Even look at back 4, only Walker is a starter for their club. Stone, Maguire and Shaw are not currently first choices.
We overrate our team a bit. France and ourselves are very even as a team. In a combined XI, how many players would actually start? Then account for Benzema, Pogba and Kante.
We need to make strides in our striking and defence and goalkeeping departments.
It's individual things like with twenty minutes to go and you he have a beast of a free kick specialist on the bench , redundant.
Sterling has delivered for Southgate during his reign, so it's hardly surprising he went for the known quantity he trusts. Robins does that all the time too just about all the managers do. It's not *that* crazy a decision to bring Sterling on really. Not like he's a total incompetent.To be fair a another couple of yards out rashford sticks that one at the end in the top corner
I didn’t agree with putting Sterling on. Should’ve been Grealish or wild card Maddison
I feel like Kane missing the penalty is taking the forefront, but if it hadn't have been for that moment of madness by the French defender, what would have happened anyway? We didn't create enough from open play, were sloppy for their two goals, and made some silly tactical decisions later in the game.
I am feeling more frustrated by this as the days go by.
Sterling has delivered for Southgate during his reign, so it's hardly surprising he went for the known quantity he trusts. Robins does that all the time too just about all the managers do. It's not *that* crazy a decision to bring Sterling on really. Not like he's a total incompetent.
As for Rashford, is he now in the shouldn't have been playing category now he's played, moving out of the should have been playing category when he didn't?
Im not one for stats alone but England had 8 shots on target to France’s 5. Off the top of my head as well as missed pen…Maguire hit outside of the post, rashford just over from free kick, Bellingham long range shot metre either side of keeper and it’s in, Saka put one wide from six yards from Shaw cross and Kane brought down on edge of area which was ignored
Frances goal went through Bellingham’s legs, even a slight deflection and it’s saved by Pickford or hits post/goes wide). Even Giroud header hit Maguire as well, who knows where it was going without that. As I’ve said, fine margins and we just didn’t have the rub of the green
Southgate has no bottle.
Look at Holland when they were chasing the game.
Not sure I agree with that, England are ranked 4th in the world and haven't got to the final 4But I think he has been brilliant for us and I think there’s a lot of criticism that’s not deserved. He has taken us so, so far; further than people can expect.
If you look at the quality of chances, giroud had 2 headers and a volley all centre of goal about 10 yards out from open play. The only chance we created that was comparable was Saka's from Fodens cross.Im not one for stats alone but England had 8 shots on target to France’s 5. Off the top of my head as well as missed pen…Maguire hit outside of the post, rashford just over from free kick, Bellingham long range shot metre either side of keeper and it’s in, Saka put one wide from six yards from Shaw cross and Kane brought down on edge of area which was ignored
Frances goal went through Bellingham’s legs, even a slight deflection and it’s saved by Pickford or hits post/goes wide). Even Giroud header hit Maguire as well, who knows where it was going without that. As I’ve said, fine margins and we just didn’t have the rub of the green
Every site I've looked at has our xG much higher than France's. Even taking away Kane's second pen.If you look at the quality of chances, giroud had 2 headers and a volley all centre of goal about 10 yards out from open play. The only chance we created that was comparable was Saka's from Fodens cross.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
My point was that they created the better chances from open play, which they did. You take away our 2 penalties and look at xG purely for open play and set piece goals then its.Every site I've looked at has our xG much higher than France's. Even taking away Kane's second pen.
xG England 2.36-1.08 France
xG England vs France Football World Cup 2022 | Expected Goals Eng 1-2 Fra Match Stats Quarterfinal | Soccer Blog|Football News, Reviews, Quizzes
Click here for expected goals stats from France vs Argentina FWC Final 2022 Here is a look at the xG (expected goals) stats from England vs France (Football World Cup 2022 Quarterfinal Attendance 68,895 December 10, 2022). England were the better side, especially in the second half, and that is...www.soccer-blogger.com
2.54 v 1.21
England vs France xG (Expected goals) Stats, World Cup 2022, December 10, 2022 | xGscore
England vs France Advanced xG stats, xPTS, xG on target (xGOT), xG open and set play, xG per time, xG Fairness. World Cup 2022, December 10, 2022.xgscore.io
2.69 v 1.41
Today's Live Football Scores, Fixtures and Results | Sporting Life
Get today's live football scores, results, fixtures and goal scorers across all major competitions from Sporting Lifewww.infogol.net
Leaving spaces before commas? Dom Hyam’s backI've also never understood the constant comparing Southgate to every England manager before him .
We surely can only compare a manager against the level of opposition at the time and ask wether anybody could have done better .
Southgate getting to a semi or a final over the last 6 years has absolutely no bearing on what happened 20 years ago ...none whatsoever, its a weird comparison.
Spain , Germany, Brazil, Portugal, Italy, Holland are not the same teams that they used to be and England currently have a pretty damn good crop of players ..
I'm positive with the routes we had , there are lots of managers who would have taken England to exactly the same place Gareth did .. he's done nothing special and did the absolute minimum expected with what was infront of him
Leaving spaces before commas? Dom Hyam’s back
I don't think it's a comparison per se, it's more of a question of would a different coach taken us further this time. And if you think yes, does that apply to previous managers when we didn't win a tournament? eg Could someone else than Erikkson done better in the 30 mins against 10-men Brazil in 2002? Every time Capello's England played a decent team we lost and he probably had the best CV of any England manager.I've also never understood the constant comparing Southgate to every England manager before him .
We surely can only compare a manager against the level of opposition at the time and ask wether anybody could have done better .
