interesting comment on th academy lads from their forum
"to play the kids we need to get them signed to professional contracts, and we cant afford to do it"
interesting comment on th academy lads from their forum
"to play the kids we need to get them signed to professional contracts, and we cant afford to do it"
Just out of interest where in the Football league rules does it say about if youth team player plays 3 times for senior team then is then registered as first team player? Not saying it is wrong just like to see it in black and white. Cheers
What the hell is going on. I thought if you went into admin you were in a transfer embargo, or at the very least under a one way embargo. E.G. No players in, but you were allowed players out to bring money in.
Pompey seal loan deal for Scottish midfielder.
Pompey have signed midfielder Scott Allan on a one-month loan deal from West Brom.
Michael Appleton has added to his threadbare squad by going back to his former club for the 21-year-old, subject to Football League approval.
Despite interest from both Celtic and Rangers, Scotland under-21 international Allan joined West Brom from Dundee United only last month on a two-and-a-half year deal.
Pompey were allowed to bring in another player after Erik Huseklepp joined Birmingham on loan today.
Source: http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/sport/p...l_loan_deal_for_scottish_midfielder_1_3555125
I hope the Football league stop this happening as per the Scottish PL last week.
It's getting a little ridiculous. How can they afford to bring in loans and we can't. Something wrong with that. They are in admin and we are still being punished for trying to play by the rules.
I'm guessing West Brom will be paying the wages in full whilst on loan.
Cheers MD
So looks like there might be a policy but no actual rule. It also looks more like appleton is choosing not to use youngsters rather than his hands being tied
I'm guessing West Brom will be paying the wages in full whilst on loan.
Absolutely, and I imagine this has been Appleton's policy for a month or two. Similar to SISU, Chainrai stopped putting money in a while back, so they must've have known administration was coming.
Methinks we'll see a FL (maybe PL too) rule change or two over the summer regarding admin as this situation may become more frequent next season...
Then why are we not finding these free players?
Wonder if as Pompeys "terrible" injury crisis abates will they hand back the loanees keeping their squad at 14? Yeah right - they have yet again flouted the rules and have been allowed to do it. As long as clubs continue to be bailed out they will continue to be run badly and clubs like ours that have tried to run a tight ship are being punished.
How many transfer embargos have we been placed under recently? Was that because we weren't paying clubs we owed money to?
No. It was because our accounts were in late.
How about the money which Bolton claimed we owed for Ward?
When we couldn't pay Southampton for Best?
Maybe we should have stuck 2 fingers up and hit the loan market as well then?
Chainrai handed the club over to Antonov's CSI group last summer. Antonov kept the club funded through his Lithuanian bank, the assets of which were frozen when it itself went into administration. It was this freezing of Antonov's funds that starved Pompey of cash, not so much Chainrai.
Yes, BSB you're right, I should have been clearer. Chainrai is (supposedly) owed £17m and is the secured creditor, but since CSI went into admin in Nov no-one has been funding Pompey, so they must've known admin was inevitable since then.
and we thought the ownership of Cov was murky!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?