Platt and communication problems (1 Viewer)

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
OK playing out wide may not be his (McDonalds) game, but I still expect a player to be able to close down and show a little bit of workrate. Yes he was meant to be doing some defending when asked to fill in that role, but he was about as effective as a traffic cone. He just couldn't be bothered most the time, was strolling about, and had his hands on his hips a la Eastwood.
 

Last edited:

guicey15

New Member
I think Platt is my new favorite player :laugh: Talked complete sense throughout that interview. And looks to be a good player this year (never thought i'd hear myself saying that)
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
My thoughts on Cody are that he is a fox in the box type of player and he contributes very little to our all round play. Like otis says the highlights of his goals shows he cones alive in the 6 yard box but we don't get enough crosses into the box.

He is a luxury player - We're literally carrying him for 95% of the game the ball isn't in the oppositions box, which makes it hard when you under the cosh. I actually thought this of him every game i've seen him play. What makes it worse is that at least 2 other of our players are also passengers and it impossible to play well when your carrying so many players.

I think I'm coming around to the platt and juke partnership, at least you know the ball will be held up if we knock it forward.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
My thoughts on Cody are that he is a fox in the box type of player and he contributes very little to our all round play. Like otis says the highlights of his goals shows he cones alive in the 6 yard box but we don't get enough crosses into the box.

He is a luxury player - We're literally carrying him for 95% of the game the ball isn't in the oppositions box, which makes it hard when you under the cosh. I actually thought this of him every game i've seen him play. What makes it worse is that at least 2 other of our players are also passengers and it impossible to play well when your carrying so many players.


I think I'm coming around to the platt and juke partnership, at least you know the ball will be held up if we knock it forward.



Well said that man.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Really like what Platt has to say. Platt/Carsley dream team if Thorn goes anyone?
 

Disorganised1

New Member
He may not have the greatest skills but he obviously has listened when people were talking to him.
;)
 

Bertola

Well-Known Member
The slagging off of McDonald is a bit mysterious to me.

Yes him and Juke were far apart, but Juke said that was mainly tactics, as they believed they could get success down the sides of the Southampton Centre backs.

And when he was moved out onto the left, there were several times he chased back and covered Christie if he had gone forward
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
I didn't think McDonald was poor. Just anonymous.

Did Juke really say that about the tactics? If so, that's exactly what I've been bleedin banging on about these past few days!!!! :facepalm::D
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
McDonald doesn't suit our current style of play, players like Mcdonald need fast ball in behind to exploit open space on the counter attack. We allow the opposition time to get bodies behind the ball so there is very little space for any of our players.
 

Sky Blue Sheepy

New Member
McDonald doesn't suit our current style of play, players like Mcdonald need fast ball in behind to exploit open space on the counter attack. We allow the opposition time to get bodies behind the ball so there is very little space for any of our players.

It's odd really because that's what our formation craves. Get the ball to the ACM who can dink in a ball over the top for Cody to run onto. For me, this would be a perfect role for Clingan - at the tip of the diamond. A player with his passing range can either play that ball over the top for Cody to latch onto, or have a pop himself - he's shown himself capable of doing so. Deegan and Thomas can then hold the defence.
 
Last edited:

Otis

Well-Known Member
It's odd really because that's what our formation craves. Get the ball to the ACM who can dink in a ball over the top for Cody to run Cody. For me, this would be a perfect role for Clingan - at the tip of the diamond. A player with his passing range can either play that ball over the top for Cody to latch onto, or have a pop himself - he's shown himself capable of doing so. Deegan and Thomas can then hold the defence.

Find it baffling too that we don't do this. McDonald is quick. Clingan can play accurate pinpoint passes. Doesn't add up.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
The problem is clingan naturally drops deep, even when he played in a 442 he dropped deep. That is his comfort zone
 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member
McDonald doesn't suit our current style of play, players like Mcdonald need fast ball in behind to exploit open space on the counter attack. We allow the opposition time to get bodies behind the ball so there is very little space for any of our players.

So what you're saying is..he's one-dimensional?

My criticism isn't about anything other than his utter lack of application and effort. I watched him like a hawk Saturday, and as I kept saying, he was wandering around with his hands on his hips at walking pace-whilst Juke, for one, was sprinting to close down space.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
So what you're saying is..he's one-dimensional?

My criticism isn't about anything other than his utter lack of application and effort. I watched him like a hawk Saturday, and as I kept saying, he was wandering around with his hands on his hips at walking pace-whilst Juke, for one, was sprinting to close down space.
What I am saying is this is how I believe we would get the best out of him and we should be trying to play to our players strengths not mould them into something they are not.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
He's probably standing around with his hands on his hips because he is totally pissed off with the lack of service he's getting.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top