Warwickhunt
Well-Known Member
if he was a true penalty taker then he would get 100% one on ones past the goalkeepers, its all to do with a calm persona that gives you the ability to take pens
if he was a true penalty taker then he would get 100% one on ones past the goalkeepers, its all to do with a calm persona that gives you the ability to take pensLove Gyökeres, best forward we have had in a few years... But
Utter dogshite at penalties!
Thought he had turned a corner with that one against WBA but nope.
Is it 2/4 so far?
Seems far from natural to him. that one against Rotherham trickled in
If I was a Prem scout I'd rip up my notes and look elsewhere
Them scouse on toffee army think they'll get him for £5M.
Yes - as long as half was invested back into the squad.20m is the fee waved about on twitter. Would anyone else accept that?
the reason it wont be 5m or 10m but 15m + is in a straight auction, there are 4 or 5 teams who would pay that
20m is the fee waved about on twitter. Would anyone else accept that?
Yes - as long as half was invested back into the squad.
Yeah it really isI'd take 20m if they invested £5m in the squad, balanced the books for the next few years and rebuilt the academy/training ground.
£20m is a huge sum.
the reason it wont be 5m or 10m but 15m + is in a straight auction, there are 4 or 5 teams who would pay that
Disagree. Hyam was a panic sale because we kept the 'big 3' and had serious cashflow issues. If argue he isn't worth much more than a couple £m anyway.
Gyökeres on the other hand is clearly a PL quality, international footballer who is in huge demand and sits at the top of the goalscoring charts. The club can push as much as they want with him.
Erm. Did you read what I wrote?
Fuck half invested. We have a new owner and are debt free. Three quarters at least.
Love the optimism/bullishness but realistically if we initially reinvested half of 15-20m I’d be happy enough. We bring in say 4 players on 10k+ per week, that alone could add a couple of million quid pa wages onto expenditure (less Viks wages) which needs to be taken into consideration in future years
Id be gutted to see him go as he’s probably my favourite player in recent years but there’s no doubt on my mind if a Premiership club comes in for him, he’ll want to go. He’s an ambitious lad and an international and after seeing what’s happened to ohare you can’t blame a player for wanting to secure a move to Prem if opportunity arises
I suppose I’m thinking wage bill as well. But I’d wait until the summer when we’ve got £70k+/wk off the books by all accounts.
Only if 1 interested party. Appears there are severalClearly if the king deal falls apart vultures will be circling and not offering the type of money discussed here
According to Talksports Alex Crook Brighton will receive a significant sell-on clause from any transfer.
I agree that there will be a sell on clause to benefit Brighton, but I'm not sure that it'll be any more than 15%. My reasoning being that his loan deal at Swansea was poor and whilst he improved here....he wasn't looking like a player capable of stepping up to the PL, which goes to show what a brilliant job Vik and our coaching staff have done.
Not sure that selling Vik for £1m given his track record at that point was "cheap".....it might seem like that now, but some on here were questioning that fee.You could argue that's the exact reason there would be a hefty sell on %.
Brighton sell to us on the cheap, but on the off chance he becomes really good they put a big % clause in to cover themselves. We're not cash rich so happy to take him for a lower fee but with high sell on clause, not expecting him to be going for anywhere near 20m in the future!
Some on here were questioning a feeNot sure that selling Vik for £1m given his track record at that point was "cheap".....it might seem like that now, but some on here were questioning that fee.
Not sure that selling Vik for £1m given his track record at that point was "cheap".....it might seem like that now, but some on here were questioning that fee.
Not sure that selling Vik for £1m given his track record at that point was "cheap".....it might seem like that now, but some on here were questioning that fee.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?