No covenant needs to be changed see #482 - CCC reported it wanted to insert a covenant and then found it could not
But A) The club hasn't applied to have any covenant changed or applied for planning permission. B) Commercially Sensitive information? Isn't the covenant a matter of public record available to anyone at request to the LRO? C) If the club ever did look to change the covenant (no indication as yet that they're even considering it) is the final decision CCC's? Wouldn't that be central government as presumably any change of use and therefore covenant is a planning matter?
And I've said I couldn't give a f**k who is right or wrong, they're all as bad as one another. simple as that. It's all about point scoring on here f**k all to do with debates just slag off someone you don't like! or has a different view to you.
Where have I slagged you off?
I have actually said you were MISLED !!
If you see something that is totally wrong would you let that go without correcting it?
Yup, just like work.
You're doing your bestI've already said i've shown one account of goings on at the Butts. I really couldn't give a f**k what anyone believes I stated (Don't shoot the messenger for the fifth time) but it seems you're all good at oneupmanship eh
Where have I said you?
Now stop bickering !
Coventry City Council have responded to a leaked email saying that it was attempting to block Coventry City from playing at the Butts Park Arena.
According to the Coventry Telegraph's Simon Gilbert, "Coventry City Council can't block change in Butts Park Arena lease to allow Coventry City to ground share with Coventry Rugby Club but changes in rent between leases would have to be approved by councillors"
A leaked email to the rugby club in January 2016, said the council wanted a new clause inserted which would specifically prevent “professional association football or training associated therewith” in exchange for making other changes to the sub-lease.
The Coventry Telegraph asked Nigel Clews, assistant director of property and asset management at Coventry City Council, why they had tried to insert the clause at that time and he said: “No, it doesn’t look good. But we were trying to flush out details.
In red - twice
↑
Who said it was?
I have posted that answer several times over several threads but it continues to be ignored
Some people do not like the idea the Council were caught lying - which is what it was
And I've said I couldn't give a f**k who is right or wrong, they're all as bad as one another. simple as that. It's all about point scoring on here f**k all to do with debates just slag off someone you don't like! or has a different view to you.
You're doing your best
This enough?.... Mr Millerchip, a former Coventry Rugby Club player, donated thousands of pounds to the club when the outfit was struggling financially. He currently owns Coventry Rugby Properties LLP, which owns the 125-year lease from Coventry City Council for the Butts Park Arena site. That lease contains restrictions which mean the site can only currently be used by a rugby club.
Semi-pro, they pay some players appearance fees.Coventry United are not a Pro outfit Nick.
In red - twice
↑
Who said it was?
I have posted that answer several times over several threads but it continues to be ignored
Some people do not like the idea the Council were caught lying - which is what it was
And I've said I couldn't give a f**k who is right or wrong, they're all as bad as one another. simple as that. It's all about point scoring on here f**k all to do with debates just slag off someone you don't like! or has a different view to you.
I wouldn't have a clue mate I only "Put it out there"Does this mean the lease can only be held by a rugby club without imposing a ban on other sports/activities.
Other events take place there, certainly the CAMRA Beer festival for around the last 10 years and I see a Comedy Club an upcoming Fireworks display .
Semi-pro, they pay some players appearance fees.
Sums of £200/match have been mentioned.
That discussions were going on between CRFC and CCFC at all was something that was commercially sensitive.
He's made a twat of himself and even UKIP Tony, despite exchanging mutual likes on this thread has deserted him to his inevitable shafting.
Someone should have told Les Read. He's the one that broke the story wasn't it?
Yep they were caught with their pants down but oddly certain posters on here don't even see it.
I think a direct reply to my post addressed to me with the word "you" used twice is a bit of a give awayThat was not a go at you, it was a generalisation. Or is there anyone else that did a Nick, Oldfiver, and saw it as him personally?
I think a direct reply to my post addressed to me with the word "you" used twice is a bit of a give away
I accept your misuse of the word "you" and have moved on
I wouldn't have a clue mate I only "Put it out there"
Most will be semi-Pro but they won't be getting appearance money but expenses is what it will be termed as, but possibly changed from when I was playing.
Oh it was him now. I thought Gilbert tried to claim that. He seemed pretty sure of himself.
All the first team squad are salaried
Have I really? Let me ask... Who made a twat of themself by passing off estimations as a fact?
Just one question why do you keep up with this ukip thing?I never did. It was a use of a football website to analyse transfer fees. You said you'd "heard" Westwood was transferred for £250,000 and the website showed or believed £700,000 when analysing the accounts. This also agreed with the press versions at the time. I never used the words "estimated facts" - you went on a typical Alf garnet rant and we all laughed at you - ukip Tony is trying to save you but that's like asking for football lessons off graham withey - you are drowning.
Because G would vote for Trump.Just one question why do you keep up with this ukip thing?
Just one question why do you keep up with this ukip thing?
Merely as there are two Tony's - one a legal eagle and the other a ukip supporter - I am merely differentiating between the two to avoid confusion.
Nope, I'm not a brain dead PC slacker am I?Aren't we all?
Well...Nope, I'm not a brain dead PC slacker am I?
I never did. It was a use of a football website to analyse transfer fees. You said you'd "heard" Westwood was transferred for £250,000 and the website showed or believed £700,000 when analysing the accounts. This also agreed with the press versions at the time. I never used the words "estimated facts" - you went on a typical Alf garnet rant and we all laughed at you - ukip Tony is trying to save you but that's like asking for football lessons off graham withey - you are drowning.
LMFAO... You've got to be a sociopath pal. You admitted it on this forum. We all saw it. You said "I believe the website "Estimations" because they are more "Fact" than your "Reported to be" from the newspapers. Hahahaha. I'll find it and show you what a arsehole you really are hahaha.
I've got a link to the thread in question if anyone is bothered.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?