Grendel
Well-Known Member
It will be in all player contracts negotiated at the point the contract was signed
Doubt they would qualify even for the promotion bonus, mc nally only played one game and twine maybe half a dozen.
Doubt they would qualify even for the promotion bonus, mc nally only played one game and twine maybe half a dozen.
Pretty standard stuff tbf. I have a mate who moved clubs as a pro and had every bonus written into his contract you could shake a stick at (regardless of if he played or not ) though I'm not sure how the loaned players scheme would work out. Surely McNally would fall into our bonus system.Oh ! I'm glad you know so much about other teams players contracts I'll consider myself corrected .
It's like getting a gift card at Christmas. Pointless. Just give cash so you can spend it on anythingMcNally + Twine plus ~£10 million is a poor deal for us. We just need the cash ffs, how hard is this for people to understand?
He's on about Portugal not the north of Ireland mate
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Brain fade on my part thereLisburn Northern Ireland?
TBF if we do end up doing some sort of exchange we can fiddle it a bit so Brighton get less of a cut.McNally + Twine plus ~£10 million is a poor deal for us. We just need the cash ffs, how hard is this for people to understand?
McNally + Twine plus ~£10 million is a poor deal for us. We just need the cash ffs, how hard is this for people to understand?
Don’t be ridiculous. Coventry won’t sell Vik for £10m plus 2 loansNot a chance either would be permanent too
You do realise it is possible to understand something but not agree with it?McNally + Twine plus ~£10 million is a poor deal for us. We just need the cash ffs, how hard is this for people to understand?
It’s just something someone suggested on here which has been picked up by the press as far as I can tell. I don’t think it’s a genuine rumour as such.McNally + Twine plus ~£10 million is a poor deal for us. We just need the cash ffs, how hard is this for people to understand?
Wouldn't be the worst deal . We need bodies ,and both are decent signings plus it puts some money in the coffersMcNally + Twine plus ~£10 million is a poor deal for us. We just need the cash ffs, how hard is this for people to understand?
Don’t be ridiculous. Coventry won’t sell Vik for £10m plus 2 loans
Literally no-one has suggested we should give up 2 or £3 million of our transfer budget on another AM this window, but as soon as Burnley show up with a fistful of Disney dollars and the chance to sign a player who people have half-heard of, we start losing our shit.Wouldn't be the worst deal . We need bodies ,and both are decent signings plus it puts some money in the coffers
Pretty standard stuff tbf. I have a mate who moved clubs as a pro and had every bonus written into his contract you could shake a stick at (regardless of if he played or not ) though I'm not sure how the loaned players scheme would work out. Surely McNally would fall into our bonus system.
Sporting are a great club though and would probably get to play European football.Really surprising. The bottom half of that league is like non-league here. The players might be a bit better but the stadiums and attendances are so poor.
Surely if a PL side were interested, he wouldn’t go.
It will be if Sporting don’t or won’t pay the asking price which is north of £20million.By the sounds of it vik is sold on sporting that could be the sticking point.
Interesting ideaHow about Burnely just using McNally &Twine loans as bait to sweeten a deal, reduce the fee by 1-2m and they pay the wages?
Mutually beneficial, neither player is likely going to breakout as a Prem starter anytime soon. Burnley get the man they want and retain a couple of young talented players. They can use them next year if they get relegated or cash in if notInteresting idea
Probably 35-40%.Like a lot of posters here think this needs to be done this week so it puts focus on a replacement ,we are not going to get a like for like replacement.
How much do we think robins will get to reinvest from Viks fee.
Me think he will get 50% of the fee.
Twine would be an amazing signing but unfortunately I have to agree with you about him not wanting to come here.Would love twine to be part of the deal but just can’t see him dropping to the championship, he’ll be wanting to prove himself in the premier league for sure.
McNally would definitely come I think if offered.
He’s barely even proved himself in the Championship.Would love twine to be part of the deal but just can’t see him dropping to the championship, he’ll be wanting to prove himself in the premier league for sure.
McNally would definitely come I think if offered.
Less so than McNally!He’s barely even proved himself in the Championship.
We were play off finalists, if we can show just a little bit of ambition by tying Hamer down to a deal and making some signings I think we are an attractive club to join outside of the relegated teams and a couple of other clubs in the division.And both will likely stay in the championship at better teams than us
McNally + Twine plus ~£10 million is a poor deal for us. We just need the cash ffs, how hard is this for people to understand?
...or the highest fee we've ever received, while in the EFL rather than the EPL, for a player with a year left on his contract.Fee of £15m would be a disaster.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?