That is all true but we have just offloaded Palmers wages and not replaced him with any positionPut yourself in Kings shoes as the owner of a loss making operation.
Robins “can I have cash for Torp, Bassette, Mason-Clark, Thomas-Asante, Binks, Dovin and Rodrigues. Can you reject offers for Simms, Wright, Van Ewijk and Sheaf.
Doug “done”.
Robins “actually forget Torp can I have more money for James now”.
The difference in professionalism between Palmer and James is huge also.But he doesnt ned money. Just wages which have been saved by selling KP
Jesus we have some post window revisionism going on here.
Let’s be honest if we had signed James early in the window as our new midfielder we would all have been underwhelmed.
I can totally understand King saying no we can buy better and younger. We would all have thought we could.
However now that we haven’t and the window is shut and Sheaf has highlighted what we are missing I think James would be an ok stop gap but that’s it.
I'm not sure many of those player's have Mr demanding them just nodding his head!Put yourself in Kings shoes as the owner of a loss making operation.
Robins “can I have cash for Torp, Bassette, Mason-Clark, Thomas-Asante, Binks, Dovin and Rodrigues. Can you reject offers for Simms, Wright, Van Ewijk and Sheaf.
Doug “done”.
Robins “actually forget Torp can I have more money for James now”.
He played when there was no one there didn't he? So not much chance for anyone to make a song popular for him.Can’t recall having a song for MJ. Do we have one to dust off or too soon to add a new one to the repertoire?
I would say most of those were Doug's idea with a view to making a profit in the future. MR wouldn't say no to extra depth in attack but as said, some of that money should have gone to provide more balance across the team.Robins “can I have cash for Torp, Bassette, Mason-Clark, Thomas-Asante, Binks, Dovin and Rodrigues.
I think we were looking at James McConnell from Liverpool until he got unfortunately injuredThe Stamenic deal falling through still has ripples. As it was so public (from RS Belgrade) we were on the verge on signing him, it became obvious to Browne he was only a 'back up' plan. The vibes were that Browne wanted to join, but then turned away when he felt slighted (understandably). We are then behind the curve with CM recruitment, took a shot at Bernede but Lausanne don't want/need to sell (owned by INEOS).
Sheaf then gets crocked and we are looking mighty thin in midfield.
We are, where we are now. But, this is an example of where the loan policy needs to be relaxed.
The Stamenic deal falling through still has ripples. As it was so public (from RS Belgrade) we were on the verge on signing him, it became obvious to Browne he was only a 'back up' plan. The vibes were that Browne wanted to join, but then turned away when he felt slighted (understandably). We are then behind the curve with CM recruitment, took a shot at Bernede but Lausanne don't want/need to sell (owned by INEOS).
Sheaf then gets crocked and we are looking mighty thin in midfield.
We are, where we are now. But, this is an example of where the loan policy needs to be relaxed.
How do you know what Browne was thinking? We may not even have been in for him.
Stamenic didn't want to come here, so ultimately it's irrelevant because there's no point signing a player that doesn't want to be at the club.
We were
We have 5 senior central midfielders. That's incredibly thin.It depends what you consider success….
we strengthened our Keeper, out wide on both flanks, the striking options and made Binks perm.
We didn’t sell any of our key players.
we managed to offload Godden and Palmer for fees.
That’s a good window, maybe even a very good window. If we had added a great number 6 or 8 that would have made it a brilliant window.
failing to land one target doesn’t make all other progress irrelevant …..
The decision to sell Palmer with no one to replace his minutes is honestly shocking and overshadows the rest of our business.
Very true. if we had signed a midfielder in the window nobody would care we had sold palmer reallyRobins himself said he didn't think we'd miss him and we don't - he can't play the roles we need so it's not really "honestly shocking". The more pertinent issue is the reoccurence of Sheaf's injury.
Robins himself said he didn't think we'd miss him and we don't - he can't play the roles we need so it's not really "honestly shocking". The more pertinent issue is the reoccurence of Sheaf's injury.
Some, sure, but most have seen through Palmer by this point.The more shocking thing is the complete about-face of some fans, from Palmer being a luxury liability to absolutely crucial to the clubs success.
This. There was noise it was longer than "2 weeks" OR back for Watford as MR said. Robins said he hurt his toe or similar after game, turner reported ankle injury recurrenceRobins himself said he didn't think we'd miss him and we don't - he can't play the roles we need so it's not really "honestly shocking". The more pertinent issue is the reoccurence of Sheaf's injury.
If he can't play the roles we need how did he play over 50% of our minutes before leaving?Robins himself said he didn't think we'd miss him and we don't - he can't play the roles we need so it's not really "honestly shocking". The more pertinent issue is the reoccurence of Sheaf's injury.
No one is saying that, in a vacuum it's a good deal for us. But given how light we are in midfield we needed a body in just to play some minutes.The more shocking thing is the complete about-face of some fans, from Palmer being a luxury liability to absolutely crucial to the clubs success.
Think they probably take BTA to occupy the minutes criteria in replacement terms?Very true. if we had signed a midfielder in the window nobody would care we had sold palmer really
Some, sure, but most have seen through Palmer by this point.
If he can't play the roles we need how did he play over 50% of our minutes before leaving?
No one is saying that, in a vacuum it's a good deal for us. But given how light we are in midfield we needed a body in just to play some minutes.
If he can't play the roles we need how did he play over 50% of our minutes before leaving?
No one is saying that, in a vacuum it's a good deal for us. But given how light we are in midfield we needed a body in just to play some minutes.
Thats what he reported - a recurrence.Robins said he hurt a toe in training, so where did Turnip get a recurrence from??
Let's hope so, cos other sides will get wind and try to get him, knowing our luck.My reliable source seems to think this talk is behind the curve and it’s actually been signed and sealed…
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?