Southgate getting to a semi or a final over the last 6 years has absolutely no bearing on what happened 20 years ago ...none whatsoever, its a weird comparison.
Spain , Germany, Brazil, Portugal, Italy, Holland are not the same teams that they used to be and England currently have a pretty damn good crop of players ..
I'm positive with the routes we had , there are lots of managers who would have taken England to exactly the same place Gareth did .. he's done nothing special and did the absolute minimum expected with what was infront of him
It's so different from club management, so it's also very much about the players an international manager inherits. He can't buy players.I've also never understood the constant comparing Southgate to every England manager before him .
We surely can only compare a manager against the level of opposition at the time and ask wether anybody could have done better .
And yes, we all would have expected quarter finals, minimum. That's exactly what we got.I've also never understood the constant comparing Southgate to every England manager before him .
We surely can only compare a manager against the level of opposition at the time and ask wether anybody could have done better .
Southgate getting to a semi or a final over the last 6 years has absolutely no bearing on what happened 20 years ago ...none whatsoever, its a weird comparison.
Spain , Germany, Brazil, Portugal, Italy, Holland are not the same teams that they used to be and England currently have a pretty damn good crop of players ..
I'm positive with the routes we had , there are lots of managers who would have taken England to exactly the same place Gareth did .. he's done nothing special and did the absolute minimum expected with what was infront of him
Yup and I'm always guilty of looking ahead and thinking 'in two years time player x and y will be at their peak, we'll win it then!'It's so different from club management, so it's also very much about the players an international manager inherits. He can't buy players.
Southgate was blessed with a lot of talent in front of him this time around.
He was lucky that he inherited the likes of Foden and Saka and Bellingham.
I think Reece James would have done really well in the tournament too.
He does have some very good players at his disposal. So it is hard to compare to others, because a lot can come down to the luck of what players you can pick from. And England seemed to be well adrift for years, but over the past few years have invested in youth and brought players through the system.
Yup. Exactly that I think. We COULD have won this tournament for sure. I think there is little doubt about it.Yup and I'm always guilty of looking ahead and thinking 'in two years time player x and y will be at their peak, we'll win it then!'
It can't always be down to bad luck/refs/lack of subs each time. How do we differ from Germany/Italy for example?
We seem much closer now in ability/fitness/coaching/tactics, so what's left? Is it mentality/bottle?
Or maybe he is unable to sign his resignation letter until it's time to take his Pizza Hut paper bag off his head.The fact Gareth hasn't yet resigned suggests he will stay on
I see a lot of talk on here about how international football is somehow worse today than it was 10/20 years ago, but I’m not sure how people are measuring that? I assume it’s more than just vague notions of ‘It was better in my day’.I've also never understood the constant comparing Southgate to every England manager before him .
We surely can only compare a manager against the level of opposition at the time and ask wether anybody could have done better .
Southgate getting to a semi or a final over the last 6 years has absolutely no bearing on what happened 20 years ago ...none whatsoever, its a weird comparison.
Spain , Germany, Brazil, Portugal, Italy, Holland are not the same teams that they used to be and England currently have a pretty damn good crop of players ..
I'm positive with the routes we had , there are lots of managers who would have taken England to exactly the same place Gareth did .. he's done nothing special and did the absolute minimum expected with what was infront of him
Thing is though, the German team of late, just aren't the same powerhouse team they have been in the past. They are definitely weaker.I see a lot of talk on here about how international football is somehow worse today than it was 10/20 years ago, but I’m not sure how people are measuring that? I assume it’s more than just vague notions of ‘It was better in my day’.
All that being said, the thing that Southgate is accused of being unable to do - beat big teams in the knockout stages - is something that has affected every England manager since 1966. And he arguably has a better record there than his predecessors anyway……many of them failed to beat Germany - even at home! - as he did, for example. I’m not convinced that any team with Ashley Young at LWB and Delle Alli at #10 has a divine right to beat Colombia either, but Southgate managed it.
Ultimately we were right to get rid of people like Sven (who couldn’t beat Portugal), Capello (who couldn’t beat Germany) and Hodgson (who couldn’t beat anyone), and I can see the argument for making the same change here, in the interests of freshening things up. The difference here is that a) There’s visible progress under Southgate that was never obvious under his predecessors and b) There are no obvious half-decent replacements waiting in the wings. While things aren’t going flawlessly under Southgate, they’re still going pretty well, and there’s something to be said for not ripping that up when the same core group of players are going to be one of the favourites for the next big tournament in not even 18 months.
Fair point, but that’s not really what I want to get hung up on. Besides, England pulling away from recent world champions in terms of quality is something I’d like to see continue!Thing is though, the German team of late, just aren't the same powerhouse team they have been in the past. They are definitely weaker.
Thing is though, the German team of late, just aren't the same powerhouse team they have been in the past. They are definitely weaker.
A few are , most I mentionedThing is though, the German team of late, just aren't the same powerhouse team they have been in the past. They are definitely weaker.
It doesn’t help that whenever Southgate has done well, it always comes with an asterisk.
France were favourites going into the tie, clearly the money men and most people believed France would win. They did, big shock. It is commendable that we actually looked the better team and really should’ve took the game to extra time. Usually with England, it’s a case of getting outclassed by an elite team. The consensus that the winner of England v France would be the overall winner, especially after Brazil crashed out and we got edged.
It’s a shame, I think Southgate will probably leave when his contract is up. Considering his record, which is the best we’ve ever had, he gets far too much unwarranted stick.
As Al Murray put it, every England fan knows how to win a World Cup after a few pints.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?