Johhny Blue
Well-Known Member
I should have scrolled further. I’ve voted now. No goal
I should have scrolled further. I’ve voted now. No goalThose stills don’t prove that it was in. Live I was sure the ref was going to give it. When it wasn’t given I begrudgingly accepted that it hadn’t crossed the line.
Ignoring the ball and seeing how far the defender is from the line seems that the ball should be over when it hits him.
I wonder if the watch was checked post game or if we’ll ever know.
Bottom line. We lost and it’s lucky it wouldn’t have been an equalizer or winner.
I decided I’m not sure enough either way to vote but gut feeling is it didn’t cross the line.
the still is not the furthest it went you weird lesta weirdoWhere has it been pointed out that I'm wrong? The technology gives a scientific yes or no answer to a goal. The answer is no as the whole ball has not crossed the line. Its very simple
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
hawkeye of the ball after it rolled back derekThe results of hawkeye are above on this thread from the side
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Why would the hawkeye be a flawed picture but the grainy twitter picture be 100% spot on? Mate let it go. We were shite and the ball wasn't over the lineit's a flawed picture you halfwitted lesta twat
And Gyokeres is given more often than not IMOHow was the Tavares one not? I thought the Hyam one was as well.
because the shot given was wrongSo you reckon the EFL has chosen to only screenshot after the ball goes back in contact with the line.
Why?
And Gyokeres is given more often than not IMO
But why have they chosen to do that instead of given the point where you think it would show a goal?because the shot given was wrong
Because the hawkeye picture is after it hits there player and rolls backwardsWhy would the hawkeye be a flawed picture but the grainy twitter picture be 100% spot on? Mate let it go. We were shite and the ball wasn't over the line
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Not said anyone is gaming anyone, just the tech failed.But why have they chosen to do that instead of given the point where you think it would show a goal?
What are the EFL gaining from cheating this goal away?
If the tech failed why have they released a Hawkeye showing it not to be a goal? What are they gaining from it?Not said anyone is gaming anyone, just the tech failed.
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Serious question.
Why doesn't the Hawkeye footage show the rugby line?
David I can see you're understandably frustrated given ours and the referees performance so I'll leave it there. They don't just make the technology up from any random picture. Once the ball crosses the line completely the refs watch buzzes and tells him it's over the line. At no point did this happenBecause the hawkeye picture is after it hits there player and rolls backwards
Did you go to school
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Because the still taken is after it hits their player and rolls back towards the line.If the tech failed why have they released a Hawkeye showing it not to be a goal? What are they gaining from it?
LolI've never really been in an argument with David O'Day before and think people take it too far with the stuff they say about him, but maybe I was wrong. Lunatic.
Wow etc
I've never really been in an argument with David O'Day before and think people take it too far with the stuff they say about him, but maybe I was wrong. Lunatic.
Wow etc
Bevause it’s reconstructed. It likely works off a virtual line based on the base of the goal posts calibrated on set up not on the actual painted lines.
Then why haven't they released the still where the ball is over the line?Because the still taken is after it hits their player and rolls back towards the line.
We didn't deserve anything but wow
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
you're asking the wrong personThen why haven't they released the still where the ball is over the line?
Which makes it worse for me. The image shows the ball on the line by a blade or two of grass.
Every chance those two blades of grass aren't even white.
who the fuck are youWas gonna post exactly the same
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then the paint would be wrong technically.
I think the whole ball whole line thing is a stupid rule but it is the rule.
the ball rolls backwards before they free it thanks i winYou can see the video here. The still image is taken at the correct time.
Unbelievably close but no goal.
You can see the video here. The still image is taken at the correct time.
Unbelievably close but no goal.
So for arguments sake, if the whole ball over the line thing is stupid, where do you draw the line?
the only alternative is to go the way of other sports and go any of the ball crosses the line because that is the only other one that can be definitely proven. Most of the ball is too subjective.So for arguments sake, if the whole ball over the line thing is stupid, where do you draw the line?
Middle of the line for me. It’s not logical, just feels wrong to me.
wowOh look at that, the ball was in the air bouncing up and down. Just like it clearly was in the original dodgy angled video.
it hits their player and rolls back before they freeze frame it in that videoOh look at that, the ball was in the air bouncing up and down. Just like it clearly was in the original dodgy angled video.
Hang on, middle of the line on the pitch or middle of the ball?
it hits their player and rolls back before they freeze frame it in that video
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?