Matt smith
Well-Known Member
It’s whether we spend it.
if we get 35 for vik and Gus combined that’s great business but 15/17 million should be spent
Hamer (5 Viewers)
- Thread starter Covcraig@bury
- Start date
if we get 35 for vik and Gus combined that’s great business but 15/17 million should be spent
Martin180
Well-Known Member
Matt Smith's daily breakdown
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Didn’t expect anything less from you, wanker
Martin180
Well-Known Member
Cheer up mate , only joshing
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Do wonder if there’s a ceiling on how much damage we can do in one window though. Although maybe that’s been done already with the clear out and it’s just upping our targets.
Would hate to see Gus go, but if it opened up another £7.5m or so to spend across the squad I could be convinced. Only if he doesn’t want to stay though.
Something like:
GK (£2m)/Wilson/Tyler
McNally (£3m)/Latibeaudiere
Fadz/CB (£2m)
Kitching (£1m)/Humphries
Sakamoto/BNC (L)/Burroughs
DaSilva/Bidwell
CM (£2m)/CM (£1m)/Howley
Sheaf/Eccles/Kelly
AM (L)/O’Hare/Palmer/Allen
ST (£2m)/ST(L)/Simms/Godden
Thats £13m with the rest of the Vik money and Gus money. Make the right signings and that’s comfortably a better squad than last season. 28 including 3 kids, should be plenty deep enough for a sustained push.
Calista
Well-Known Member
You mean at Ryton?
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
Lads, if you read the teamtalk site they post stuff for click bait, we'll see what happens but don't stress over fucking teamtalk
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Oh I agree hold some back for January if we can get say:
McNally 2/3
RWB - Joel on a free
RWB 2 - loan
Another CB - permanent freebie
Another CB - permanent fee (1/2)
LCB loan say a Humphreys
ST - a gem from Europe/league one level - 2 million
ST - Prem loan
My arguement was if Gus goes, if we just say 15 another 5 should be invested on top of what I’ve said
SkyblueDad
Well-Known Member
What ever is happening re. Gus MR will know and will have known for a while. My take is if he was definitely off he wouldn’t be in Portugal with the team, why would he be ?
Doesn’t stop interest or bids but we are in the driving seat price wise and as we have seen with the Gorkeres transfer Doug King can play a tough game in negotiations.
Doesn’t stop interest or bids but we are in the driving seat price wise and as we have seen with the Gorkeres transfer Doug King can play a tough game in negotiations.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
If we did sell Gus for 16 million with that what is left of teh vik cash we could build a team that is much better than last year without actually having a player as good as gus
Flying Fokker
Well-Known Member
He’s still with us. Until something else happens, I’m happy with that.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
I’m hoping we’ll see about half the Vik fee spent, so the same again from Gus would be good.
SBAndy
Well-Known Member
You have my attention.
Certainly wouldn’t be averse to O’Brien plus cash. Can’t see it though.
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
50% of sales is reasonable to expect
Speedie's Head
Well-Known Member
I'd want to see every last penny of it reinvested in the team in one way or another
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
It won’t be
anything less than half and it’s a bit of a piss take
18.5 STH
PO money
Speedie's Head
Well-Known Member
Let's see but let's not make it easy for him by saying the fans only expect 50%
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Oh, that’s what I expect and would accept just about
We lose both Vic and Gus in this window, we're in a bit of bother. It leaves a huge hole, it shouldn't be underestimated just how good they are.
When I say bother, I'm not suggesting we'd be in any trouble next season, but I couldn't see us pushing on from last term. It would require a comprehensive rebuild, and some of the signings will flop, it is inevitable. We have the right people in charge of course, but you feel the rebuild might take a couple of years to bear fruit.
We have to do what it takes to keep him for another season imo. 20K per week would only be an annual uplift of 500K or so. Surely we pay that rather than pay £2-3 million + wages for a replacement unlikely to be anywhere near his level (if of course he'd be willing to stay for that sort of money).
When I say bother, I'm not suggesting we'd be in any trouble next season, but I couldn't see us pushing on from last term. It would require a comprehensive rebuild, and some of the signings will flop, it is inevitable. We have the right people in charge of course, but you feel the rebuild might take a couple of years to bear fruit.
We have to do what it takes to keep him for another season imo. 20K per week would only be an annual uplift of 500K or so. Surely we pay that rather than pay £2-3 million + wages for a replacement unlikely to be anywhere near his level (if of course he'd be willing to stay for that sort of money).
pusbccfc
Well-Known Member
Like with Vik and the fee we got for him, £16m is too much to turn down.
People won't like it, but longer term we are in a brilliant position with those pounds. A season in mid-table and time to spend the money properly over the next 2 years isn't a bad option as long as we secure our status at this level. Making £30m+ of profit on two previously unknown players is incredible.
People won't like it, but longer term we are in a brilliant position with those pounds. A season in mid-table and time to spend the money properly over the next 2 years isn't a bad option as long as we secure our status at this level. Making £30m+ of profit on two previously unknown players is incredible.
David O'Day
Well-Known Member
Exactly, the money we could spend on improving the whole team if spent wisely would be we could challenge for years
People are getting a bit giddy over the money and what we might do with it. There's no guarantee we spend it well.
Pay him what he wants, get him on a new deal and let's have a real go next season and build on the momentum. His value is highly unlikely to go down, we can always revisit this next season if circumstances dictate. Losing both of them now would require huge adjustment.
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Exactly, people underestimate how key he is to us and I disagree we’d be be a better team next year without him
it’s like yeah we’ll sell him and vik and we’ll be better
21 and 10 g and a
11 and 10 g and a
mid table consolidation unfortunately next year
Last edited:
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
TBH I’d go to £30k on a two year deal with a release clause at a set price if we aren’t promoted. It’s almost always cheaper to give your high performers a raise than hire in equal quality.
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
No chance we’ll give 30
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Well no, but I don’t run the club. You’d be paying £20k/week and £4-5M to have any chance of replacing him and even then it’s a massive gamble.
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
O'Brien's wages would make it a non starter
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
Yeah, so why don’t they just offer him the contract, it’s really aggrevating
we won’t be spending 20k a week on a replacement
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
Not about money I don’t think now
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
I’ve no idea I just think if he won’t sign a new contract we have to sell
Cufflinks ?
I agree. I just think it sounds like he’s got the opportunity to have a crack at the Prem and earn more than we can ever offer him. If that’s the case he’s gone