Investment rumour. (3 Viewers)

Otis

Well-Known Member
I have got to admit I was totally against us building a new ground and even said id never set foot in it, bit since the council/Wasps debacle and the recent revelation that they had been talking to each other for the last two years, I am very pro us building a stadium.
Yes we all know SISU royally f**ked up getting it before they came along so they take a huge part of the blame for where we are but its the only future we have in my eyes, and it being in or near Baginton is totally fine with me


Baginton is fine with me too, but I do want us to maximise the potential of getting as many fans watching the club as possible. The nearer any stadium is to the populate, the more it will feel part of the Coventry community and the more chance of getting bums on seats.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
Baginton is fine with me too, but I do want us to maximise the potential of getting as many fans watching the club as possible. The nearer any stadium is to the populate, the more it will feel part of the Coventry community and the more chance of getting bums on seats.

Agreed.

I'd also like the see where this 365 day revenue will come from.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
ccbc4a9d667525720eee2e5c0cd9f193.jpg


The old Courtaulds site at the end of Lockhurst lane is perfect.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
Other way round I think.

You think wrong. Rugby Council discussion revealed that.
CCC have no choice but to deal with any applications. If they reject it goes to appeal and is out their hands.

House building land delays could be reviewed to stop builders banking land.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You think wrong. Rugby Council discussion revealed that.
CCC have no choice but to deal with any applications. If they reject it goes to appeal and is out their hands.

House building land delays could be reviewed to stop builders banking land.

So Maton is a liar then?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Hoorah! Its the Grendel and Italia Show again.

I never, ever get bored with this .... ever .....


ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
CCC have no choice but to deal with any applications. If they reject it goes to appeal and is out their hands.

If you believe Fisher then the potential investors aren't prepared to have anything to do with CCC so how would it get to the point that an application was made?
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
Hoorah! Its the Grendel and Italia Show again.

I never, ever get bored with this .... ever .....
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

It's not me bringing it down pal.
My posts are on topic. Check back.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
So Maton is a liar then?
What is it with you always trying to get posters to call someone a liar?
If you don't agree fine put your argument across if you don't have the answer then shut the fuck up........
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
In summation.

Sisu- Bad, CCC - Bad, ACL - Bad. Fisher - Bad, Seppala - Bad, Wasps - Bad.

We need to be breaking bad.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
He would never post again if he took this advice......

I always put my argument across. It is for the record that councillor Maton said that there is no site available in the Coventry council boundary - his statement.

This whole thread is ridiculous for many reasons. One is the assertion you need to be closer to a city centre to attract greater crowds. Really think about that and it's pretty absurd.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
I always put my argument across. It is for the record that councillor Maton said that there is no site available in the Coventry council boundary - his statement.

This whole thread is ridiculous for many reasons. One is the assertion you need to be closer to a city centre to attract greater crowds. Really think about that and it's pretty absurd.

Can you provide your workings, that a stadium outside of Coventry will be viable.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Can you provide your workings, that a stadium outside of Coventry will be viable.

Well I can prove a stadium one hundred yards from the city boundary can increase the attendances by 80% in one year from a stadium ten minutes walk up from its centre.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
Well I can prove a stadium one hundred yards from the city boundary can increase the attendances by 80% in one year from a stadium ten minutes walk up from its centre.

That wasn't the question.

I asked you the other day to provide your workings on a CCFC stadium outside Coventry being viable. You did not. I've now asked you again.

Please provide accurate data to my question.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
That wasn't the question.

I asked you the other day to provide your workings on a CCFC stadium outside Coventry being viable. You did not. I've now asked you again.

Please provide accurate data to my question.

No one knows what the business model is. With respect the Ricoh project does answer the question.

Tell me, how much did the Ricoh project cost?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
So, how can you say you believe it to be viable?

I never said I know it is. I said it could be if the strategy is to get developers to pay for the vast majority of the build.

The Ricoh development - including the retail park cost the council less than 10% of the actual build. The MK Dons project cost the owner of the club nothing.

So if a £30 million stadium was constructed on the basis other retail investors fund the bulk of it of course it's then viable.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
To answer your question about the Ricoh's cost Grendel:

Yet previous council taxpayer investment was nothing like the full £118m final cost of building the Ricoh, which opened in 2005.
Costs were partly met from around £40m profit on a £59m sale of part of the land to Tesco; £21m borrowed money later repaid by ACL’s Yorkshire Bank loan; from Europe, the club, and from the former regional development agency, Advantage West Midlands.


From the CET.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
I never said I know it is. I said it could be if the strategy is to get developers to pay for the vast majority of the build.

The Ricoh development - including the retail park cost the council less than 10% of the actual build. The MK Dons project cost the owner of the club nothing.

So if a £30 million stadium was constructed on the basis other retail investors fund the bulk of it of course it's then viable.

And have SISU provided details about said investment?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
And have SISU provided details about said investment?

Where have I said they have? You asked if it was possible and I said yes - which it is.

Face it if the Ricoh had been built there in the first place no one would moan anyway.

I am not saying they will build anything but the argument from some that they can't walk there when they can at the Ricoh is pathetic. Build it in Berkswell and I can walk there
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
I never said I know it is. I said it could be if the strategy is to get developers to pay for the vast majority of the build.

The Ricoh development - including the retail park cost the council less than 10% of the actual build. The MK Dons project cost the owner of the club nothing.

So if a £30 million stadium was constructed on the basis other retail investors fund the bulk of it of course it's then viable.

Those days have gone unfortunately. I would say Coventry is retailed out.
The old gasworks site seemed to be a stroke of luck for CCFC and I still don't understand how we messed up.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
Where have I said they have? You asked if it was possible and I said yes - which it is.

Face it if the Ricoh had been built there in the first place no one would moan anyway.

I am not saying they will build anything but the argument from some that they can't walk there when they can at the Ricoh is pathetic. Build it in Berkswell and I can walk there

I've asked you about viability. Anything's possible.

It's also not just the cost of building, it's the revenue it would generate.

Do you believe it would generate 365 days revenue that would support CCFC pushing for the top end of championship/ premier league?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Those days have gone unfortunately. I would say Coventry is retailed out.
The old gasworks site seemed to be a stroke of luck for CCFC and I still don't understand how we messed up.

That's not the last retail park to built in Coventry is it?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I've asked you about viability.

It's also not just the cost of building, it's the revenue it would generate.

Do you believe it would generate 365 days revenue that would support CCFC pushing for the top end of championship/ premier league?

I believe the club will only have any chance of achieving if it owns access to those revenues - they offer no gaurentee - but they are the only hope.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top