Andy Turners ratings are interesting.
Nazon 7.5 “he worked his socks off”
It is a player ratings thread though.Because as a team we played narrower and less open in the second half which helped the defenders. People look at individual performances when they should be looking at the shape of the team.
I found his ratings strange, think he meant pulled his socks up!! For 15 minutes
Ha!!!Andy Turners ratings are interesting.
Nazon 7.5 “he worked his socks off”
we lost the ball just outside the Cheltenam box and Nazon sprinted 40 yards to try and win the ball back, he didn't get it first attempt but he chased the lay off and won the ball. Not bad for a bloke fiddling with his socks!!
He came on and ran around like a demented gazelle for the first five minutes, but then he soon showed a lack of interest for the most part.I do recall that actually so that's two things he did while fiddling with his socks for 15 minutes while looking uninterested and moaning at the ref rather than putting a shift in helping his team mates out.
He came on and ran around like a demented gazelle for the first five minutes, but then he soon showed a lack of interest for the most part.
McDonald 7 strong and sold read the game well and good distribution
Andy Turners ratings are interesting.
Nazon 7.5 “he worked his socks off”
McDonald struggled, as did Willis that first half.McDonald 7 strong and sold read the game well and good distribution
It is a player ratings thread though.It's where you rate players individually.
I look to see if defenders are marking who they should be marking and whether they are clearing the ball, making tackles and distributing it out of defence.
Willis and Rod struggled in that first half.
Second half we also played the ball a bit earlier, a bit longer and this pushed Cheltenham back and. They weren't half as threatening as a result.
Well, yes, that is obviously taken into account too. If Grimmer doesn't contribute going forwards because he has been told to stay back you can't then mark him down for not going forwards.But it depends if the focus is just on the player, or their performance within the context of the way the team are set up. The two should go hand in hand surely.
It may not change things drastically but can to a point I.e someone might not get forward because they have a specific defensive role. Defenders may look better, not because they are but because the defensive formation has been tightened. It is too easy to say a player was poor because his team mates just left him exposed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?