HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
I’d be happy with that - probably get both for 5/6m SISU pocket 24m that’s a little reasonableCould the rumours be true, Hamer and O'Hare to go and replaced by Bird and Sibley
I’d be happy with that - probably get both for 5/6m SISU pocket 24m that’s a little reasonableCould the rumours be true, Hamer and O'Hare to go and replaced by Bird and Sibley
Thought that EFL loan was interest free
If we sell for a huge sum of over 10 mill atleast that will shut up people on here that think our top players are worth fuck all .. honestly the amount some people put our own players down is astonishing , they will watch shite players sell for more then say " ours aren't worth that "
Bore off
I think it is. But it has to be repaid by 2024 if I remember correctly.
How much did we borrow ?I think it is. But it has to be repaid by 2024 if I remember correctly.
How much did we borrow ?
Think it was in the accounts as £2.4mHow much did we borrow ?
Is this the same loan Hull have paid off or a completely different one?
Club Statement: EFL Loan Repayment
I think it was to enable them to sign players so perhaps a different loanIs this the same loan Hull have paid off or a completely different one?
Club Statement: EFL Loan Repayment
Nah in the statement it says they were restricted on signing players, essentially an embargo, confusing as @KenilworthSkyBlue saidI think it was to enable them to sign players so perhaps a different loan
If we could get Bird & Sibley for 6 million and sold Hamer & O'Hare for a total of 18-20 million, then it could be good business, but you are taking the heartbeat out of our team in Hamer & O'Hare, and relying on Bird & Sibley to be as good. Both are young players. If Sibley takes a while to get going, we are relying on Palmer who has not played for awhile.I’d be happy with that - probably get both for 5/6m SISU pocket 24m that’s a little reasonable
If we sell for a huge sum of over 10 mill atleast that will shut up people on here that think our top players are worth fuck all .. honestly the amount some people put our own players down is astonishing , they will watch shite players sell for more then say " ours aren't worth that "
Bore off
Get what you’re saying about the heart beat - but Sibley has played 67 games in the championship and Bird over 100. I think they’d more than make up for it.If we could get Bird & Sibley for 6 million and sold Hamer & O'Hare for a total of 18-20 million, then it could be good business, but you are taking the heartbeat out of our team in Hamer & O'Hare, and relying on Bird & Sibley to be as good. Both are young players. If Sibley takes a while to get going, we are relying on Palmer who has not played for awhile.
Would prefer we kept O'Hare. Sold Hamer for 10-12 million and signed Bird for 2-3 million.
Get what you’re saying about the heart beat - but Sibley has played 67 games in the championship and Bird over 100. I think they’d more than make up for it.
losing any of them is going to be a kick in the balls but it’s not like we’re replacing them with unproven players
They were relegated due to a 21 point deduction, they’d have finished 15th without it.We are replacing them with two players who have just been relegated, I would much rather go after rudoni and maybe another European Hamer replacement.
In fairness they were relegated because of a points deduction, would have comfortably stayed up without it.We are replacing them with two players who have just been relegated, I would much rather go after rudoni and maybe another European Hamer replacement.
In fairness they were relegated because of a points deduction, would have comfortably stayed up without it.
That is a fair point, I just don’t like the idea of losing the spine of our team and just taking the spine of another team. Who in all fairness didn’t set the league on fire.
I do trust robins and the staff to make the right decisions but it would be underwhelming for me.
I’m trying not to get too excited but I think these latest rumours could actually have legs. 15m for O’Hare we would have robbed Burnley blind.
Make him someone else’s problem.
Without the crap they had to suffer last season Derby would have challenged the top slots last season imo I thought they were one of the better teams we played at the CBS.In fairness they were relegated because of a points deduction, would have comfortably stayed up without it.
Without the crap they had to suffer last season Derby would have challenged the top slots last season imo I thought they were one of the better teams we played at the CBS.
I don't really get this logic. If the club need a sale then that in itself probably indicates he doesn't have the final say, certainly not in this scenario anyway.
Only
- The word “probably” features very prominently in that article - I have no idea whether they “have to” pay that back soon or whether they are able to re-finance it - do you? £50m in cash plus a £20m debtor - I would have thought we would like to be in that position regardless of what debt we have.
As for COH we signed him on a free and if we make £x millions on him so be it. There were many times few seasons when he frustrated the hell out of me and those around me and I would imagine ME and AV felt the same.
it wasn’t that long ago that I had real concerns about whether would have a team to support at all. I know things aren’t perfect but I trust MR more than I have done any other manager for a very long time.
What planet do you live on? Burnley literally just sold someone for 20m.
It’s pretty inevitable we’ll lose one of the three.
As long as we get a decent fee then I have no issue with it.
Obviously no one wants to lose their best players but Robins has clearly worked incredibly well on a shoestring and could do some real damage with some money to spend.
Hamer was £1.5m, Gyokeres £1m and Sheaf £750k. All great players signed for relatively little.
If we sell O’Hare what’s to say we can’t go and spend the money on three players like the above?
Er we wont be spending any of the money on fees that’s why
From what I infer from believer posts, the outgoing wage of the player is what Robins will get, which well…isn’t much really
It's fairly safe to say we wouldn't be able to replace the same style, it's if we could get the effectiveness.I think we'd need a replacement , cal offers something that not many clubs have , and that's the ability to press for 90/100/120 minutes if required across the front line and midfield .. add the technical ability it's a big loss if he goes
From what I infer from believer posts, the outgoing wage of the player is what Robins will get, which well…isn’t much really