Higgs vs CCFC Court Row (1 Viewer)

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Nobody has ever contacted me about PWKH or MMM though? Surely before making allegations they should at least confirm.

Sisu dont do due diligence Nick. i thought that was a well established fact ;)
 

Monners

Well-Known Member
Nobody has ever contacted me about PWKH or MMM though? Surely before making allegations they should at least confirm.

Did a thread a while back include a post in regard to MMM being contacted direclty? Not sure how though (and of course, I may have dreamt that!)
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
Nobody has ever contacted me about PWKH or MMM though? Surely before making allegations they should at least confirm.

Probably didn't want to disturb you, when it's obvious that I'm PWKH ;)
 

Nick

Administrator
I think he said he did, I don't know how it was though. Unless it was sent via PM on here but I haven't & wouldn't have given personal details (email) out unless it was the police etc.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Nobody has ever contacted me about PWKH or MMM though? Surely before making allegations they should at least confirm.

I understand SISU's legal guys thought PWKH and I were as one. I was also told via another contact I have close to events that they had a 'specific interest' in my posts. I haven't heard from them directly, but am judicious in terms of what a write now. People are watching!

The thing I find so amazing on this issue being that on many issues I have a vehement opinion with regards events at the club. The fact SISU and their advisors think that someone with inside knowledge such as PWKH would hold such a view speaks volumes about the relationship that exists...
 

Monners

Well-Known Member
I think he said he did, I don't know how it was though. Unless it was sent via PM on here but I haven't & wouldn't have given personal details (email) out unless it was the police etc.

Could have been the pm route I suppose (never intended to question your credibility Nick. Sorry if any offence caused - unintentional, I can assure you)

Just seen your post MMM
 

Nick

Administrator
Could have been the pm route I suppose (never intended to question your credibility Nick. Sorry if any offence caused - unintentional, I can assure you)

No it is fine :) It is just to clear it up, no offence taken with it anyway!

If SISU were to PM on here, they would need a username to do so!
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
By the way, I think some lack of understanding exists on the basis of this action. My understanding is that Higgs had an agreement that their costs would be met by SISU as a function of the failed negotiations. They invoiced against this arrangement, did not get paid and are therefore persuing recovery via the courts. Quite normal.

However, that is very different to the other party now counter claiming. That's an entirely new game. Anyone thinking it's simply quid pro quo should think again
 
Last edited:

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
By the way, I think some lack of understanding exists on the basis of this action. My understanding is that Higgs had an agreement that their costs would be met by SISU as a function of the failed negotiations. They invoiced against this arrangement, did not get paid and are therefore persuing recovery via the courts. Quite normal.

However, that is very different to the other party now counter claiming. That's an entirely new game. Anyone thinking it's simply quid pro quo should think again

I wouldn't call it a new game I'd call it a tactic in the bigger game.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
I wouldn't call it a new game I'd call it a tactic in the bigger game.

I would wholeheartedly agree. I don't see SISU's stance as living in isolation on this issue. But the belief that they are, or that their approach to this sits on par with the Higgs charity - who are seeking remittance against what I believe to be agreed costs - isn't at all an accurate one
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
I understand SISU's legal guys thought PWKH and I were as one. I was also told via another contact I have close to events that they had a 'specific interest' in my posts. I haven't heard from them directly, but am judicious in terms of what a write now. People are watching!

The thing I find so amazing on this issue being that on many issues I have a vehement opinion with regards events at the club. The fact SISU and their advisors think that someone with inside knowledge such as PWKH would hold such a view speaks volumes about the relationship that exists...

So nobody has actually contacted you to say that you were PWKH or threatened any action against you then?

Just what "some people" have said?
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
So nobody has actually contacted you to say that you were PWKH or threatened any action against you then?

Just what "some people" have said?

I think they contacted PWKH, how & why would someone attempt to contact MMM if they thought that poster was a nom de plume for PKWH?
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
I think they contacted PWKH, how & why would someone attempt to contact MMM if they thought that poster was a nom de plume for PKWH?

I'd have thought so myself, just typical over-egging of the pudding from MMM previously then.

Originally Posted by Mary_Mungo_Midge


And that's an accusation that's been made in private to me by SISU's legal advisors.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
I'd have thought so myself, just typical over-egging of the pudding from MMM previously then.

