SlowerThanPlatt
Well-Known Member
Ideas in here...
I agree with that; perhaps it is a case of the opposition susing out the way TM's teams play. BTW how many is a "fanny"?Look Maddison has only played a fanny full of games ffs, he is a talent but not yet a talisman.
Look Maddison has only played a fanny full of games ffs, he is a talent but not yet a talisman.
Quiet possibly but I'm sure TM will develop alternative team patterns, we now have striker options with Fortune and Tudgay, Armstrong and Kent along with Murphy I'm still fairly optimisticI agree with that; perhaps it is a case of the opposition susing out the way TM's teams play. BTW how many is a "fanny"?
Agreed. A bit worrying that we're relying on an inexperienced 18 yr old, despite his potential...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I agree with that; perhaps it is a case of the opposition susing out the way TM's teams play. BTW how many is a "fanny"?
Oh Otis, you really are a cad.Depends. If it's Katie Price I would say a fair few.
FFS it's one game
I know it's only a small cohort of games but we have only picked up 4 points from the last 4 league games without Maddison, so technically it's not only one game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Look Maddison has only played a fanny full of games ffs, he is a talent but not yet a talisman.
May be just a coincidence too, but we have found it much harder to play the same free flowing football as we were when he was in the team.
Look Maddison has only played a fanny full of games ffs, he is a talent but not yet a talisman.
I know it's only a small cohort of games but we have only picked up 4 points from the last 4 league games without Maddison, so technically it's not only one game.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Armstrong's also less effective because Maddison is the only one on his wavelength. I remember him saying it when he joined that there's already a connection with the two. Lamieras said it about Maddison too. Lameiras' and Armstrong's early season form depended on Maddison, both Armstrong and Lameiras possess technical ability which is far better than League 1 but there's no middle man linking it all up.
You only notice how important a player is when he's out of the team. Take Armstrong out the team, you'll still be pretty confident, same with Lameiras. JM is the Cov version of Scholes.
And? If it was 7 from 4? 5 from 4? I think Maddison's absence is coincidental. We'd obviously have ups and downs. It's still a young side who are unfamiliar with certain types of opposition. The way Robins plays with two holding midfielders would be difficult to play against, particularly when TM changes the system.
I'd also be worried about any side that was depending on one player to make it tick, and even more worried if it was depending on an as-yet-unproven teenager.
Well we're also depending on Armstrong.....and now Kent.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
And i cant edit a spelling mistake because it deletes my post , so apologies vest is best lol