wouldn't place much credibility on what they say, our idiot reporters probably say similar when asked about how we are playing.
They had 17 points after the first 19 games, that isn't a team who have played well and been unlucky. Its a team who were shit for almost half the season.
Exactly, because we've played poor like Barnsley did for the first half of the season.That pretty much mirrors our current form 19 points from our last 20 games. We're a team who are shit for almost half a season.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I wouldnt put too much credence in what their local media write, ours are just as bullish when we have a good result, we were going to storm back into the play offs after the Bury game.No exactly the same without their keeper having the game of his life......
POSH REACTION: Awesome Alnwick was the star man for Peterborough United
Alnwick’s heroics kept Coventry at bay during a one-sided first-half in front of the live Sky TV cameras
Goalkeeper Ben Alwnick was by far and away the best Peterborough United player in their 3-1 League One win over Coventry at the ABAX Stadium tonight (March 25
Ben Alnwick: Superb display. Posh would have been dead an buried in the opening quarter, but for a string of great saves. Caught his crosses well and a deserved winner of the man-of-the-match award. Outstanding 9
Read more: http://m.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/sp...r-peterborough-united-1-7297775#ixzz447jFGxP2
I'm not one for sacking Mowbray, but what should we judge him on - the first 17 games or the last 20 games? (More of a rhetorical question than aimed at you ccfc)Exactly, because we've played poor like Barnsley did for the first half of the season.
If we were playing well we'd have turned it around by now just like if Barnsley were playing well in the first half of the season they would have turned it around before half the season had passed.
I wouldnt put too much credence in what their local media write, ours are just as bullish when we have a good result, we were going to storm back into the play offs after the Bury game.
Their keeper had a game but none of his saves were worldies. Our finishing was poor. I'm sure he's made better saves in his career than the ones he made on Friday. In fact RCC has made better saves than those this season.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
And the Nationals?
After being outplayed in the first half, Alnwick repeatedly came to their rescue with seven fine saves, chiefly from Jacob Murphy, who also hit the post after the break.
BBC
Was that the one for the camera where he could have caught it but went for the slow motion one handed punch?And the Nationals?
After being outplayed in the first half, Alnwick repeatedly came to their rescue with seven fine saves, chiefly from Jacob Murphy, who also hit the post after the break.
BBC
Not convinced we've played well consistently all season.
We had good games, started on fire for the first three but... it's been fits and spurts, beyond that.
Could be argued Mowbray had he team punching above its weight early, and now we're reverting to the norm.
Name which saves you wouldnt expect a keeper to save? I'd have expected RCC to save everyone of those, that's what keepers get paid for.And the Nationals?
After being outplayed in the first half, Alnwick repeatedly came to their rescue with seven fine saves, chiefly from Jacob Murphy, who also hit the post after the break.
BBC
You right any goalkeeper of any or no ability would have saved all of them.Name one save you wouldn't have expected him to make.
I agree with a lot this but the "if reda hadn't got injured line..." He was always going to get injured, great player when fit but hasn't managed to play half a season for the last 6-7 years so was always going to get inured at some point , TM knew this when he re-signed him in the summer.Its a good question, if the runs had been the opposite way around and the last 20 games had been the first 20, its possible he may not even be here.
We've seen a big improvement this season from last and look set for a top half finish after almost going down last season, he's improved and stabilsed our league position and we are in no danger of going down so gets a tick for that.
I think the fact that we've had a lot of disruptions in the team, particularly in defence with Martin, Stokes, Reda (Our 3 best defenders over the season) is a big reason as to why we've fallen off. Had Reda not got injured I have a feeling we'd still be in the play offs, can't really use that as an excuse though as well all knew he would get injured at some point. The big challenge in the summer will be to replace Reda with another defender with the same qualities who has a much better injury record.
On the assumption we will still be in league 1 next year play offs has to be the minimum next season and will be the time to judge him.
Don does like his spinI wouldnt put too much credence in what their local media write, ours are just as bullish when we have a good result, we were going to storm back into the play offs after the Bury game.
Their keeper had a game but none of his saves were worldies. Our finishing was poor. I'm sure he's made better saves in his career than the ones he made on Friday. In fact RCC has made better saves than those this season.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Which is exactly why I followed it up withI agree with a lot this but the "if reda hadn't got injured line..." He was always going to get injured, great player when fit but hasn't managed to play half a season for the last 6-7 years so was always going to get inured at some point , TM knew this when he re-signed him in the summer.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Yep, exactly.Name one save you wouldn't have expected him to make.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?