Dunno what you are on about, there are no eggs here..

I suppose the accusation could have been that he was being fed lines by PKWH, but I can't say either way.

Now, to change the subject, I wonder what conversations ML/TF have had with Jonathan Strange recently?
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
Dunno what you are on about, there are no eggs here..

I suppose the accusation could have been that he was being fed lines by PKWH, but I can't say either way.

Now, to change the subject, I wonder what conversations ML/TF have had with Jonathan Strange recently?

Well he was either contacted by Sisu's legal advisors or he wasn't?

He has said previously that he was, now he is saying that he wasn't?

Has he been got at by Sisu's legal advisors to say that he hasn't been got at by Sisu's legal advisors?

You love a conspiracy Jack, thought you could have come up with that one yourself?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Dunno what you are on about, there are no eggs here..

I suppose the accusation could have been that he was being fed lines by PKWH, but I can't say either way.

Now, to change the subject, I wonder what conversations ML/TF have had with Jonathan Strange recently?

whats the betting they couldn't understand his reply because he had his mouth full at the time.........












...... i meant that the conversation was over tea and biscuits off course.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
So nobody has actually contacted you to say that you were PWKH or threatened any action against you then?

Didn't PWKH mention on here that he had been accused of being MMM by SISU representatives? There's so much mud slinging going on I lose track of who said what!
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
So nobody has actually contacted you to say that you were PWKH or threatened any action against you then?

Just what "some people" have said?

I was told directly by the individual himself. I have never made any claims whatsoever, just given a totally honest recollection of events. No embellishments whatsoever.

As for the latter, I'd rather keep those to myself if you don't mind, as I'd rather not compromise the individual concerned.

If you have any evidence I've hammed things up, then by all means post the link here. However, I think you'll find I've always been totally candid. Not that I expect that to be reflected in any reduction in your caustic,ironic, self-serving fare at all though
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
I was told directly by the individual himself. I have never made any claims whatsoever, just given a totally honest recollection of events. No embellishments whatsoever.

As for the latter, I'd rather keep those to myself if you don't mind, as I'd rather not compromise the individual concerned.

If you have any evidence I've hammed things up, then by all means post the link here. However, I think you'll find I've always been totally candid. Not that I expect that to be reflected in any reduction in your caustic,ironic, self-serving fare at all though

So have you or haven't you been contacted directly by Sisu's legal advisors then?

Simple question which, and i know it may be difficult for you, can be answered in one word.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
So have you or haven't you been contacted directly by Sisu's legal advisors then?

Simple question which, and i know it may be difficult for you, can be answered in one word.

The answer is no, and I've explained that before, and again - for the avoidance of any misunderstanding - above. What's so hard to take in?
 

Nick

Administrator
So PWKH said that SISU Lawyer's thought he was MMM and told MMM this?

Case closed!

Kojaktelly.jpg
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
Fucking hell! pedantic springs to mind when splitting hairs like this.

Thank you. On one hand I'm accused of being too wordy, and then criticised by the same poster for not giving enough detail.

Trying awful hard to prove a point that doesn't seemingly need proving. I can only assume over exerting himself to cleanse himself of his own inferiority complex
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
Thank you. On one hand I'm accused of being too wordy, and then criticised by the same poster for not giving enough detail.

Trying awful hard to prove a point that doesn't seemingly need proving. I can only assume over exerting himself to cleanse himself of his own inferiority complex

You do always struggle when caught out MMM.
 

Mary_Mungo_Midge

Well-Known Member
You do always struggle when caught out MMM.

Not caught out. You always embarrass yourself by trying too hard to get one over on certain posters. Especially when there's no issue at stake. If you look at the psychology of the trait, it's an unfortunate thing you're unwittingly letting on
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
Not caught out. You always embarrass yourself by trying too hard to get one over on certain posters. Especially when there's no issue at stake. If you look at the psychology of the trait, it's an unfortunate thing you're unwittingly letting on

For the sake of clarity, why did you say that you were contacted in private by Sisu's legal representatives when you weren't?

Nothing to do with self-aggrandisment at all was it?

Your desperate search for validation on here by playing to the crowd says rather more about yourself than anything I have ever posted.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top