anyone would have an amazing fanbase if there was only two teams in the running every season yawwwnAmazing fan base.
he'll sign for some obscure turkish side for 35k a week, then come back to UK to sign for charlton in 18months time.Its OFF.
Ask Lampard he said the other day we need wingersI’m still slightly puzzled why we want wingers first. For me central midfield and LB & RB take priority
Its OFF.
I’m still slightly puzzled why we want wingers first. For me central midfield and LB & RB take priority
The new Kevin Drinkell …
I’ll trust our staff if he wasn’t right for us , I’m also generally in favour of not paying over the odds in wages too although sometimes in football it does seem like you need to speculate to accumulate at times. But if it ain’t right that it ain’t right , there will be another one along soon enoughOff to Sunderland now?
You may start to get fuming soonIf we lost out to Blunderland i would be fuming tbf.
It’s pretty simple. We can’t play the formation we want to because of 2 injuries.I’m still slightly puzzled why we want wingers first. For me central midfield and LB & RB take priority
From a call this morning, this deal has hit the buffers , with bonuses etc being brouyinto the equation, instead of a person that hasn’t hardly played this season , being up for the challenge …….normal greed above talent continuing
Not necessarily, plenty of players take a wage cut to go on loan.If it's a loan deal the discussion on wage contribution is between Cov and Rangers not the player. He's already under contract at Rangers so is guaranteed £32k a week.
Not necessarily, plenty of players take a wage cut to go on loan.
Not necessarily, plenty of players take a wage cut to go on loan.
Yes, he's not guaranteed to keep his full wage.That is a contractual discussion between the player and Rangers
no they don't, they'll be discussion over the % of wage paid by each club but the players original contract remains in placeNot necessarily, plenty of players take a wage cut to go on loan.
Not always the caseThey don't because their wages are being paid in full as they're still under contract with their parent club.
That does say that was between him and FulhamNot always the case
Cyrus Christie: Fulham defender took pay cut to join Swansea City on loan
Swansea City head coach Russell Martin praises Cyrus Christie's attitude after revealing the Republic of Ireland international took a pay cut to join on loan from Fulham.www.bbc.co.uk
Yes, he didn't get his full wageThat does say that was between him and Fulham
"But he was always confident it was going to get done. It was about finding the right deal between Fulham and himself, our deal with Fulham was agreed a while ago."
Yes, he didn't get his full wage
I realise that but there are people saying what is the issue if he's guaranteed his full wage anyway. That isn't necessarily the case.The negotiation is with Rangers though not us if that was the case
I suspect sadly that in the background his agent was touting him around to the highest bidder - seems to me that is the way of modern football. I say sadly not in this specific case but more re football agents in generalCould he be haggling over the potential contract with us, should we decide to sign him in the summer. Would those discussions take place yet?
Or could he ask that they take place (the add ons & bonuses), so from his point of view he isn't wasting his time on loan with us when another club maybe prepared to pander to him.
Yes but it proves FP rightYes, he didn't get his full wage
He can't insist on bonuses - he has a contract with Rangers
I realise that but there are people saying what is the issue if he's guaranteed his full wage anyway. That isn't necessarily the case.
We could still have agreed a wage contribution with Rangers and then have issues with things like goal bonuses if he has that in his contract.
Someone on X reckons both Matondo and Schlupp was seen at Ryton today that tweet was posted 40 mins ago, who knows what's going on but I just hope Lampard can get some players inFrank Lampard remains favourite to land Matondo as his first signing.
Sounds like it’s still on just negotiations taking place on the perm (which I still don’t get).Frank Lampard remains favourite to land Matondo as his first signing.
It’s more likely lampard met him, didn’t like his character and thought his personality wouldn’t fit the dressing room
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?