I don't see how we would reject anything around 20 million. I just hope it includes a loan backWhat’s all this talk about Gyokeres leaving in January owner prospective new owner has said clearly no players are to be sold in January, don’t you believe him.
I don't see how we would reject anything around 20 million. I just hope it includes a loan back
Harsh assessment on the face of it.Mate why do u even bother replying. No one respects your views on Scottish football. You have been outed as bias to Celtic many times.
The curse of literalism strikes againWhat’s all this talk about Gyokeres leaving in January owner prospective new owner has said clearly no players are to be sold in January, don’t you believe him.
What is?Harsh assessment on the face of it.
Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
Agreed, no question, He started both of Sweden's recent international friendly wins. He played just over the hour against Mexico and 84 minutes in the 2-0 win over Algeria getting an assist. Should be on a beach somewhere by now. PUSBBest all round forward to play for us at Championship level since premier league relegation ? Discuss
I'm talking performance wise at this level
Unplayable at times , like an old fashioned 9 , so hard to play against
Can't be any better ?
No it's not. He said rangers were shit while they won league and made massive strides in Europe for a Scottish team aswell.What you said.
Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
I was referring solely to your reply to David O'Day's post, which was "He's really not a good player, he's really fat and mostly a sub for the worst Rangers team in years." Allowing for a little exaggeration, that's hardly contentious stuff.No it's not. He said rangers were shit while they won league and made massive strides in Europe for a Scottish team aswell.
Then he admitted he supports Celtic and has never said a good word about rangers
Like shmee says it ruins any football talk for those that don't support a Scottish team on here
Yep, two absolute shite teams in a pub league.Hate it when the fake Rangers fans and the fake Celtic fans bring their bullshit on here. Go post it on their forums.
Probably just the length of them though, doubt we had planned on them for the long termAren't all 3 already on pretty decent new contracts?
I remember when I looked at the leagues and saw Burnley in the wastelands. Little team with a bit of history.With Dougie's heavy pockets making cash flow a little better in January is there a chance we could offer new contracts to Vik, Gus & O'Hare?
I'm not mad enough to think all 3 of them wouldn't jump ship to Prem teams or even the likes of Burnley. But if we say to each of them you aren't going anywhere in January regardless. Then offer each a new contract on slightly better wages but include a promise that they can leave if a bigger team comes in with an appropriate offer in the summer if they still want to leave?
Keeping all 3 would massively boost the odds of sneaking playoffs but I'm just thinking that we if we could tie them in to longer contracts we would be protected in being able to maximize profits.
With at least a 25% sell on.I don't see how we would reject anything around 20 million. I just hope it includes a loan back
Aren't all 3 already on pretty decent new contracts?
If we want to challenge for top six or more we have to keep them until the summer, selling any they have to be replaced and newbies have to fit the system which is working straight away.With Dougie's heavy pockets making cash flow a little better in January is there a chance we could offer new contracts to Vik, Gus & O'Hare?
I'm not mad enough to think all 3 of them wouldn't jump ship to Prem teams or even the likes of Burnley. But if we say to each of them you aren't going anywhere in January regardless. Then offer each a new contract on slightly better wages but include a promise that they can leave if a bigger team comes in with an appropriate offer in the summer if they still want to leave?
Keeping all 3 would massively boost the odds of sneaking playoffs but I'm just thinking that we if we could tie them in to longer contracts we would be protected in being able to maximize profits.
Had a dream last night we sold him to Burnley for £12.5m with £2.5m on promotion.
you've been outed as a thick c**t and no one respects your views on anything so do you bother posting?Mate why do u even bother replying. No one respects your views on Scottish football. You have been outed as bias to Celtic many times.
No love lost there, then.you've been outed as a thick c**t and no one respects your views on anything so do you bother posting?
still other people agree he is pretty fat and mostly a sub for a piss poor rangers team
nah, i made a valid point and he took a swing at meNo love lost there, then.
Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
All will only have a year left by the start of next season I believe.Aren't all 3 already on pretty decent new contracts?
It’s hard isn’t it for us to consider everything from the players perspective. I love yok and so long as we receive an inflated figure and get to reinvest in other players then thank you for the memories. If it’s anyone in the championship get lost and If it’s a forest get lost tooIf we have serious ambitions of getting promotion this season then he surely has to stay. If he is promised that if we don’t make it, he can leave in the summer, I think he would go for that.
Who in their right mind would want to play under poison dwarf Nathan Jones?
Would only be for the money haha
Good comeback if I wasn't universally known as the best poster on here.you've been outed as a thick c**t and no one respects your views on anything so do you bother posting?
still other people agree he is pretty fat and mostly a sub for a piss poor rangers team
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?