And that's enough for you? Compare the two.An article full of hot air. Try better next time.
"So, are the policies similar as Trump claimed? In the most superficial of ways, yes."
And that's enough for you? Compare the two.
In 2011, under Obama's term, the state department responded to a clear and specific threat by implementing a temporary, 6 month, threat. A similar thing happened after 9/11.
Trumps ban is not to stop any specific threat. In fact no refugee or immigrant from the countries on Trumps list have ever been involved in a fatal terrorist attack in the US.
Obama paused refugee processing.
Trump is stopping entry for all non US citizens from the countries on his list.
Its not even remotely close to being the same thing, as the piece states the only similarity is in the most superficial of ways.
No it isn't. One was a temporary halt to processing refugees due to a specific credible threat. It didn't even stop entry, refugees were still admitted during that time.It's semantics and you know it is.
No it isn't. One was a temporary halt to processing refugees due to a specific credible threat. It didn't even stop entry, refugees were still admitted during that time.
Trump's is a ban on all people travelling from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, North Korea, Venezuela and Yemen. Why are Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt not on the list given its people from those country who have undertaken terrorist acts against the US recently? Nothing to do with those being countries Trump has business interests in I'm sure.
If you genuinely can't see the huge difference between the two situations I'm speechless.
Jerusalem is Israel's capital, Trump to say
FFS.......I wish Trump was much more like JFK or Abraham Lincoln..........
You light the blue touchpaper and that's what happens.Trump's Jerusalem move sparks clashes
Thanks for that Donald.........what a grade a c**t of a president.....
And a Merry Christmas to all.
Classic Disrupter /Creat chaos and exploit the space.
Let alone 'Look over ther',distraction,not for the first time in his term.
What an unpleaaant being he is.
You light the blue touchpaper and that's what happens.
The guy is a complete clown.
So reassuring that Trump has backed this guy, Ray Moore, embroiled in a child sex abuse scandal.
Alabama votes in high-stakes election
And this is what this Ray Moore believes.
Things Republican Roy Moore believes
I would definitely see that as extremist.
Fantastic news that he seems to have lost the race.So reassuring that Trump has backed this guy, Ray Moore, embroiled in a child sex abuse scandal.
Alabama votes in high-stakes election
And this is what this Ray Moore believes.
Things Republican Roy Moore believes
I would definitely see that as extremist.
Fantastic news that he seems to have lost the race.
Fantastic news that he seems to have lost the race.
He is a con man. Believe me... as he says. He is running a family business along white, nationalistic, heterosexual, christian lines.
The USA is bigger and better than that.
His base is around 30%, but he is president for 100% of Americans.
His approval ratings are the worst ever.
I hope he, and his cronies, get led out of office in handcuffs.
Yeah, can someone please point me in the direction of those who said Clinton was an angel.
Trump is a very, very dangerous man and a hotheaded one at that.
And his campaign says they are not accepting it because 51:49 is too small a majority. They want to contest it. So much for right wing democracy. Reminds me of „you lost, get over it“....
Trumps not dangerous. He’s just a cartoon character who makes outrageous statements for maximum effect and to detract from the fact that he is doing very little in terms of legislation
Clinton would have been far far more dangerous.
Trumps not dangerous. He’s just a cartoon character who makes outrageous statements for maximum effect and to detract from the fact that he is doing very little in terms of legislation
Clinton would have been far far more dangerous.
Of course he is dangerous. Clear as day.Sorry Grendel but Trump is clearly dangerous to both the global environment & world peace...... his statements are more often than not designed to inflame situations as a distraction technique......its a super-condensed version of the "Shock Doctrine"......
His "approach" has escalated tensions considerably in the Middle-East & Korea......
Not only that......his constant twittering has potential to cause panic & uncertainty across the globe......
The bloke is a fucking global liability & the sooner he is impeached (or charged with sexual assault etc.) the safer the world will be.
Sorry Grendel but Trump is clearly dangerous to both the global environment & world peace...... his statements are more often than not designed to inflame situations as a distraction technique......its a super-condensed version of the "Shock Doctrine"......
His "approach" has escalated tensions considerably in the Middle-East & Korea......
Not only that......his constant twittering has potential to cause panic & uncertainty across the globe......
The bloke is a fucking global liability & the sooner he is impeached (or charged with sexual assault etc.) the safer the world will be.
You lost.
Get over it.
Clinton openly prior to the election campaign indicated she would demand a no fly zone with Syria an action she openly acknowledged could result in conflict against Russia.
Trumps talk and bluster will long be forgotten when he has departed. Clinton shared him on the ego maniac stage but would have persued her anti Russia agenda with far more purpose. The consequence would have been potentially calamitous.
What’s merkels base to be chancellor of 100% of Germans?
You lost.
Get over it.
That’s it. That was what I was looking for... anyway it’s nice seeing these people being defeated especially in a red state and with Trump, Bannon, Farage etc having spoken out for Moore.
What’s FriaTaden’s and Breitbart’s take on this?
You're obsessed with Breitbart.
For the record, I asked them. They also said 'you lose'.
You do surprise me. Waiting for Captain Dart’s Link.
Can you two just have your own thread for bitching at one another.
I think Mart needs his own forum in general to be honest.
I am talking about Moore being extremist.Trump actually backed Luther Strange who lost the primary to Roy (not Ray) Moore. He only favoured Moore over Jones to keep the Republican majority at 52.48, and actually rejected Moore before the allegations-meaning just on the grounds of his views, so I would not call that extremist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?