They have probably already asked for them and been denied hence it ending up in court.
If the council lost the JR and have were shown to of misused taxpayers money, would the council leaders have to resign and would new leaders have a different attitude towards bringing the club back to playing in Coventry
running rings around your beloved council in admin process?
what about beating higgs claim to boot?
oh no you will just ignore that till council finally win one and then post about it till the end of time.
Lol !!!
You must be so proud our club is playing in Northampton !!
why would i be?
why would you even say such a stupid thing? back it up.
running rings around your beloved council in admin process?
what about beating higgs claim to boot?
oh no you will just ignore that till council finally win one and then post about it till the end of time.
Again you're talking about sisu beating the other parties in court and now about running rings around the council during the admin process.
I'll ask you again. How has any of this benefited our club?
it hasnt. where did i say it did though???????
john is making out like they are muppets and council are so smart, i am pointing out that is not the case.
sisu have messed ccfc around, me thinking they know what they are doing in courtroom does not mean i like them.
As you quite rightly say there has been no benefit to the club so why are you relishing in this apparent "battering" and "running of rings".
You seem to have forgotten why you support the team. Assuming you do of course and are not just here for a bit of council bashing.
There seems to be a recurring theme from some people that they have seen a document/s which prove sisu will win
running rings around your beloved council in admin process?
what about beating higgs claim to boot?
oh no you will just ignore that till council finally win one and then post about it till the end of time.
What on earth are you talking about?
Acl have already beat sisu in court.
Higgs didn't lose to sisu in court, and the case cost sisu a lot more to defend than it did higgs.
Sisu have never beat anyone in court whilst posing as our clubs owner.
so, what does everyone think ?
a) SISU win
b) CCC win / no case to answer
Honestly, I think the court will throw out the case. SISU will frustrate the hell out of the judge, trying to introduce irrelevant information. Costs awarded against SISU. SISU don't pay, and file an irrelevant appeal based on the judges decision not to allow all SISUs "evidence".
Again you're talking about sisu beating the other parties in court and now about running rings around the council during the admin process.
I'll ask you again. How has any of this benefited our club?
I am waiting to see if they pay the 590k before the end of the month.
sitting here in a very wet north yorkshire I have followed most of this pub like legal talk through the biased views - the one thing that convinces me is of the apparant legal abilities surrounding the two sides
SISU - professional solicitors proactive successful in court because they are the best whether we like it or not SISU are a successful company and employ the top legal
CCC legal historically like comfort of the easier life not having to be proactive rather than succeed on own ability hide in the security of a regular income without fighting for it
well thats my impression historically of council departments
to me there can only be one winner SISU - they are not stupid enough to just waste more money. their legal know the law and loop holes
they didn't lose the other cases just didn't prove.
my monies on SISU so come on CCC admit guilt as charged and negotiate
there is no way I am a SISU lover just looking at the facts - CCC did give the money and it is contrary to what is allowed stop wasting council money
CCC only hope is the smokescreen of non disclosure
YES THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION FROM YEARS OF OBSERVATION OF ISSUES BETWEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE PUBLIC IN GENERAL
my concern id CCFC and the only way we can move forward in the short term is a SISU win in court
sitting here in a very wet north yorkshire I have followed most of this pub like legal talk through the biased views - the one thing that convinces me is of the apparant legal abilities surrounding the two sides
SISU - professional solicitors proactive successful in court because they are the best whether we like it or not SISU are a successful company and employ the top legal
CCC legal historically like comfort of the easier life not having to be proactive rather than succeed on own ability hide in the security of a regular income without fighting for it
well thats my impression historically of council departments
to me there can only be one winner SISU - they are not stupid enough to just waste more money. their legal know the law and loop holes
they didn't lose the other cases just didn't prove.
my monies on SISU so come on CCC admit guilt as charged and negotiate
there is no way I am a SISU lover just looking at the facts - CCC did give the money and it is contrary to what is allowed stop wasting council money
CCC only hope is the smokescreen of non disclosure
YES THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION FROM YEARS OF OBSERVATION OF ISSUES BETWEEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE PUBLIC IN GENERAL
my concern id CCFC and the only way we can move forward in the short term is a SISU win in court
they didn't lose the other cases just didn't prove.
If there was no 'contrary to rules' there wouldn't be a court case - no ive not seen the evidence am not a legal professional as i stated its my opinion based on my experiences of dealings with councils and courts
The only thing that matters is the judgement, what a poster on here thinks is irrelevant.
unless of course the judge is a poster on here ?
unless of course the judge is a poster on here ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?