Also, what about the fans who have said they have given up on CCFC now and would never go back? They are the ones who are the disgrace, not the ones on the hill or in the ground.
How are those fans a disgrace? What did they do to cause the club to be playing in the 3rd division in Northampton?
How can someone be considered a disgrace for saying "If playing home games 35 miles away is my reward for following the club through 10 years of decline, then I have had enough - there are many more things I could do with my leisure time".
How are those fans a disgrace? What did they do to cause the club to be playing in the 3rd division in Northampton?
How can someone be considered a disgrace for saying "If playing home games 35 miles away is my reward for following the club through 10 years of decline, then I have had enough - there are many more things I could do with my leisure time".
Even so though, 500 members is a very small minority of fans so to use headlines of "More Misery for SISU" is just misleading.
if you look at the current "home" gates thats about 25%
if you look at the current "home" gates thats about 25%
I am not saying they did anything to cause it, BUT to just blatently give up and say you don't support them any more is a bit strong. I can understand the people saying they wont go until they are back in CCFC and even to an extent the ones who say they wont come until SISU go, but to say you don't care any more and would never support them again and don't care is a bit strong?
But only 5% of last season?
I am not saying they did anything to cause it, BUT to just blatently give up and say you don't support them any more is a bit strong. I can understand the people saying they wont go until they are back in CCFC and even to an extent the ones who say they wont come until SISU go, but to say you don't care any more and would never support them again and don't care is a bit strong?
i really believe people are underestimating the hatred of sisu,It's all bluster. Majority of those will come back if we were back in Coventry. You can't just switch it off like that.
We averaged 10,800 last season including away fans, so approx 10k home fans.
1700 ccfc fans at Sixfields last week = 17% of last seasons home crowd.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
Who were the people asked?
Out of those who say they are finished with the club, CCFC no longer exists, they will only go if we return to the Ricoh and SISU leave
I'd bet 99% hadn't attended the Ricoh in years and this is just there latest excuse not to go after 'not goin until King leaves' 'not going until Boothroyd/Coleman/Thorn is sacked' etc
Sure, more than welcome to make a poll. I think to get the best view it should be a poll on here, facebook, gmk, telegraph and the results merged to get the fairest result.
Sending a poll to kcic members and followers is going to show those sorts of results isn't it? It's like walking across the hill asking what people think and then saying that all city fans agree.
Why are we comparing against last seasons average? Current crowds are about 90% down on sisu taking over.
Are we saying to those 17-18k fans that you dont matter?
They have as much right to vote on this as those who attended last season, which would make these figures look a lot more accurate.
With all these figures being chucked around: (i) will tomorrow be the first time in our history that the number of City fans at an away league game is greater than our home average attendance (including the away fans in the home average); (ii) one way of doing a more scientific poll would be to focus on people who attended games at home last season - the club must have a complete record of season ticker holders and then people who bought tickets for say 20 home games, 10-20, under 10 (I guess people who repeatedly paid cash on the day wouldn't be captured anywhere but there can't be that many of them). I'd be very happy to do all the work on it but the club don't seem to like me very much so if someone could persuade them to get involved that would be great!
Yeah sadly I doubt the results of a poll would end the current SISU campaign of NOPM against ACL.To be fair, you are drawing muppet picturesIf you stood around abusing me all day I probably wouldn't like you
I doubt the club would release the info but the best way is to get the survey filled in by as many people as possible across all CCFC sites to get a broader view.
The thing at the end of it though, is what is the poll going to achieve? What can we do with the information?
I was responding to Skybluetony 176 who stated this poll represented 25% of current fans at Sixfields.
Poll conducted by Michael Orton, a researcher at the University Of Warwick, finds a third will continue to boycott games until there is a change of ownership
He contacted 2,500 people on the KCIC mailing list and received a response which exceeded his greatest expectations.
Have just seen the telegraph article and it is VERY misleading - http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...-news/survey-majority-sky-blues-fans-6070444?
What has working at the uni got to do with anything?
It then goes on to say
It is literally just twisting things to read how they want to be read.
This is the kind of stuff that isn't needed, people moan about the spin of SISU and ACL and this is just as bad.
Have just seen the telegraph article and it is VERY misleading - http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...-news/survey-majority-sky-blues-fans-6070444?
What has working at the uni got to do with anything?
It then goes on to say
It is literally just twisting things to read how they want to be read.
This is the kind of stuff that isn't needed, people moan about the spin of SISU and ACL and this is just as bad.
Personally I think the biggest stat that is currently being overlooked is the fact that 4 out of 5 fans didn't even respond....
.....and keep in mind that the 2500 that were sent the questionnaire must have very recently been involved, or at least interested enough in our plight to join the trust & not opt out of the kcic mails.....
so in summary, 80% of our most ardent fan base couldn't give a shit about this poll.....
Personally I think the biggest stat that is currently being overlooked is the fact that 4 out of 5 fans didn't even respond....
.....and keep in mind that the 2500 that were sent the questionnaire must have very recently been involved, or at least interested enough in our plight to join the trust & not opt out of the kcic mails.....
so in summary, 80% of our most ardent fan base couldn't give a shit about this poll.....
So a response rate of 20%-25%?[/QUOT
Personally I think the biggest stat that is currently being overlooked is the fact that 4 out of 5 fans didn't even respond....
.....and keep in mind that the 2500 that were sent the questionnaire must have very recently been involved, or at least interested enough in our plight to join the trust & not opt out of the kcic mails.....
so in summary, 80% of our most ardent fan base couldn't give a shit about this poll.....
Yes, let's misread the survey to the extreme.
How many who responded are attending the games at sixfields? 25%?
Ouch is it not what you wanted to here as you said people could't even b e bothered to respond or even opt out of KCIK what does that tell you?
Not that they find it irrelevant like yourself thou some will, but that they are losing interest in CCFC the longer this goes on the more that will not case.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?