Nick
Administrator
Don't ask me, ask Robins.
He would probably put Ponticelli on buy decide to play long ball to him with his back to goal judging by his recent decisions.
Why not do both?
Yep, totally agree.I'd play him with Biamou up front, said on Saturday at about 55 minutes to bring them both on.
Time to fire up the Luton match thread as there seems to be much to discuss....Don't ask me, ask Robins.
He would probably put Ponticelli on buy decide to play long ball to him with his back to goal judging by his recent decisions.
For me at this minute it's 0-0 and a ball drop 15 yards out to anyone of our players to have a pop it'd be Ponticelli, madness he's not getting more game time.
I like the kid but let's be honest when he came on against FGR he had a chance with a header almost immediately that he put straight at their keeper. Not blaming him in the slightest but we all know that had it been McNulty or Biamou they'd have got dogs abuse
Didn't he force a save from the keeper and the header was from the edge of the area? Or am I thinking of a different chance
No, that was the one.
It's what I have been getting at where people seem to see different things.
It was, it was no way one that should be scored every time. As usual though that gets ignored.I thought it was a good effort considering he was running away from goal and the angle of the cross.
I don't think there is much, but we need to play to his strengths.I don't think anyone expects him to score every chance but we've gone over 8 hours without a goal and he's been on the pitch for how long of that time 20 minutes?
I don't get what the 'risk/gamble' is on giving a lad full of confidence a go.
Ruining his confidence before he begins his career, and ruining his career before it begins?I don't get what the 'risk/gamble' is on giving a lad full of confidence a go.
Agreed I think if we went all out attack against Luton we would get destroyedHe needs to start but I think MR is very stubborn and would rather play defence football .If we get a point at Luton then it's ok but at home we should be all out attack imo.But I think Luton will put a few past us .
Imagine that, defend against the ten men of colchester at home but go all out against Luton away.Agreed I think if we went all out attack against Luton we would get destroyed
Yep, totally agree.
I thought Shipley for Jones was an odd one. I would have brought Vincenti on. When Beavon went off I would then have brought Biamou on and then introduced Ponticelli after.
Not very reassuring that assumption, to bring someone on just in case another player breaks down.I thought that he brought on Shipley to cover if Haynes broke down and it still gave him two changes but then again he never bothers using all three
He needs to start but I think MR is very stubborn and would rather play defence football .If we get a point at Luton then it's ok but at home we should be all out attack imo.But I think Luton will put a few past us .
Perhaps robins is saving money on appearance fees with the lack of subs
Why? We've got the best defence in the country for our leagueAgreed, reckon we will be well beaten.
A draw if Jones is out, sneak a win if he's ok. McNulty to score from a rebound from a Jones shot and City to keep Collins completely quietWhy? We've got the best defence in the country for our league
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I like the kid but let's be honest when he came on against FGR he had a chance with a header almost immediately that he put straight at their keeper. Not blaming him in the slightest but we all know that had it been McNulty or Biamou they'd have got dogs abuse
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?