Posh Match Thread (2 Viewers)

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
Peter Bodak - on radio. Not a lot going on between his ears (imho!) :D
 

Monners

Well-Known Member
Peter Bodak - on radio. Not a lot going on between his ears (imho!) :D

He was a bit of an over confident type when he was a player, so doesn't surprise me. However, still remember the great 25 yard sreamer v Watford in the LC QF replay in 1980, and of course the chip v Man City in the FA Cup.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Burge
Willis
Pennington
Martin
Stokes
Ward
Fleck
JOB
Samuel
Tudguy
Nouble

Bench is poor today
Charles-cook
Webster
Phillips
Finch
Barton
Thomas
Turgott


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
He was a bit of an over confident type when he was a player, so doesn't surprise me. However, still remember the great 25 yard sreamer v Watford in the LC QF replay in 1980, and of course the chip v Man City in the FA Cup.


So does he :D
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
Hasn't been given a consistent run in the side.

He isn't good enough to warrant a run in the side. Just admit it, he's nowhere near as good as you thought he would be when he signed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

Monners

Well-Known Member
Back on topic - I would have preferred to see Phillips today as well (at right back, not in midfield).
 

LJC_CCFC

Active Member
He isn't good enough to warrant a run in the side. Just admit it, he's nowhere near as good as you thought he would be when he signed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)

If Tudgay, Nouble and Madine were 'good' enough to warrant a run in the side, Jackson certainly is.
 

Nick

Administrator
He isn't good enough to warrant a run in the side. Just admit it, he's nowhere near as good as you thought he would be when he signed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
Not as good as expected I agree, but I think better then mcquoid if given a run
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
If Tudgay, Nouble and Madine were 'good' enough to warrant a run in the side, Jackson certainly is.

And yet, he hasn't been given a run, ergo, not 'good' enough. He's played enough minutes, and we can all see he's not very good.

Come on, just admit it. You nailed your colours to the mast pretty early. ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

kg82

Well-Known Member
First team sheet I saw had Odelusi on the bench. Now it's Finch. Has he picked up an injury in warm-up?
 

LJC_CCFC

Active Member
And yet, he hasn't been given a run, ergo, not 'good' enough. He's played enough minutes, and we can all see he's not very good.

Come on, just admit it. You nailed your colours to the mast pretty early. ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)

He's a finisher, simple as. He movement, run and finish against Crawley was very similar to that of Samuel's goal last Saturday. He's been getting 20 minutes at the end of games (Mainly under Pressley) out wide. Play him up front (consistently), give him chances and the goals would come.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
He's a finisher, simple as. He movement, run and finish against Crawley was very similar to that of Samuel's goal last Saturday. He's been getting 20 minutes at the end of games (Mainly under Pressley) out wide. Play him up front (consistently), give him chances and the goals would come.

That's your opinion. Pressley and mowbray would have seen plenty of him in training, and yet haven't started him or given him a run. He is rightly 4th choice.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors :)
 

LJC_CCFC

Active Member
Be an interesting afternoon for Chris Stokes, both Smith at RB and Taylor at RM are very pacy. Just a tad worried for the lad.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top