Jodi Jones permanent deal..... (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter KersleyDigs
- Start date
steve82
Well-Known Member
In regards to the jodi Jones deal or transfer rules outside the Windows in general?
steve82
Well-Known Member
Not this season no, 25 man squad was named and cannot be changed till end of the season.
Nick
Administrator
Different to the Jones deal then, I assume we wanted him to be able to play anyway so is completely different
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
Definately Jodi Jones. I trust him implicitly on that. Trust me. With regards to transfer rules outside the Windows in general? I think NW has blown that one wide open
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
He can't. You can sign a player on a permanent deal whenever you feel like it, however.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Different to the Jones deal then, I assume we wanted him to be able to play anyway so is completely different
Not really. The deal was always a loan, with it being made a permanent contract in the summer.
Now where are you prevented from putting the latter half of that in writing?
Nick
Administrator
Do we know it isn't?
steve82
Well-Known Member
Different to the Jones deal then, I assume we wanted him to be able to play anyway so is completely different
Different transfer/loan rules for different leagues, eg premiership, football league, national league and below.
I believe we did a loan deal that has the most commonly used view to a permanent deal loop hole.
I'm sure if the deal was far from done we'd not be putting him in the shop window in a higher league than he was playing in. We'd have him under wraps.
Nick
Administrator
Definately Jodi Jones. I trust him implicitly on that. Trust me. With regards to transfer rules outside the Windows in general? I think NW has blown that one wide open
Yes, but surely we wanted to play Jones this season? Hence it is different.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
'In principle' isn;t really the same, though, is it.
steve82
Well-Known Member
Definately Jodi Jones. I trust him implicitly on that. Trust me. With regards to transfer rules outside the Windows in general? I think NW has blown that one wide open
In palace deal the league rules would of prevented a non league team (Margate) from selling a player, could be the difference between life or death for a non league club. Hence why non league teams are not bound by the transfer window.
Thats most likely why is needs premier league and football league approval.
Transfer is not gonna impact palaces season
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
It's the difference between life and death for league clubs too.
You can sign a player whenever, you just can't play them if they've signed after the window.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Anyway we'll find out whether it's not a Chris Marsden later on, won;t we.
Nick
Administrator
So we should have signed Jones but not played him?
We don't even know the terms do we before getting all worked up about it.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
I'm afraid to say it's not me getting worked up and trying to find excuses. I am just stating the options available, and how it reads.
Nick
Administrator
Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
Surely it's fairly simple??
You sign a player permanently in the transfer windows, you can play them whenever.
You sign a player permanently outside of the transfer windows, you cannot play them until the next window opens.
If you want to sign a player permanently outside of the transfer windows and play them, you need to sign them on loan with a view to a permanent deal once the window opens.
You sign a player permanently in the transfer windows, you can play them whenever.
You sign a player permanently outside of the transfer windows, you cannot play them until the next window opens.
If you want to sign a player permanently outside of the transfer windows and play them, you need to sign them on loan with a view to a permanent deal once the window opens.
steve82
Well-Known Member
Quite right the way clubs are run these days. ( I'm gonna regret putting that comment on this site )
I've heard of some loan deals that have cash involved too.... I've tried a quick search of rules on transfers but found nothing concrete.
Maybe daggenham are financially sound and are happy to wait for a higher fee come july 1st rather than a panicked deal now
steve82
Well-Known Member
Keep the peace...
too many hot headed conversations on here. No one no's it all, we may just learn something to expand our knowledge.
I doubt anyone on here is a football agent who knows the full ins and outs.
SkyBlueScottie
Well-Known Member
Why does everybody remember the one that got away? we signed Leon Clarke in exactly the same circumstances.
MusicDating
Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
http://www.stevephelps1987.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/chris-marsden-one-city-let-slip-away.html
I remember being absolutely gutted that we let him slip for such a trivial amount of money. Mind you, if the rumours about his exit from Wolves were true, maybe we got lucky.
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
TM and MV have "Waxed lyrical" about how good this boy is. If he is as good as they both say, why didn't we buy him and leave him on "Loan" till the next window? Common sense to me. We haven't signed him but now have seen how good he really is.... Such a pity that every Club in Britain now have too.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Do tell!
steve82
Well-Known Member
Struggling to understand you... It's like you want the deal to fall through.
I'm gonna stick my neck out and say TM, MV have secured the deal.
Surely its not paddy the Greek and sunglasses Ron doing the deal!
My take is bring him in on loan to develop him our way, get him up to speed used to the ground, facilities and training regimes and game time, hence the loan part of the deal. Seems a straight forward deal.
Shoot me if this all goes tits up like you seem to indicate it will.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
I'd be amazed if they hadn't.
Just the words 'in principle' are slightly nervy ones to use!
(were they always in the ccfc website article on him signing btw?!?)
skybluegod
Well-Known Member
The deal is agreed just not signed its really as simple as that
Sent from my VF-895N using Tapatalk
Sent from my VF-895N using Tapatalk
MusicDating
Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Suppose tbf it'd explain why we took him on loan first, and why Southampton got rid.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Still, at least we got Sandy Robertson done and dusted.
MusicDating
Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
I guess he'd sorted himself out by the time he got to Southampton and finally realised his potential.
And yes, Sandy Robertson...
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Yeah I got it the wrong way round, confused him coming to us, from them.
Thankfully Google can allow me to elegantly pretend I remembered all along it was Huddersfield
Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
The extreme opposite Steve. Why not pay the pennies and sign him up. That way he's ours. Why risk other Clubs seeing him play on TV? Seeing how good he is and stealing him from us. Situation Sounds good in principle, but could turn out s**t for us if we, as someone has suggested could happen(Get gazumped)
Nick
Administrator
Because if we bought him, he wouldn't have been able to play until next season.
This way he gets to play for us, then we buy him at the end of the season.
