Hamer and Wilson did well.
Think we played for the draw, random changes at the end.
What world are you living in where Sheaf isn't also hated by our fans?Would love to see the comments if Shippers had played like Sheaf did tonight
Most of the time they're wrong but tonight he was poor. However there's a world of difference in saying someone's been poor and the hatred Ships gets from some. Not just on here but twatter and fuckbook tooWhat world are you living in where Sheaf isn't also hated by our fans?
Wilson 7
Dabo 5
Ostigard 6
McFadzean 6
Hyam 7
McCallum 6
Sheaf 5
Allen 5
Hamer 8
O'Hare 5
Walker 5
Biamou 5
Giles N/A
DaCosta N/A
Robins 5
Wilson 7.5 excellent saves, didn’t bring the guy down and good kicking long and short
Dabo - 6 lost half a point for not taking the fall and gaining the pen
McCallum - 6 excellent first half, tired second half
Mcfadzean - 6.5 solid
Hyam - 7 don’t get the judgment
Osti - 6.5 quiet and didn’t get on the end of lots of balls into the box
Hamer - 8 rushed things but he was so so good. Thing that I loved the most was he almost won the ball on the edge of their box and a minute later he covered a mistake by fadz on the edge of our box!!!
Sheaf - 6 nowhere near a 4. Much better second half
Allen - 6.5 thought he was good first half and linked things up and didn’t stop running
Ohare - 6.5 always wants the ball some lovely link up play with hamer
Walker - 6 so isolated but he really isn’t as lazy as some of our fans make out
Max - 6 could easily have got the winner and good set up play for hamer yellow card.
giles / dacosta - not on long enough
14 points in 8 games
Robins always finds a way.
Walker 5 (didn't get much to feed on but just looked fatigued)
Biamou 7 (looked sharper than Walker and caused a few problems. If only he got more of a contact after Dabo cross)
Was that the second half where he didn't tackle or the second half where he allowed them to shoot by not closing down in the box that Wilson had to save?Sheaf - 6 nowhere near a 4. Much better second half
Well he lost the ball in a tackle that was a foul. No it was when he was linking play and getting his foot in to halt attacksWas that the second half where he didn't tackle or the second half where he allowed them to shoot by not closing down in the box that Wilson had to save?
Wilson 8 (two good saves and a clean sheet)
Dabo 8 (came into it more second half offensively. Great work for Biamou chance)
McCallum 8 (looked great going forward first half and I thought best player on the pitch at that time. Quieter second half)
Ostigard 8 (pretty solid. Brought the ball out well on occasions)
McFadzean 8 (composed performance)
Hyam 8 (some sloppy moments first half but a couple of vital interventions in the second)
Sheaf 6 (did a lot of defensive work but continues to get caught dallying on the ball, leading to chances)
Hamer 9 (motm. The most decisive and incisive player. Great movement off the ball too)
Allen 7 (tracked back consistently and effectively all game. Was involved in some of the better build up play)
O'Hare 8 (unbelievable effort again. His fitness and desire is incredible)
Walker 5 (didn't get much to feed on but just looked fatigued)
Biamou 7 (looked sharper than Walker and caused a few problems. If only he got more of a contact after Dabo cross)
Giles (nice trickery before squaring for Hamer. Probably wrong option)
Dacosta (looks to have good touch and quick feet. Winced a bit after late foul given against him. Held his ankle. Hopefully not aggravating injury)
Probably a good point but again I hoped Robins would have made some earlier subs as so many of the group looked tired. Giles running at them earlier may have caused them issues)
When?Well he lost the ball in a tackle that was a foul.
Rewatch my friend he was ok second half. Not great but okWhen?
Wilson 8 (two good saves and a clean sheet)
Dabo 8 (came into it more second half offensively. Great work for Biamou chance)
McCallum 8 (looked great going forward first half and I thought best player on the pitch at that time. Quieter second half)
Ostigard 8 (pretty solid. Brought the ball out well on occasions)
McFadzean 8 (composed performance)
Hyam 8 (some sloppy moments first half but a couple of vital interventions in the second)
Sheaf 6 (did a lot of defensive work but continues to get caught dallying on the ball, leading to chances)
Hamer 9 (motm. The most decisive and incisive player. Great movement off the ball too)
Allen 7 (tracked back consistently and effectively all game. Was involved in some of the better build up play)
O'Hare 8 (unbelievable effort again. His fitness and desire is incredible)
Walker 5 (didn't get much to feed on but just looked fatigued)
Biamou 7 (looked sharper than Walker and caused a few problems. If only he got more of a contact after Dabo cross)
Giles (nice trickery before squaring for Hamer. Probably wrong option)
Dacosta (looks to have good touch and quick feet. Winced a bit after late foul given against him. Held his ankle. Hopefully not aggravating injury)
Probably a good point but again I hoped Robins would have made some earlier subs as so many of the group looked tired. Giles running at them earlier may have caused them issues)
Good thing we didn't win tonight eh else your car might have had another imaginary accident.
Wilson 7
Ostigard 6
McFadz 6
Hyam 6
Dabo 5
Mccallum 6
Sheaf 6
Hamer 7
O'Hare 6
Allen 6
Walker 5
Subs
Biamou 5
Giles n/a
Da Costa n/a
Good thing we didn't win tonight eh else your car might have had another imaginary accident.
Finding the Hamer ratings a bit over the top, he was decent but he didn't really get hold of the game, he's too frantic to his own cost at times. Should have done better with our only chance first half. Set piece delivery not as good as usual.
He really ishe’s like Boatang on acid
Jeez! Shipley this Shipley that! We get it-he goes to our meetings at the Nelson.Would love to see the comments if Shippers had played like Sheaf did tonight
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?