Personally I think Burges form upon his return was generally ok, yes goals were conceded in some game however they were mainly down to inept performances from the whole team rather than him. .
Burge is not good enough if we want to succeed. Simple.
I don't disagree that we need an experienced goalkeeper (Murphy for me) but to blame Burge for majority of the goals conceded is a bit un-fair and not correct. I remember a few goals going in as a result of Stokes either not getting back quick enough or thinking he was John Terry when his back was to goal. Martin was at fault for a good few before he was dropped.
If you weigh it up my argument is that Burge probably kept us in this league with his shop stopping especially within last 10 games of the season.
I still think Burge is a better goalkeeper than many were giving him credit for and he still has scope for improvement with the right coaching and experience. Plus unless Reda was fit our back line was useless and didn't exactly help him out.
Don't agree at all to be honest. I think I saw him pull off 1 amazing save - the rest were just average despite what has been said. I think people just gave him the benefit of the doubt because he was a young goalkeeper chucked in the deep end and yes to an extent you should do that, but in terms of saving our season - that is utter rubbish.
Those saying that Burge would be alright need their head checking. He isn't good enough for this level.
I never once said "he saved our season" but to blame him for the goals conceded in the second half of the season is just as crap. I saw far worse defending than I did bad goalkeeping. If the defenders had any intelligence then they would have protected him a little more, as it was they couldn't protect themselves.
Furthermore, given the choice at the beginning of last season between Allsopp and Burge I know what I would have gone with, Allsopp screwed us up in the first half of the season, that there is no denying.
I agree we need an experienced head for the league games if we are serious of promotion however I would defo keep Burge but play him in all the cup games to still give him that experience.
You prefer Burge to Allsopp?? I admit he had a shaky start (I didn't trust him at all) and his communication was woeful but between the 2 I would definitely choose Allsopp.
Quick question. When you saw bad defending did you ever think "Here we go another goal" or did you think "glad we have Burge in goal to cover this defending!"
I always thought we were going to concede last season, I had no confidence at all in the defending which includes the goalie, that said I thought the same when Allsopp was in goal, I could not stand him, the laziest goalkeeper I have ever saw.
I am just stating that nobody can blame Burge for the goals conceded in the second half of the season. If we continue to defend this new season as we did last then I expect to concede plenty even if we were to have De Gea in goal.
I always thought we were going to concede last season, I had no confidence at all in the defending which includes the goalie, that said I thought the same when Allsopp was in goal, I could not stand him, the laziest goalkeeper I have ever saw.
I am just stating that nobody can blame Burge for the goals conceded in the second half of the season. If we continue to defend this new season as we did last then I expect to concede plenty even if we were to have De Gea in goal.
If we had a team of 'graduates' and local players there would be those peddling excuses for them as they relegated us to the Conference.
Burge conceded many goals at the near post and the last home game was a horror show.
You are not making any sense regarding Alsopp either who also had the same defence in front of him including Webster.
In regards to Allsopp, absolutely correct, he had a defence inc Webster in front of him so why the hell did he never move off his line and when he did he almost strolled out, I don't think I ever saw him run. I'm still not sure what qualities he actually had?
I blame Burge as much as anyone for the goals conceded last season but that's the point, not anymore or any less. It could be argued then if we are to push Burge aside I presume we want Martin gone? Is Stokes a liability? They were as much to blame.
Stokes is a decent player at this level. Nothing special but good enough I think. He had a few off games last year, but he had no real LM in front of him, and when he was pushing forward nobody was covering him.
Would you have preferred to have the other young local lad playing in that position. That would have gone just as well as Burge being in goal.
There seems to be some kind of hang up re being the local lad??? I couldn't give a shit where he's from, the fact is I know what I saw at home especially in the last 10 games of the season and to blame Burge purely for our goals conceded is laughable.
We talk about wanting to see a team fight for promotion this season well then if we are honest none of our defenders are fit for that inc Stokes who lets remember came from Forest Green and in moments last year he played at that level.
That's it isn't it. I don't understand why because he is a young local goalkeeper we should accept his league 2 mediocrity.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?