Higgs vs CCFC Court Row (52 Viewers)

[lordsummerisle]

How can any self-respecting business go from:

SISU-officer Ran Ranson stating in the late summer of 2009: 'We're now one of only three clubs in the country that is debt free”

To 2012 - three years on - to SISU stating they need the Higgs share, lest they close the place?!?

Because Ranson is a lying bastard?

 

---

[Mary_Mungo_Midge]

Because Ranson was a fool?

Maybe so; but SISU's fool. They can't keep on going on like this. By completing Due Diligence and buying the club, they assume responsibility for the actions, responsibilities, incomes and liabilities of all previous regimes. Any distance they may now wish to place between the current guardians of the club, and their own appointed officer in Ranson is even harder to try and justify. He was their man

 

[ajsccfc]

We were debt-free, in the sense that your uncle pays off your credit card so you're not really in debt but you still need to pay him back. And he's the weird uncle who gets a bit handsy at family parties after a few.

 

[oldskyblue58]

There was a mechanism that that SISU apparently paid £1m for that gave them the ability to purchase the Charity share any time up to 2015 I believe - the option

Of course it couldn't be actioned as soon as the rent and any other bills were outside of the normal terms for settlement. So apparently they just threw away £1m then ?

 

[Sub]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert39sHiggs barrister is having to work hard to get some of the answers he is seeking from Ms Deering.

 

[Mary_Mungo_Midge]

Because Ranson is a lying bastard?

See above. If your assertion is true, and I'm not challenging you on it's integrity, then he's theirs.

In fairness, follow that lineage through to Fisher's claims about the stadium, and frankly Labovich's claims on just about anything; and there's a touch of the Aldridge Priors about it all

 

[Sub]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert5sMs Deering insists Sisu still wanted to complete deal for Higgs share in ACL after exclusivity period with Higgs had ended.

 

[lordsummerisle]

Maybe so; but SISU's fool. They can't keep on going on like this. By completing Due Diligence and buying the club, they assume responsibility for the actions, responsibilities, incomes and liabilities of all previous regimes. Any distance they may now wish to place between the current guardians of the club, and their own appointed officer in Ranson is even harder to try and justify. He was their man

The distance that some try to place between Ranson and Sisu is the more laughable.

 

[Sub]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert13sHiggs seem to have insisted on proof of funds to continue share negotiations. Deering says Sisu wanted more time for due diligence.

 

[oldskyblue58]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert5sMs Deering insists Sisu still wanted to complete deal for Higgs share in ACL after exclusivity period with Higgs had ended.

So if she accepts that the exclusivity ended then Charity in rights to offer elsewhere

 

[Sub]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert34sDeering also says Sisu were not allowed to meet Higgs' advisors to address charity's concerns.

 

[oldskyblue58]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert13sHiggs seem to have insisted on proof of funds to continue share negotiations. Deering says Sisu wanted more time for due diligence.

Haven't had a good record with due diligence it seems, I could be wrong of course

 

[lordsummerisle]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert13sHiggs seem to have insisted on proof of funds to continue share negotiations. Deering says Sisu wanted more time for due diligence.

To be fair, don't think anybody could criticise that.

 

[dongonzalos]

So for the JR so far...

The council will argue they had to step in as they thought the club was going to be liquidated.

SISU agreed a HOT. Then went past the exclusivity period and it is now agreed cannot prove that they carried on with any negotiations after this.

SISU agree that they would have pulled the funding if they did not get the deal.

Higgs were verbally told the council would let SISU know the council were going to bid for the loan. There was no legal obligation to do this and SISU say the council did not.

 

[oldskyblue58]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert34sDeering also says Sisu were not allowed to meet Higgs' advisors to address charity's concerns.

largely irrelevant if the Charity Trustees felt capable of dealing with the matters raised I would have thought up to Charity whether they seek their advisors to be involved or not

 

[James Smith]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert13sHiggs seem to have insisted on proof of funds to continue share negotiations. Deering says Sisu wanted more time for due diligence.

Maybe the Higgs had heard of Jo Dhinsa and wanted to make sure there was some cash this time?

 

[oldskyblue58]

To be fair, don't think anybody could criticise that.

In one sense no LS but the purpose of the exclusivity period is to get the due diligence done. They had a time limit that had to be met or an agreed extension. Seems neither happened

 

[Hobo]

See above. If your assertion is true, and I'm not challenging you on it's integrity, then he's theirs.

In fairness, follow that lineage through to Fisher's claims about the stadium, and frankly Labovich's claims on just about anything; and there's a touch of the Aldridge Priors about it all

SISU and Ranson deserved each other, Aldridge Priors indeed.

There are a few Bertie Bunts Parrots on this forum as well.
;-)

 

[dongonzalos]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert5sMs Deering insists Sisu still wanted to complete deal for Higgs share in ACL after exclusivity period with Higgs had ended.

Am I imagining this but did Mr Fisher not say words to the effect off after looking ACL books they were clearly not a viable business and only worth a couple of million at the most and they decided it wasn't worth buying. Am I imagining that?

