Coventry RFC's response http://www.coventryrfc.co.uk/board-statement-9th-october-2014
CCC have not done Coventry or it's residents any favours.
CCC have not done Coventry or it's residents any favours.
Coventry RFC's response http://www.coventryrfc.co.uk/board-statement-9th-october-2014
CCC have not done Coventry or it's residents any favours.
tl;dr? - CRFC butthurt that no one told them anything. Detailed NDI's were signed.
They need to stop beingso short sighted, get over it: start building a relationship with Wasps, it is going to do the club great!
Plenty on here who are absolutely fucking delighted.
Plenty on here who are absolutely fucking delighted.
What else could they do? Turning down a solution to a financial problem may have resulted in a judicial review. How's the P.iT.S. Stadium coming on?
How on eart is it going to benefit CRFC? I would love to see them getting higher attendances than Wasps. I will not support the relocation of any sporting team. How can we as CCFC supporters be that hypocritical to support the franchising of any club?
Plenty on here who are absolutely fucking delighted.
Quite easy really. If it turns out we come out of this winning, I am sure we ( at least a large portion of us ) will quietly ignore the fate of others - that is human nature, like it or not.
But apparently there wasn't a financial problem - ACL was profitable and sustainable, according to the council when they took on the loan. Or are you saying that CCC were lying?
As for a Judicial Review, I don't think you really understand how they work. There's no scope for a JR in the circumstances that you're talking about - to start off with where is the party injured by a council decision?
Funnily enough though, one of the central planks of SISU's argument in their JR was that the Council didn't pay fair value when taking over the mortgage (i.e. that CCC paid too much for it). Don't get me wrong, SISU didn't need to go for the JR, and didn't deserve to win it - but what's clear here is that the Council play fast and loose with the truth when it suits them.
Like it or not, the stadium is now more rather than less likely, and it's almost certain to be outside Coventry. Is that something to celebrate?
tl;dr? - CRFC butthurt that no one told them anything. Detailed NDI's were signed.
They need to stop beingso short sighted, get over it: start building a relationship with Wasps, it is going to do the club great!
So you will quietly ignore the fate of ccfc if turns out to be a good deal for your lot?
It isn't human nature at all, not everyone is a selfish as you.
Err .... My lot is CCFC and yes a lot of people are selfish. That's why our species survives. Not moral, but look around you at your fellow humans. Turn on the tele, if you want to see selfish people exploiting others for their own benefit.
But apparently there wasn't a financial problem - ACL was profitable and sustainable, according to the council when they took on the loan. Or are you saying that CCC were lying?
As for a Judicial Review, I don't think you really understand how they work. There's no scope for a JR in the circumstances that you're talking about - to start off with where is the party injured by a council decision?
Funnily enough though, one of the central planks of SISU's argument in their JR was that the Council didn't pay fair value when taking over the mortgage (i.e. that CCC paid too much for it). Don't get me wrong, SISU didn't need to go for the JR, and didn't deserve to win it - but what's clear here is that the Council play fast and loose with the truth when it suits them.
Like it or not, the stadium is now more rather than less likely, and it's almost certain to be outside Coventry. Is that something to celebrate?
Coventry RFC's response http://www.coventryrfc.co.uk/board-statement-9th-october-2014
CCC have not done Coventry or it's residents any favours.
Same as some of the councillors saying they think it will be good for the city. None of them sound certain.How disrespectful of Coventry Rugby Club to have an opinion, as I thought the great intellect Ann Lucas spoke for them, and explained she had heard it would be good for them and Wasps could loan them some players.
No wait a minute she said that having never spoken to them, not knowing their opinion, and clearly not giving a flying f**k about a Club from the City that she claims to love, whilst cosying up to a nice new franchise team.
As Ann said 'today isnt about me'...if only she had realised that none of this was about her, the sad self centered egotist.
Same as some of the councillors saying they think it will be good for the city. None of them sound certain.
It looks a positive statement from them IMHO
Looking at it as an opportunity.
After all do Swansea or Ospreys fans really care on stadium ownership.
Lets take that model and move on.
There would be an injured party if Wasps bid had been rejected purely because CCFC May, at some indefinite future time come back to the Ricoh. I am not an expert on JR's. However I would think that Wasps would use similar arguments to SISU that to reject such an offer would not make commercial sense. The taxpayers may also be aggrieved. The judge said that it was likely that within the length of the lease, a new tenant/ purchaser would arrive when discussing the viability/ risk of the loan. To then reject an offer which takes the responsibility from CCC, based only on a mere possibility of CCFC coming home, especially when the chairman of CCFC constantly spouts on about the new stadium, would look very strange. I would be asking questions if that had happened.
if the stadium is almost certainly to be outside Coventry, then ask TF about that. As far he's concerned it will be 100% outside Coventry. My hope is that, one way or another, SISU end up having to a deal for the Ricoh. Hopefully with goodwill from Wasps. Far from slagging off Wasps, I would be trying to build a relationship and come up with ideas as to how all parties will profit.
Yes they do, as they get full revenues and were not ripped off by their local council. It would be nice if we had ever been offered that model, as we would have moved on.
WE WERE NOT OFFERED THAT MODEL.
And as for getting over it, I abhor franchise teams, clearly you dont, and wont mind if SISU move the club out of the city again.
What happens if we get offered full revenues ?
What happens if we get offered full revenues ?
Most people say it's not sustainable, yet don't know yet what Wasps are even going to be offering. Fisher said it wasn't sustainable before Wasps had even approached the club. Still a lot of conjecture and conclusion jumping going on, duffer. I await with baited breath to Sisu's response to Wasps' approach.I don't think there's much scope for claiming injury because the council refused to sell to Wasps. The council made their case against SISU on the basis of ACL being profitable and sustainable, on that basis is there no obligation on them to sell. Similarly, they could've argued that the benefit to the city of Wasps coming in is unclear (it is), or that there might be damage to one or more of the City's local teams (there may). SISU's JR is on a specific point of law, state aid - it's hard to see a similar point of law that Wasps could hang their hat on. The council are free to sell or not sell their assets as they see fit, generally - if they do decide to sell their duty is to obtain the most they can for them.
How can SISU now do a deal for the Ricoh? They need access, as do Wasps, to the 24/7/365 revenue from the Ricoh. Wasps have bought it, SISU haven't. CCFC will only ever be tenants now at the Ricoh - most seem to think that that isn't sustainable. Fisher's line is that it works for now in L1 but not above that level. What deal could Wasps offer that could change that?
Personally, and this is just me, I'll never support Wasps at the Ricoh. It would be supporting the immorality of franchising, and the damage (or at best restriction of ambition) to both Coventry teams that is now inevitable. My sincere hope is that the franchise goes bust, it deserves no better imho.
Coventry RFC's response http://www.coventryrfc.co.uk/board-statement-9th-october-2014
CCC have not done Coventry or it's residents any favours.
If they are not happy why did there fans not protest outside the CCC.
Remind me how many CovRU fans came to protest on Tuesday.
What really annoys me about this is the Rugby fans are pretty docile bunch when it comes to airing there views and only do it after the damage has been done.
Like I said before.. where are the Wasp protestors??? it's no point airing your disappointment on fans forum if they can't be bothered to get of there arse and march on the streets. If they did that many of the CCFC fans would join them.
Problem with Rugby fans are they are not very vocal.