Palace able to sign him as you cannot make changes to 25 man named squad list... Loop hole triggered.
Due to registration window rules, Freddie will not be eligible to play for Crystal Palace’s senior team until July 1st so he will spend the remainder of this season playing development and behind-closed-door games and adjusting back to the life of full-time football. We look forward to the 2016/2017 season and seeing how this exciting next stage of Freddie’s career progresses.
According to Skybluegod nothing is down in writing, and take it from me, he knows what he's talking about.
He can't play for them though can he?
Not this season no, 25 man squad was named and cannot be changed till end of the season.
In regards to the jodi Jones deal or transfer rules outside the Windows in general?
He can't play for them though can he?
Different to the Jones deal then, I assume we wanted him to be able to play anyway so is completely different
Not really. The deal was always a loan, with it being made a permanent contract in the summer.
Now where are you prevented from putting the latter half of that in writing?
Different to the Jones deal then, I assume we wanted him to be able to play anyway so is completely different
Definately Jodi Jones. I trust him implicitly on that. Trust me. With regards to transfer rules outside the Windows in general? I think NW has blown that one wide open
Do we know it isn't?
Definately Jodi Jones. I trust him implicitly on that. Trust me. With regards to transfer rules outside the Windows in general? I think NW has blown that one wide open
He can't. You can sign a player on a permanent deal whenever you feel like it, however.
In palace deal the league rules would of prevented a non league team (Margate) from selling a player, could be the difference between life or death for a non league club. Hence why non league teams are not bound by the transfer window.
Thats most likely why is needs premier league and football league approval.
Transfer is not gonna impact palaces season
It's the difference between life and death for league clubs too.
You can sign a player whenever, you just can't play them if they've signed after the window.
So we should have signed Jones but not played him?
We don't even know the terms do we before getting all worked up about it.
I'm afraid to say it's not me getting worked up and trying to find excuses. I am just stating the options available, and how it reads.
It's the difference between life and death for league clubs too.
You can sign a player whenever, you just can't play them if they've signed after the window.
So we should have signed Jones but not played him?
We don't even know the terms do we before getting all worked up about it.
I'm afraid to say it's not me getting worked up and trying to find excuses. I am just stating the options available, and how it reads.
Anyway we'll find out whether it's not a Chris Marsden later on, won;t we.
Yes, but surely we wanted to play Jones this season? Hence it is different.
Mind you, if the rumours about his exit from Wolves were true, maybe we got lucky.
TM and MV have "Waxed lyrical" about how good this boy is. If he is as good as they both say, why didn't we buy him and leave him on "Loan" till the next window? Common sense to me. We haven't signed him but now have seen how good he really is.... Such a pity that every Club in Britain now have too.
Struggling to understand you... It's like you want the deal to fall through.
I'm gonna stick my neck out and say TM, MV have secured the deal.
Surely its not paddy the Greek and sunglasses Ron doing the deal!
My take is bring him in on loan to develop him our way, get him up to speed used to the ground, facilities and training regimes and game time, hence the loan part of the deal. Seems a straight forward deal.
Shoot me if this all goes tits up like you seem to indicate it will.
Do tell!
http://www.molineuxmix.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?p=250552 and page 4. Heard this years back as well.
Suppose tbf it'd explain why we took him on loan first, and why Southampton got rid.
I guess he'd sorted himself out by the time he got to Southampton and finally realised his potential.
And yes, Sandy Robertson...
Struggling to understand you... It's like you want the deal to fall through.
I'm gonna stick my neck out and say TM, MV have secured the deal.
Surely its not paddy the Greek and sunglasses Ron doing the deal!
My take is bring him in on loan to develop him our way, get him up to speed used to the ground, facilities and training regimes and game time, hence the loan part of the deal. Seems a straight forward deal.
Shoot me if this all goes tits up like you seem to indicate it will.
The extreme opposite Steve. Why not pay the pennies and sign him up. That way he's ours. Why risk other Clubs seeing him play on TV? Seeing how good he is and stealing him from us. Situation Sounds good in principle, but could turn out s**t for us if we, as someone has suggested could happen(Get gazumped)
Transfer is not gonna impact palaces season
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?