 

[oldskyblue58]

Am I imagining this but did Mr Fisher not say words to the effect off after looking ACL books they were clearly not a viable business and only worth a couple of million at the most and they decided it wasn't worth buying. Am I imagining that?

i think something like that was said don

 

[lordsummerisle]

In one sense no LS but the purpose of the exclusivity period is to get the due diligence done. They had a time limit that had to be met or an agreed extension. Seems neither happened

An agreed extension would have been the way to do it I agree.

Expect they didn't want to get burned again after falling for Joe's "Ticking clock" when taking over the club, wouldn't blame them for that.

Also don't blame Higgs for seeking proof of funds before going too far down the road to a sale either.

 

[Hobo]

Am I imagining this but did Mr Fisher not say words to the effect off after looking ACL books they were clearly not a viable business and only worth a couple of million at the most and they decided it wasn't worth buying. Am I imagining that?

No you are not. It is SISU doing all the imaginative thinking.

 

[Sub]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert20sA separate deal for Higgs share was discussed between Joy Seppala, Sisu, and Paul Harris, Higgs. Away from negotiations for bank debt.

 

[Moff]

I don't think 'Readers Wives' was ever a 'special interest journal' in it's own right, was it? I remember it as a section in one of the magazines of the day - perhaps Mayfair or Knave (!?!); which would give opportunity for some casting fettler from Scunthorpe to showcase his partner's dubious acreage of milky-white, portly skin?

I believe it did get its own journal rights for a time. Well at least a friend told me it did!

Sounds like you have spent some time in Scunthorpe in days past by your detailed description. It wasnt one of those parties where you threw your Rover 'Van den Plas' keys into a bowl was it?

(Sorry for digressing from the court case and pages of arguing everyone)

 

[The Prefect]

To be fair, don't think anybody could criticise that.

I have worked on a few takeovers in my time and due diligence doesn't take forever and needs to have an agreed finish. You can't open your books to a third party forever. If SISU needed more due diligence they should have put more resources in.

I'm sceptical. Six weeks should have been long enough to look at ACL's books as they're not a particularly complicated business. Asking for more time could be seen as a stalling tactic.

 

[Sub]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert9sMiss Deering says offer for charity's share was considerably less than agreed in original discussions due to 'increased risk' to Sisu.

 

[oldskyblue58]

question - if they only continued funding the club because they wanted the Charity share why are they still "funding it"?

Isn't Ms Deering an employee? In which case what authority for decision making does she have? What authority does she have for issuing funding or negotiating? - no t having a go would just like to know because I understood JS made all the major decisions

 

[Sub]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert31sMr Harris previously claimed original deal was £5.5m for charity's share. New deal around £2million.

 

[lordsummerisle]

I believe it did get its own journal rights for a time. Well at least a friend told me it did!

Sounds like you have spent some time in Scunthorpe in days past by your detailed description. It wasnt one of those parties where you threw your Rover 'Van den Plas' keys into a bowl was it?

(Sorry for digressing from the court case and pages of arguing everyone)

Used to call Readers Wives "Naafi Monthly" when I was in the RAF.

They nearly all seemed to have MOD issue curtains(not beef!) and furniture in the background.

 

[oldskyblue58]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert20sA separate deal for Higgs share was discussed between Joy Seppala, Sisu, and Paul Harris, Higgs. Away from negotiations for bank debt.

so the deal referred to with Yorkshire bank is not connected to the share purchase then ? In which case how does the CCC loan affect the Charity share deal proposed in May/June?

 

[Sub]

1. Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert4 mins
2. A separate deal for Higgs share was discussed between Joy Seppala, Sisu, and Paul Harris, Higgs. Away from negotiations for bank debt.

1. Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert14 mins
2. Deering also says Sisu were not allowed to meet Higgs' advisors to address charity's concerns.
   
   is there a contradiction here already ?

 

[Kingokings204]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert31sMr Harris previously claimed original deal was £5.5m for charity's share. New deal around £2million.

Finally the truth people..... Sisu backed down from the agree 5.5m which is a steal anyway and offered 2m hence it fell apart.

Case solved. They are wankers. Deserve everything they get now.

 

[duffer]

To be fair, don't think anybody could criticise that.

I think you can criticise it if at the same time as asking for an extension to complete due diligence they weren't paying the rent.

This, of course, directly impacted the organisation they wanted to negotiate with. Given that SISU hadn't exactly shown themselves as trustworthy by this point, who can blame the charity for declining to offer more time (if indeed that is what happened).

 

[Nick]

1. Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert4 mins
2. A separate deal for Higgs share was discussed between Joy Seppala, Sisu, and Paul Harris, Higgs. Away from negotiations for bank debt.

1. Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert14 mins
2. Deering also says Sisu were not allowed to meet Higgs' advisors to address charity's concerns.
   
   is there a contradiction here already ?

Is Harris an advisor for the Higgs?

 

[oldskyblue58]

Simon Gilbert‏@TheSimonGilbert31sMr Harris previously claimed original deal was £5.5m for charity's share. New deal around £2million.

There was no deal though only HOT's ....... hadn't done the due diligence so there couldn't be a final price could there?