Great game today then ?I'm defending the club not sisu.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Okay so I have taken out football operations and things like bar manager, chef etc. so trying to compare like for like with back office staff between CCFC and Walsall:
CCFC staff
FINANCE
Finance Controller: Alex Gault
Financial Administrator: Lorraine Sliwowski
Financial Administrator: Gillian Coulson
CLUB SHOP/TICKET OFFICE
Ticketing Assistant: Shelagh Brock
COMMERCIAL
Commercial Director: Adam Brearley - Leaving soon, unsure if being replaced......
Corporate Sales Manager: Tynan Scope
Commercial Administrator: Suzette Johnson
Head of Communications: Laura Hunter
Publications Editor/Graphic Designer: Mark Stokes
Media Executive: Billie Marshall
Head of Marketing: Mark Hornby
CCFC total 11 (soon to be 10)
Walsall
accounts: Michelle Draisey, Liz Withey
Wages Administrator: Debbie Saunders
Receptionist: Diane Williams
Business Development Manager: Dianne Elsworth
Commercial Manager: Wayne Thomas
Conference & Events Department: Vicki Chambers (Conference & Events Manager), Sharna Patel -
Ticket Office Manager: Gemma Park
Supporter Liaison Officer: Daniel Mole
Media Officer: Dale Moon
Programme Editor & Club Journalist: Daniel Briggs
Marketing Officer: Daniel Clarke
Official Photographer: David Linney
Additional Photography: Kevin Grice
Walsall total 15
33% more staff than us, whilst we are a bigger club on the basis of having a 40% higher average gate.
I'm defending the club not sisu.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Are you for real?Great game today then ?
The club is what Sisu want it to be.
With no interest in the club and running 'breakeven' means we are in a downward spiral.
running breakeven doesn't automatically mean we are in a downward spiral. We are top half of ;league one budget, today spanked by a league 2 club.
Surely we should be running break even ?. Its more about employing the right people, in the right positions and trying to compete. That's the bit we are lacking
2 of those are conferencing and events which we don't have because we don't run a stadium, and 2 of them are photographers.
Attendance means nothing, you don't need an additional accountant because you have more fans. Let's tall finance, walsalls last account they had a turnover of £6.7m, our last set of accounts showed us to have a turnover of just £4.7m. Perhaps with a turnover 40% higher than ours mean they need 33% more background staff...
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
running breakeven doesn't automatically mean we are in a downward spiral. We are top half of ;league one budget, today spanked by a league 2 club.
Surely we should be running break even ?. Its more about employing the right people, in the right positions and trying to compete. That's the bit we are lacking
Whats the point of owning a club if you don't want to put some money in it ?running breakeven doesn't automatically mean we are in a downward spiral. We are top half of ;league one budget, today spanked by a league 2 club.
Surely we should be running break even ?. Its more about employing the right people, in the right positions and trying to compete. That's the bit we are lacking
Not gonna happen is it when people have families to feed and lives to live.From what you've said sounds like it'd be best for all the staff to all quit
Whilst you are right in principle, do many teams that are operating on a break even basis get promoted- and stay up more than 2 or 3 years? ( serious question as I don't know ).
We were given Yeovil as an example by Tim a couple of years ago. They got up with a budget of 2 million. All gone quiet over there now. Where is Yeovil in the league now?
Why do you give them oxygen ?
They don't even try to justify what they are doing to the club yet fans on here try and defend the indefensible.
And now he has got the facts what?OR he is trying to establish facts?
We are a bigger club then Bournemouth, Burton and Swansea as well.where are Bournemouth, Burton, Swansea et al
No offence to them, but we are a bigger club than Yeovil
Which of our best players have Swansea and Burton had on the cheap? I honestly can't remember selling a player to either club?We are a bigger club then Bournemouth, Burton and Swansea as well.
Funny but they have all had some of our best players on the cheap.
So - do we think MV will step down/back up to the boardroom and vacate the manager's post? perhaps TF will run the team (for free) until January, or should that say 'ruin it for free' !
From what I see the club haven't even looked for a new manager. Has there even been any interviews etc?
Who makes up the coaching staf for the first team? Venus and Oggy? Micky Mouse.
We are a bigger club then Bournemouth, Burton and Swansea as well.
Funny but they have all had some of our best players on the cheap.
where are Bournemouth, Burton, Swansea et al
No offence to them, but we are a bigger club than Yeovil
Wonderful how you always quote figures from other teams when you want to deflect attention from SISU.Bournmouth paid one loan player £30k a week in the championship as an emergency loan signing. Yeah we are bigger than them,
You mean like you did two days ago, saying you didn't mind SISU staying as long as they signed a long term deal at the Ricoh.
Hypocrite.
Mine didn't turn up (well not mine but you know what I mean) and I contacted jsb@ccfc.co.uk and they sorted it out for me. Hope it helps!Oh and the club have still not sent my daughter her JSB welcome pack , and the bloke next to me at the Ricoh hasn't got his yet either for his kid , it's only December , it will still come right ??lol shambles
I would bet that the infrastructure at Forest Green, Tranmere and Wrexham is all on a more professional level than ours which is sort of the point he was making. Do you disagree with the central point of his post?Can you give us a list of the non league teams who have bigger staffing size and cost, than us?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
What about actually trying to increase turnover so that the break even figure is higher. How about starting that that process by not alienating the fan base, by actual genuine engagement with them rather than continual lies and misinformation. The problem with Sisu's model is that the break even figure will decrease season on season due to their incompetence and mismanagement.running breakeven doesn't automatically mean we are in a downward spiral. We are top half of ;league one budget, today spanked by a league 2 club.
Surely we should be running break even ?. Its more about employing the right people, in the right positions and trying to compete. That's the bit we are lacking
Our staffing
http://www.ccfc.co.uk/club/boardroom/index.aspx
Doesn't look any smaller than walsalls
http://www.saddlers.co.uk/club/whos_who/
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
My question was whether clubs with a break even structure- without equity injection- got promotions. Yeovil was an example. Bournemouth and Swansea probably not.
Spot onWe are a bigger club than them. They have owners willing to put money in so they spiral up whereas we have owners who aren't so we're spiralling down. That's the difference.
Never even thought of Sisu when I said that. It was all about what was best for the clubs survival.
More chance of someone taking over once we are settled with a long term deal.
Never said I didn't mind Sisu. Again you have missed my point.
There is another option (preferred) and that relies on Sisu coming to the party and doing a long term deal with Wasps for the benefit of both parties.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?