lordsummerisle
Well-Known Member
They very obviously didn't, and it has already been established that you're a bit dim, you don't need to keep reinforcing it.
I wont call them cunts and another thing you dont know anything about me. By the way if you think Sisu didnt do due diligence then you are more stupid than I thought you were
I wont call them cunts and another thing you dont know anything about me. By the way if you think Sisu didnt do due diligence then you are more stupid than I thought you were
They very obviously didn't, and it has already been established that you're a bit dim, you don't need to keep reinforcing it.
The majority of the debt is management fees that have not been taken by sisu and interest accrued on that that debt .............And yes from the horses mouth Tim Fisher to me face to face
give it up grendel you won't be happy even if a perfect city fan who is a billionaire and had business sense became the new owner
No doubt if the billionaire said they wanted the club but wanted the ground and ACL at a knockdown price you'd be up in arms screaming unfair and we must save ACL. All your interested in isn't it?
i note you choose to ignore facts but concentrate on the fantasy......your world
... And you've deliberately ignored the question because we all know what your answer will be.
You've got yourself in a pickle, I await your reply.
And the answer is NO
That sir, makes you a hypocrite, end of discussion now.
Hey, at least you answered honestly.
love to find the hypocrosy in the answer perhaps you can enlighten me
Essentially, you agree with the crux of SISU's argument, but you only oppose the argument because of SISU, wouldn't it void your argument?
Essentially, you agree with the crux of SISU's argument, but you only oppose the argument because of SISU, wouldn't it void your argument?
What is the crux of their argument? Violate contracts, self impose administration to spite debtors, and blame the company which has offered major concessions on all fronts?
Lower rent, backdated rent arrears, 100% F&B revs and need for share in ACL.
Hypothetical situation: PH4 said no takeover unless he doesn't get the above, I would guarantee that almost 90% of the 'ACL camp' (hate this branding business btw) would hop on the PH4 bandwagon, I'd be on PH4's side, but nothing would've changed from when SISU said the same things.
Lower rent, backdated rent arrears, 100% F&B revs and need for share in ACL.
Hypothetical situation: PH4 said no takeover unless he doesn't get the above, I would guarantee that almost 90% of the 'ACL camp' (hate this branding business btw) would hop on the PH4 bandwagon, I'd be on PH4's side, but nothing would've changed from when SISU said the same things.
People are just blinded by hate of SISU. They can't see that there is far bigger issues that if resolved could benefit CCFC regardless of who is in charge.
People are just blinded by hate of SISU. They can't see that there is far bigger issues that if resolved could benefit CCFC regardless of who is in charge.
I don't think you give credit to those people if you think it is just blind hate.
In fairness - I think SISU do themselves no favours with te fans. They appear secretive, which will usually meet with suspicion. On the other hand they are so secretive it is possible that they have tried nicey-fluffy approaches up until this season where the reality of L1 & future revenue-based spending dawned on someone that it was no longer a sustainable scenario. Then they perhaps have sought to push with whatever they can & any way they can.
Either way - I still doubt we've seen the last of them for a while yet unless favour behind the scenes at ACL is being played out with another potential owner.
The difference is Mr Haskell is talking about removing that problem by buying half of ACL.
I believe SISU were in a position to do the same. Even agreed a heads of terms then the familiar pattern emerged.....
Reading through the toolish abuse that passes for comment in some parts around here, I'd say blind hate sums up some of the posters around here.
Really? When has he said he will buy ACL?
Really? When has he said he will buy ACL?
Surly buying the Higgs half means that he would have a stake in ACL as they run the whole Arena on the CCC and Higgs behalf.
I think you will find he has offered to purchase 50% of ACL and wants 100% management.
Will the shareholders agree to a 50% sale?
Really? When has he said he will buy ACL?
Does it? I thought they were a separate company.
Ultimately full ownership surely is needed to maximise revenue.
It's better than creating an atmosphere of hostility and getting none and destroying any chance if ever getting any.
If we don't own the lot we will never be able to prosper as a club.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?