Captain Dart
Well-Known Member
Anybody else got the feeling Matondo is the backup plan if Schlupp doesn't sign?
Why the fuck are we bringing these players to ryton and meeting them when we no in advance what money they are on, he’s absolutely cluelessif you think we have weeks to sign players then you are delusional in January
he was at ryton today
dammed if you do dammed if you don’t post info on here
Sky reporting it this afternoon. That there fault?
if you think we have weeks to sign players then you are delusional in January
he was at ryton today
dammed if you do dammed if you don’t post info on here
Sky reporting it this afternoon. That there fault?
you haven't got an inside source, you get fed bullshit every now and then so people can laugh behind your backlol
you really thick?
look when I posted and look when someone said he posted and deleted
You really are an odd ball
Don’t take everything you see as fact.Why the fuck are we bringing these players to ryton and meeting them when we no in advance what money they are on, he’s absolutely clueless
If he was signing today they’d already be agreed with the club. It’s nothing to do with his personal terms
We need depth, having to change formation because two players got injured isn’t great.A loan is usually taken with a view to playing or else why bother.
In which case, is this a vote of no confidence in Tats? I would totally understand that as I think I can count on the fingers of two hands the number of times this season he has gone to the line and crossed. He doesn't trust either himself or his body. Makes him predictable. EMC has crossed more often and he has played a fraction of the games. And we are now playing wing backs anyway.
Also is this what we should from hereon call the Bassette rule: We really need a CDM, but oh look here's quite a good (some other position).
you haven't got an inside source, you get fed bullshit every now and then so people can laugh behind your back
oh and they laugh, usually in the craven
that says he has agreed to join us which means he has agreed termsare you thick?
Sky reported this
Does that mean Sky got it wrong?
No way a player comes to the training ground and then we figure out we can’t afford the wages.
his sky link says he has already agreed to sign for us, surely wages would have been spoken about?No way a player comes to the training ground and then we figure out we can’t afford the wages.
We're not obviously.Why the fuck are we bringing these players to ryton and meeting them when we no in advance what money they are on, he’s absolutely clueless
You said wright was crap didn't ya? And wanted season to end 2 weeks ago'Surprisingly keen to do him down'
I've literally made one comment ffs. Hardly Eaatenders is it
that says he has agreed to join us which means he has agreed terms
you probably should read the things you post
are you jealous or something?
Thomas was heading here till something last min
Sky even reporting Matondo. does that mean their sources are shit?
strange
I’ve heard this now isn’t happening…
If it’s a loan the deal is thrashed out between the two clubs - he already has his contract - this is a disaster for you
The meeting not going well doesn’t necessarily equate to us not being willing to pay his wages.meeting didn’t go well
I was then told he’s on 30k at Rangers
whatever it is, it’s not looking likely now
No, clearly you got the scoop before we sky and it's trueare you jealous or something?
Thomas was heading here till something last min
Sky even reporting Matondo. does that mean their sources are shit?
strange
Surely not that bad? He's made the bench and even come on, Hillsner didn't even get that far did he?
why is it disaster for me?
meeting didn’t go well. how is that a disaster for me?
maybe we have thought the 30k is not worth the risk
No, clearly you got the scoop before we sky and it's true
What we're all laughing at is that he's travelled all the way to Ryton to tell us he don't wanna join cuz we can't afford him. According to you
You said wright was crap didn't ya? And wanted season to end 2 weeks ago
Just a negative Nancy ain't ya?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?