2300 ish. Looked right from my view
They've got nothing to gain from overestimation though, have they? Wouldn't they have to pay more tax?
I have to admit though I was surprised how many they said were there.
They've got nothing to gain from overestimation though, have they? Wouldn't they have to pay more tax?
I have to admit though I was surprised how many they said were there.
They've got nothing to gain from overestimation though, have they? Wouldn't they have to pay more tax?
I have to admit though I was surprised how many they said were there.
You don't pay tax on a loss, you get a rebate.
So, a very mild night against the league leaders, with vastly reduced ticket prices and still only 1600 City fans turn up.
People are remaining steadfast and the only answer is for the club to get back to Coventry sharpish. There are never going to be the numbers at Northampton to make this thing sustainable.
They've got nothing to gain from overestimation though, have they? Wouldn't they have to pay more tax?
I have to admit though I was surprised how many they said were there.
they say they dont need numbers, they have funding
not sure if thats true or not.
They've got nothing to gain from overestimation though, have they? Wouldn't they have to pay more tax?
Never understand the desperation of some to disbelieve an attendance figure like that.
Some people have a fixation with counting. People used to regularly post how many were on the hill exactly at certain times, I wouldn't put it past people to start doing their own counts of fans.
you don't get a rebate, unless some tax has been paid in the first placeYou don't pay tax on a loss, you get a rebate.
Is it really so difficult to see why it matters how many City fans attend Sixfields?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?