Depends whether you welcomed them in the first place!
SISU's original plan was to get to the Premiership; they bottled that and lost a lot of money in the process. What we are seeing now ( and for the last 2 years) is in my opinion plan B- which is to get as much money back as posible and not sink any more in.
I don't understand why some are so against something that might help the club stay in Coventry. Isn't that what we all want?
I can see it now in SISU HQ "How does he know about the details of plan b? Listen up, Operation Suicide has been compromised......."
In the answers given to the Trust it's revealed that they wouldn't agree anything with ACL if it meant SISU had to put any more in.
It was also ACL who said no to arbitration, albeit the club put lots of conditions in their answer.
You'd have to ask why ACL would be against arbitration if they were so confident their offer was the fairest possible.
Call the club's bluff if they don't believe they'd actually sit down and agree to be bound by it. if they're so confident it wouldn't hurt their case, why not? Expose them for the sham they are, push them to binding arbitration.
Or... refuse to consider it.
In which case to the objective outsider, there's one side being more obstructive to a deal being thrashed out than the other, and it ain't the club.
ACL lowered the rent offer massively yet the other side moved not one dot?
It was also ACL who said no to arbitration, albeit the club put lots of conditions in their answer.
You'd have to ask why ACL would be against arbitration if they were so confident their offer was the fairest possible.
Call the club's bluff if they don't believe they'd actually sit down and agree to be bound by it. if they're so confident it wouldn't hurt their case, why not? Expose them for the sham they are, push them to binding arbitration.
Or... refuse to consider it.
In which case to the objective outsider, there's one side being more obstructive to a deal being thrashed out than the other, and it ain't the club.
Why do all you sisu rent boys now want arbitration????
Sisu had their chance and fecked it up. Time to move on!!!
We only have their word for that, not a legally binding agreement with an arbitrator.
What are they afraid of by introducing a third party, if they're 100% in the right?
This of course assumes that the owners actually see the rent as an important issue rather than use its withholding as an attempt to bust ACL.
We don't only have their word for that fisher said he was happy with £ 400,000 but wanted extras
We do, so why so afraid of a chance for that to be tested?
I take it you are suggesting we cannot take fishers word for anything
I think most people would Want a solution as long as sisu are not involved.
They have destroyed our club!!!
I wouldn't take anybody's press release as gospel truth, there's always an agenda.
Agreed, yet we cannot be selective about who said they would or wouldn'tagree arbitration /mediation on that basis, just through their press rerleases
We can be certain that ACL rejected it!
How if you cannot believe press releases?
That applies to both sides about whoever says whatever
So they said no but meant yes?
Sounds a bit like a Marlon King view of the world that.
We only have their word for that, not a legally binding agreement with an arbitrator.
What are they afraid of by introducing a third party, if they're 100% in the right?
Stop bleating about nothing you SISU fool, they tried to bust their way to the real estate, their bluff was called, no one wants them. They've failed and now they need to move on !
Stop talking utter bollox then !
There is nothing polite to say about the cretinous hedge fund that have utterly trashed my football club, no one wants them to stay.....................no one !!
Northern wisdom wants sisu to stay!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?