You can expect what the hell you want. If its the right appointment ill applaud it appropriately. But I'll always hold the opinion that the way it was handled was a disaster. For which Waggott holds responsibility
Ridiculous. Absoloutley ridiculous. He was by far our best defender until he was dropped from the side for some reason. He was afraid to go in for a challenge like Brown and Wood seem to be. He isnt costing us the earth in wages and he's a damn sight better than brown so why kick him out?
And nobody here's disputing that-so what's your problem?
To be clear then, you hold Waggott primarily responsible for our current league position?
Secondarily-Thorn does not get absolved of blame in this mess.
I didn't for one moment think you would. But I said 'primarily'. If you think of much of Robins as I think you do, then you'd conclude with him at the helm from the start of the season we'd be further up the table.
If that's the case, not making the decision on a sensible basis is the crux of our current plight; which surely makes it 'primarily' Waggott's fault, no?
Can we stop talking about Thorn!
He's moved on with his life, why can't people move on with theirs lol
Can we stop talking about Thorn!
He's moved on with his life, why can't people move on with theirs lol
Calling Nimley and Norwood unknown kid is laughable.
But that wasn't accepted as an excuse last season for Thorn when he was managing mostly Colemans/Aidys players. I know he was scout but the players were scouted under different criteria depending on what the current manager was looking for, for his style of play. When these players underperformed the current manager at the time was taking the stickTrouble is, he brought 9 new players in. While any of these 9 players continue to under-perform the trail is always going to lead back to him.
Until it is Robins with his team this is going to run and run and run. Going to just have to get used to it I'm afraid.
Norwood had played at league 1 level before we signed him on loan, we were the only championship club willing to take the risk on him and he was fantastic for us so was a good signing by the manager and club?Calling Nimley and Norwood unknown kid is laughable.
But that wasn't accepted as an excuse last season for Thorn when he was managing mostly Colemans/Aidys players. I know he was scout but the players were scouted under different criteria depending on what the current manager was looking for, for his style of play. When these players underperformed the current manager at the time was taking the stick
Only 2 of of the 9 summer signings started vs MK Dons and 3 of Robins loans started this game so the team vs MK Dons consisted more of Robins summer signings that Thorns
Norwood had played at league 1 level before we signed him on loan, we were the only championship club willing to take the risk on him and he was fantastic for us so was a good signing by the manager and club?
Norwood was relatively unknown when we signed him, we gave him the platform to create a career for him at championship level
Aren't you always defending Adams when Wise is mentioned as the reason we did well saying we should give him credit for the signing? Surely this is a similar situation?
No-one has stated that; but ludicrous though that sounds - that's the way Thorn's vilified on here
We do need to draw a line under all this, but it was clear Andy Thorn was simply not up to the job and I will be very surprised if he ever gets a job in football management again.
All the excuses in the world do not hide the fact that he came up woefully short of what was required to manage a football club.
Yes, Waggot is included when I said a good signing by the club.How was Norwood relatively unknown?
I am confused how it works though now...it seems that whoever had the role Waggot now holds should have been given the credit. Now that it seems the responsibility is down to Waggot, shouldn't Waggot be praised for bringing Norwood & Nimley into the club?
I wouldn't disagree with that, what my point I was trying to make in my last post is that we shouldn't use Thorn's signings to defend Robins if things don't go to plan. As I pointed out the team vs Dons was as much Robins own team as well as ThornsWe do need to draw a line under all this, but it was clear Andy Thorn was simply not up to the job and I will be very surprised if he ever gets a job in football management again.
All the excuses in the world do not hide the fact that he came up woefully short of what was required to manage a football club.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?