Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
And to balance that, increased costs of travel/accommodation etc. A relative drop in the ocean but looking at a 20-30% increase vs last season.
Add in increased sponsorship revenue, F&B, parking (assuming we receive percentages of both) and increased merchandise sales.
Add in increased sponsorship revenue, F&B, parking (assuming we receive percentages of both) and increased merchandise sales.
@KenilworthSkyBlue listed another 5 from the clubs website as part of “commercial”, have some of these moved on then do you know?
You can add them but also add increased costs other than sponsorship and its probable the TV revenue will reduce as less live games will take place
Why less live games?
We had a high proportion of home games last season - if you are budgeting you would not budget for the same again
How much do we get for an away game being shown in comparison?
£10k.
You can add them but also add increased costs other than sponsorship and its probable the TV revenue will reduce as less live games will take place
Nah he won't be. They already said whoever plays tonight will be those who didn't play sat.Do we expect him to be in the team for tonight @Skybluebeliever @better days ?
There’s some very long posts there, are there some ones we should be looking at specifically to get an idea?
If we look at the last available accounts which was the COVID season:
Turnover (with no fans) - £11.8 m
If we have the same number of games on Sky I cannot see that changing much. We have 13,500 Season Tickets lets assume at £220 each is near enough £3m
Lets say we have another 6,500 to average 20,000 a game at £20 each so thats 20 * 6500 * 23 = £ 3 million
So next years turnover is £18 million
Wages in the last published accounts were £13 million (a huge YOY hike down to promotion bonuses mainly). That does not include players signed May on or those released but clearly Waghorn, Bidwell, Moore etc will have cost more in wages than the outgoing Biamous - we also had the enhanced terms for Hamer and O Hare and we have signed the guy from Bristol whose on £10k a week there.
Its a conservative assumption to assume that wages at lease all income - at least.
We had player sales positive at £1.8m in the first season back in the Championship
Other costs if we carry those over are I assume £15.7 m less wages so around £2.7m
You add those to the positive sales of players in the COVID season and even with I believe generous assumptions in the clubs favour we are looking at in one season with 20,000 fans a projected loss of £4.5m
Last seasons losses I am sure will be worse along with with the recorded losses in the last published accounts
So perhaps someone can explain to me where the shortfall is coming from without a major asset being sold and only his wages being re-deployed?
No , the same as the majority of the side that played on Saturday will not featureDo we expect him to be in the team for tonight @Skybluebeliever @better days ?
Add in increased sponsorship revenue, F&B, parking (assuming we receive percentages of both) and increased merchandise sales.
No , the same as the majority of the side that played on Saturday will not feature
Moore,Kane ,Fadz,Sheaf,Palmer,Waghorn,Walker and perhaps Doyle should all feature I would imagine
It was a bit like Wilder moaning (probably about Vik) saying he was being quoted silly prices… yes mate… that’s because we don’t want to sell, and if we have to it’ll be extortionate.Our player, our price. Don’t like it? Fuck right off then
Merchandising only generates a net 10%
Are we in the Coffee Cup cup or what ever its called ? Home games we lose approx £10K
Have you allowed for VAT is ticket sales? If not then deduct 1/6th
If we look at the last available accounts which was the COVID season:
Turnover (with no fans) - £11.8 m
If we have the same number of games on Sky I cannot see that changing much. We have 13,500 Season Tickets lets assume at £220 each is near enough £3m
Lets say we have another 6,500 to average 20,000 a game at £20 each so thats 20 * 6500 * 23 = £ 3 million
So next years turnover is £18 million
Wages in the last published accounts were £13 million (a huge YOY hike down to promotion bonuses mainly). That does not include players signed May on or those released but clearly Waghorn, Bidwell, Moore etc will have cost more in wages than the outgoing Biamous - we also had the enhanced terms for Hamer and O Hare and we have signed the guy from Bristol whose on £10k a week there.
Its a conservative assumption to assume that wages at lease all income - at least.
We had player sales positive at £1.8m in the first season back in the Championship
Other costs if we carry those over are I assume £15.7 m less wages so around £2.7m
You add those to the positive sales of players in the COVID season and even with I believe generous assumptions in the clubs favour we are looking at in one season with 20,000 fans a projected loss of £4.5m
Last seasons losses I am sure will be worse along with with the recorded losses in the last published accounts
So perhaps someone can explain to me where the shortfall is coming from without a major asset being sold and only his wages being re-deployed?
Hopefully Callum will be in the squad tonight at Walsall, just wondered if he’s thought….
Burnley nah….
Yes most of us would probably go wage wise but if he’s happy here lives close to family, great mates at the club.
Maybe quality of life close to home he’s happy with that!!
Absolutely correct, something needs to plug that shortfall. However if we stop investing in playing staff that will only get worse.
I think we'll spend some of the O'Hare money, I just don't think we'll invest at a rate that will give us success.
Not sure he'll be in the squad but wouldn't read anything into it. We'll be playing the squad that were not involved at the weekend.
I'm not sure why fans think that's set some kind of precedent and any notion that the club needs a sale to operate is some kind of bizarre conspiracy theory.
Ouch, I knew it wasn't a lot but thought it was a higher percentage than that.
Do you know if EFL clubs get a payment essentially as a part of a partnership or is that only applicable for PL clubs? So basically pay us for the right to produce and sell merchandise with our brand.
But who is saying that? I've not seen that at all? Granted, I'm not on here as much as most.
Are they not in reply to people saying so and so said it or that X amount will be invested?Sift through this thread and you'll come across a fair few jibes in response to posters commenting on the club needing to sell or questioning how much Robins would receive from a sale this summer.
Sift through this thread and you'll come across a fair few jibes in response to posters commenting on the club needing to sell or questioning how much Robins would receive from a sale this summer.
That is because the ''ITK's'' told this forum that any incoming transfer fees could only be used on wages rather than outgoing fees.
Hopefully Callum will be in the squad tonight at Walsall, just wondered if he’s thought….
Burnley nah….
Yes most of us would probably go wage wise but if he’s happy here lives close to family, great mates at the club.
Maybe quality of life close to home he’s happy with that!!
Here’s hoping for a trouble free game for Moore…
Why?Here’s hoping for a trouble free game for Moore…
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?