Rob S
Well-Known Member
A bit of hair-splitting I think. Sisu's QC setting up some things I think.
Now into relationship with Webber Shandwick.
They're referring to evidence that we can't see (until later) so more difficult to follow some parts.
He said he had no knowledge about sisu out stuff?
He said he had no knowledge about sisu out stuff? Genius
What's that got to do with anything though?
I wouldn't worry about this case too much fella, the important one is the JR. By the way, Higgs haven't won this case yet, it is only the Sisu counter claim which has been thrown out. This looked ludicrous when they made it and it has turned out to be so.
What will happen today? Is there more evidence to be heard or is it just the decision on the Higgs claim?
A bit of hair-splitting I think. Sisu's QC setting up some things I think.
Now into relationship with Webber Shandwick.
They're referring to evidence that we can't see (until later) so more difficult to follow some parts.
They're either trying to get PWKH to fall into a trap for something down the line or are desperately short of any actual evidence as nothing they're bringing up seems to have any relevance to the case.
If he's denying knowledge of 'SISU out stuff', I presume he's making reference to an orchestrated plan - as SISU claim in their JR; not the chanting and/or banners at games. As everyone knew the latter existed (especially those who were forcibly ejected by the orange-jacketed buffoons for having the temerity to unfurl a 'flammable' banner in a public place...)
They're either trying to get PWKH to fall into a trap for something down the line or are desperately short of any actual evidence as nothing they're bringing up seems to have any relevance to the case.
You would have to think that the balloons were only brought up in order to immediately paint a picture of a childish and irresponsible man to the judge.......
I think you are right Godiva ................. I think they want to "expose" documents to make them public so they can use in the JR, which in turn must mean there is no direct link from SISU to SBS&L group in terms of ownership perhaps? Because if ownership by SISU were established clearly wouldn't they be able to use those documents in anyway?
Because if ownership by SISU were established clearly wouldn't they be able to use those documents in anyway?
You would have to think that the balloons were only brought up in order to immediately paint a picture of a childish and irresponsible man to the judge.......
Either way, good to get as much of this out in the open as possible, imho.
Is it the case that you can't use documents obtained as a defendant in one case as a claimant in another?
But sisu doesn't own SBS&L - do they?
I wonder if he regrets it now then?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
I wonder if he regrets it now then?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
I wonder if he regrets it now then?
I wonder if he regrets it now then?
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
I think we have all done things we think are funny at the time and regret later Torch
Absolutely but ours probably aren't read out to a judge!
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
I wonder if he regrets it now then?
I think he apologised at the time. I'm sure you've never done anything daft you regret though, have you?
Besides, in the scale of crimes, moving the club to Northampton and running CCFC Ltd into oblivion seems somewhat larger to me. Where's the apology for that?
If you believe they are fishing for evidence they can use in the JR, then expect them to ask a lot of questions with references to mails, reports and other written materials that has so far been inaccessible for them.
Deep into communications behind the agreement (or lack of) now.
Gary Hoffman and Joe Elliot mentioned in comms at time of due diligence.
Sitting next to Simon Gilbert – steam coming off his pen!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?