Nick
Administrator
You could just say what the previous discussions achieved or the actual aims?
NICK IS NEVER WRONG!
I think I’ll just leave it there.
I don't think that the people clamouring for SISU to put money in to the club in January understand it fully Nick. It is a frustration that will repeat itself every transfer window whilst SISU are the owners
The greatest passion for the club exists in the core of fans that go to the matches. Certainly not with the owners
The EFL are hamstrung in this as they are with the woes of any club. They have competition rules that they can enforce but when it comes to anything fundamental they are pretty impotent. Which is something else some fans do not understand, particularly those saying the EFL would or could take the golden share away. They simply could not afford the legal cases that would be sure to follow
You could just say what the previous discussions achieved?
OK I’ll bite once more.
More discussions. As I said one of many steps. You can take the lazy route of missing the point if you want but changing the game to protect clubs and supporters is going to be a long journey.
I know that you’re reply is only going to leave me with one response so I’ll get it out of the way now and save myself the bother later.
NICK IS NEVER WRONG!
The deal being......... and then give the new owners the "already agreed" deal.
I don't think anybody doesn't grasp they don't give a shite about CCFC.
Marcus Jones, Nuneaton
“All parties must realise that 135 years of history and the future of this famous club is at stake. As is what it means to the community in the city of Coventry, the economy of the city and the surrounding area.”
Sisu need to “acquire a social conscience”
Coleen Fletcher, Coventry NE
“Who should be allowed to own a football club? How can responsible and transparent club ownership be ensured?
“And when should the footballing authorities intervene in poorly-run or failing clubs?”
Looking at this they aren't fan owned but it limits how of a club can be owned by a single person or entityOut of interest does any one know when/how all German clubs became fan owned? Or has it always been like that
Out of interest did any of those who spoke yesterday about things like importance to the community and social conscience make any comment objecting to Wasps moving here or the Ricoh being sold to them? Can't remember any local MPs speaking out about it.
Out of interest did any of those who spoke yesterday about things like importance to the community and social conscience make any comment objecting to Wasps moving here or the Ricoh being sold to them? Can't remember any local MPs speaking out about it.
Ironically, the bloke presenting the news also said "what will this actually achieve" and the other woman said "it gets people talking about it" and didn't really say what it would achieve.
Nick turns his back on communication, now that IS ironic.
Man stands on his soap box and declares ‘debate achieves nothing’ to gales of laughter
The only thing it can achieve is to keep people talking about it and to make sure the CCFC case is not forgotten. Which was really the purpose.
From what I was told it was suggested that if the mediation was not successful then all parties could well be hauled before the Digital, Culture, Media, & Sport Committee to explain themselves.
Thing is does Seppala, or Wasps for that matter, have to pay much attention to it..... probably not
In all honesty despite the public utterances I don't think anyone believes it achieves anything other than not letting CCFC be forgotten
Geoffrey Robinson was not there. The only Coventry MP not to be. Several from surrounding areas were there also
The only thing it can achieve is to keep people talking about it and to make sure the CCFC case is not forgotten. Which was really the purpose. It succeeded in that. Will it achieve a solution no, but keeping quiet wont either
From what I was told it was suggested that if the mediation was not successful then all parties could well be hauled before the Digital, Culture, Media, & Sport Committee to explain themselves.
Thing is does Seppala, or Wasps for that matter, have to pay much attention to it..... probably not
In all honesty despite the public utterances I don't think anyone believes it achieves anything other than not letting CCFC be forgotten
Geoffrey Robinson was not there. The only Coventry MP not to be. Several from surrounding areas were there also
I believe that the committee can require the attendance of named persons.Excellent, but if it happens I bet Joy will send Fisher when she should be the one being grilled.
I believe that the committee can require the attendance of named persons.
Nick finds someone who agrees with him. Aptly it’s two people who probably know nothing about the history of our situation but he’s found them.Caught a bit of it on ITV News last night, who was it that said they couldn't really help as it was a private matter between CCFC and Wasps?
Ironically, the bloke presenting the news also said "what will this actually achieve" and the other woman said "it gets people talking about it" and didn't really say what it would achieve.
Nick finds someone who agrees with him. Aptly it’s two people who probably know nothing about the history of our situation but he’s found them.
The only thing it can achieve is to keep people talking about it and to make sure the CCFC case is not forgotten. Which was really the purpose. It succeeded in that. Will it achieve a solution no, but keeping quiet wont either
From what I was told it was suggested that if the mediation was not successful then all parties could well be hauled before the Digital, Culture, Media, & Sport Committee to explain themselves.
Thing is does Seppala, or Wasps for that matter, have to pay much attention to it..... probably not
In all honesty despite the public utterances I don't think anyone believes it achieves anything other than not letting CCFC be forgotten
Geoffrey Robinson was not there. The only Coventry MP not to be. Several from surrounding areas were there also
One was the minister I think (I only caught a bit of it to see who she was) who said it was pretty much a private matter, the other was the news bloke asking the person reporting on it what it would achieve.
What does knowing the history mean? Does it mean if somebody asks knowing the history it would achieve something different to if they didn't know?
NICK IS NEVER WRONG!
The majority of people see it as a positive move. Particularly the Coventry rate payer.
I replied. You chose to ignore it. I explained how this is one step of many. You can if you choose to pay attention to how it’s evolved in Westminster and see a progression. It’s gone from one or two MP’s raising it in parliament to early day motions to being discussed in Parliament to who knows where. Maybe just maybe all parties will be asked to Parliament to explain themselves as has happened to Sports Direct, BHS and more recently Carillon personnel, surely (although probably not) even you would welcome that? Joy having a grilling and being asked some meaningful questions, Anne Lucas having a grilling and being asked some meaningful questions.Maybe you could just reply to the post rather than doing your best SBK impression?
To be fair no one put the windows in at the council house as you claimed would have happened if it had happened in Leeds. So using your own yard stick you would think that you should be agreeing with Italia not disagreeing. Mind you, you are the king of duplicity so it’s hardly surprising that you’re being dismissive even though in a roundabout sort of a way you’ve already made the same point yourself.Well that’s just made up bollocks isn’t it.
Well that’s just made up bollocks isn’t it.
If you got out more you would know.Well that’s just made up bollocks isn’t it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?