I don't blame him now and I didn't blame him one jot at the time either. Strangely though it's now for differing reasons.
Originally, I didn't blame him because football is a business (you may or may not like that fact but it's true) and he is just an employee at a company. He was doing a job, and he had a better offer come through from a better company offering better wages. If Robins worked at Homebase and was offered a job at B&Q doing exactly the same thing for more money, nobody would question him leaving. Since it's football though, it should be completely different, and he should adore his club regardless of wage (apparently). The whole loyalty in football thing is nonsense. Owners treat managers like dirt, managers sometimes treat players like dirt (the treatment of Marcus Hall in his latter days springs to mind), and players treat clubs like dirt. It's a vicious cycle and until those at the top (club owners) show more loyalty, why should the staff under the company show loyalty back?
Anyway, that's why I had no issues with him leaving before. Now though, I have no issues with him leaving because it is 100% clear as day that what he said about asking for assurances and not getting them is in my mind true (I may be incorrect, but my opinion is that his answer has merit). He seems to have jumped from the sinking ship the second the captain refused to say they hadn't hit an iceberg. He has to have his job security at heart and it seems to me that the long term security of this club is currently in jeopardy. Actually, it seems that the SHORT-term security of the club is looking pretty bleak! We can't be sure exactly what assurances Robins was seeking, but considering there are financial troubles hanging over us and considering the current rent problem too, I really don't blame him for leaving.