Gyokeres (1 Viewer)

D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
Harry Kane who turns 30 next year and is also out of contact next season doesn't seem to be offered at a knock down price. I realise the negotiating positions are different however I think we should be resolved not to be seen as a soft touch.
Indeed. It's only relevant if Gyokeres is prepared to waste a year of his career and I would be very surprised if he was.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Harry Kane who turns 30 next year and is also out of contact next season doesn't seem to be offered at a knock down price. I realise the negotiating positions are different however I think we should be resolved not to be seen as a soft touch.
He could agree terms with them in 6 months time and leave on a free next summer.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
He could agree terms with them in 6 months time and leave on a free next summer.
Then he loses a year of playing at the top level and spends a year at a lower salary. Also if he gets injured like O'Hare he misses out on a move completely. Don't see what would be in it for Gyokeres.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Nobody has yet to answer me why a manager with money to spend who sees Gyokeres as the answer would wait a year and risk being sacked.

Sure, some clubs won't have money, but he's going to have plenty of suitors.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Then he loses a year of playing at the top level and spends a year at a lower salary. Also if he gets injured like O'Hare he misses out on a move completely. Don't see what would be in it for Gyokeres.

He’s contracted to us and it’s up to us to decide what we sell him for. From his POV, I’m sure he want to make the step up because he’s ready, but with all the teams that are mooted as being interested… we’ve got leverage.

In comparison, because the interest in Hamer is not so obvious, we don’t have the same leverage and the risk of getting a bad deal is riskier.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Nobody has yet to answer me why a manager with money to spend who sees Gyokeres as the answer would wait a year and risk being sacked.

Sure, some clubs won't have money, but he's going to have plenty of suitors.
And if he was available for free what club wouldn't be interested in him. It would be instant profit as well as a very good prospect.

Can't see anything happening for a couple more weeks at least unless a club sees him as their main target and want to beat everyone else to his signing.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
And if he was available for free what club wouldn't be interested in him. It would be instant profit as well as a very good prospect.

Can't see anything happening for a couple more weeks at least unless a club sees him as their main target and want to beat everyone else to his signing.
Which Sporting Lisbon are trying to do but they don’t have the financial clout. A Prem team will pay £15m for him comfortably.

The Championship is as good test for strikers hoping to make the step up. Toney, Mitrovic and Watkins have all made big impacts in recent seasons.

The only red flag about Gyokeres is the amount of chances he misses. Comfortably at the top of the Championship in this metric, but otherwise is a good buy at £20m.
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
Which Sporting Lisbon are trying to do but they don’t have the financial clout. A Prem team will pay £15m for him comfortably.

The Championship is as good test for strikers hoping to make the step up. Toney, Mitrovic and Watkins have all made big impacts in recent seasons.

The only red flag about Gyokeres is the amount of chances he misses. Comfortably at the top of the Championship in this metric, but otherwise is a good buy at £20m.

They don’t have the same clout as a Prem club but they’re about to sell their star player to PSG for €60m, so if they really want him they could push the boat out to get him for £20m.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
Nobody has yet to answer me why a manager with money to spend who sees Gyokeres as the answer would wait a year and risk being sacked.

Sure, some clubs won't have money, but he's going to have plenty of suitors.
Becuase these days most football clubs operate a director of football model, the players are brought in to fit a system as is a manager. It’s a continuity thing - basically the manager effectively works with what he’s given
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Becuase these days most football clubs operate a director of football model, the players are brought in to fit a system as is a manager. It’s a continuity thing - basically the manager effectively works with what he’s given
You think Dyche would wait? Moyes? The Australian geezer at Spurs? You think a Director of Football would do without a striker for a year?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Each position higher up the Prem table is worth about 2.2m. Gyokeres could easily be the difference of just 5 points over a season.

Everton were safe in 17th position. If they had 5 more points they would have finished in 13th. It would have been worth nearly an extra 9m. That could be about half the price of Gyokeres.

Or just an extra 2 points would have saved Leicester. That would have been much more.
 

Mcbean

Well-Known Member
The only red flag about Gyokeres is the amount of chances he misses. Comfortably at the top of the Championship in this metric, but otherwise is a good buy at £20m.
I would assume a Prem club would think they have a better midfield to supply Vik more readily with the ball ( however hopefully we can keep Gus)
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Brentford or West Ham seem like a good fit IMO.

Both desperately need a striker and both play in a way that would suit him.
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
You think Dyche would wait? Moyes? The Australian geezer at Spurs? You think a Director of Football would do without a striker for a year?
Modern football works like that, they’ll have a list of strikers with an attached value. If they can’t get one for the value they want to pay

Kevin Thelwell is in charge of recruitment at Everton and Scott Munn is in charge at spurs.

the oversee the transfers. The manager will get a list of available players and he may have a say on which ones. The lists will likely say, Gyokeres - summer 2024… we can get Player B now

the DoF oversees the long term strategy. Nowadays with the right strategy the manager is a seamlessly changed position. We’re looking to operate that way with Dean Austin
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
If he does go to the PL it’ll be interesting to see how he gets on. He’s got a bit more about him than the other strikers who are too good for the Championship but not quite good enough for the PL.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
I would assume a Prem club would think they have a better midfield to supply Vik more readily with the ball ( however hopefully we can keep Gus)
Potentially, Gyokeres missed the most clear cut chances this season and last by a significant margin. However, he also had the lowest xG of the top scorers in the league which suggests his chances were ‘harder’.

He’s still developing as a player so there’s no reason he cannot be a solid 10-15 goal a season striker in the Prem (at least).
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Which Sporting Lisbon are trying to do but they don’t have the financial clout. A Prem team will pay £15m for him comfortably.

The Championship is as good test for strikers hoping to make the step up. Toney, Mitrovic and Watkins have all made big impacts in recent seasons.

The only red flag about Gyokeres is the amount of chances he misses. Comfortably at the top of the Championship in this metric, but otherwise is a good buy at £20m.

Haaland missed more chances than anyone in the PL. this is hardly a list of crap strikers:


3D7EDBBC-0C34-4032-87CE-2D998C4E23FB.jpeg
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
And if he was available for free what club wouldn't be interested in him. It would be instant profit as well as a very good prospect.

Can't see anything happening for a couple more weeks at least unless a club sees him as their main target and want to beat everyone else to his signing.
But then you risk the chance of not getting him because he has more suitors. No instant profit to be had if he doesn't sign for you.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Becuase these days most football clubs operate a director of football model, the players are brought in to fit a system as is a manager. It’s a continuity thing - basically the manager effectively works with what he’s given
And it's a stupid system.

If a manager is responsible for results on the field, then you have to give them the decision of who they buy to put out on that field.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Yep the best strikers score lots and miss lots
Or the best teams create loads of chances making the strikers look better. If you're playing regulalry for the likes of Man City, Arsenal, Liverpool, Man u etc and you don't score 15-20 goals then you should be considered a bit of a failure.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Certainly not the point I was making. It’s more of a consideration for Gyokeres’ potential suitors i.e. if they struggle to create chances perhaps they need to find a more clinical striker.
But then they'd create more chances if they signed Gyokeres
 

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
And it's a stupid system.

If a manager is responsible for results on the field, then you have to give them the decision of who they buy to put out on that field.
Not necessarily - Mourinho for instance had an issue at United there wasn’t a director of football, to deal with the off the field stuff

the particular system also looks into the long term planning and development of the club. As I said Robins understands this and it is Dean Austin is in charge of this at CCFC. it allows an identity to be ingrained in a club.

id argue it is for a manager to fit In with the club culture rather than the other way round
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
But then they'd create more chances if they signed Gyokeres

This is spot on, didnt Vik create one of the highest number of chances in the league ? Also why he missed some sitters* as they usually involved him sprinting past players and not having time to set himself

*barely any of them were. I class a sitter as standing still, six yards out and just keeper to beat. Not sprinting at full pelt, 18 yards out with keeper closing down angle
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
This is spot on, didnt Vik create one of the highest number of chances in the league ? Also why he missed some sitters* as they usually involved him sprinting past players and not having time to set himself

*barely any of them were. I class a sitter as standing still, six yards out and just keeper to beat. Not sprinting at full pelt, 18 yards out with keeper closing down angle
He also made a fair few of his goals himself, too.

I really think we undervalue just how good he's been for us the past couple of seasons.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
He also made a fair few of his goals himself, too.

I really think we undervalue just how good he's been for us the past couple of seasons.
But then they'd create more chances if they signed Gyokeres


Haaland missed more chances than anyone in the PL. this is hardly a list of crap strikers:


View attachment 30139


I’m certainly not devaluing him. If he had another year on this contract, my asking price would be £35-40m comfortably. He’s the best striker I’ve had the pleasure of watching for Cov and I believe he’ll make a good Prem striker.

It’s undeniable that his conversion rate isn’t the best - 13.2% and he’s missed more big chances than he’s scored, 38 missed v 26 scored (since the 21/22 season). Which for context, @shmmeee the conversion rate would be one of, if not the lowest of the list you shared.

Gyokeres is still developing and he’ll improve his game so I’m certain he’ll make the grade at Premiership standard. It’s a shame it’ll be without us.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top