Replays of incidents (10 Viewers)

SBT

Well-Known Member
Whichever way you want to look at it, he shouldn't be given a game which involves a team local to him. Plenty of other games he could have been given which completely eliminates anyone drawing any conclusions either way.
Surely there was a southern England ref who could have been appointed? To avoid any suggestion of bias.
I have no idea if the FA has that many refs floating around that they're able to do this. But I don't imagine that a 'top' ref is much more likely to deliberately perform badly to help out a local team than a player is.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
I have no idea if the FA has that many refs floating around that they're able to do this. But I don't imagine that a 'top' ref is much more likely to deliberately perform badly to help out a local team than a player is.
It would have been a swap, not a need for an additional match official.
They really should have to say why such on field decisions were made. Some accountability would help.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
It would have been a swap, not a need for an additional match official.
They really should have to say why such on field decisions were made. Some accountability would help.
I don't think it's necessarily that straightforward, but more than anything I think people just need to accept that when referees are crap it's almost always for non-nefarious reasons.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
I don't think it's necessarily that straightforward, but more than anything I think people just need to accept that when referees are crap it's almost always for non-nefarious reasons.
Including David Coote?

The trouble with your assertion “almost always for non- nefarious reasons” is that, by definition, it means that sometimes they are crap for nefarious reasons.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
At Cardiff away they delayed the game for a while and asked if there was a qualified ref in the stands. That surely can't be right even for 4th duties but what I dont understand is that the appointed ref who got injured, why cant he then become the 4th? Basically the job is hold up the number for the subs and tell the coaching staff to keep in their lines. He could do that sitting down.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Many year ago, a colleague recounted a conversation he had had with a crap ref, along these lines. No idea if it is apochryphal or not, but it amused me at the time.

Player - “ If I called you a c unit would you book me?”
Ref - “Yes”
Player - “If I thought you were a c unit would you book me?”
Ref - “No”
Player - “ In that case, I think you are a c-unit”

Supposedly no booking👼
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Yes - even David Coote, the most famous of all compromised refs in the history of shit refs, didn't make decisions based on which local team he supported.
But he was making decisions for nefarious reasons wasn’t he?

You didn’t limit the range or definitions of nefariousnes.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
How many proven cases have there been in this country in the last 25 years?
How often are complaints actually investigated beyond the “ referees decision is final?”

My problem is that I am a cynical, suspicious bastard who finds it very difficult to understand why identical fouls within 5 minutes of each other are given to one team but not the other.

To take it away from my Sky Blue specs, how was Dragusic not given at least a second yellow yesterday. Spurs should have been down to 10 men in normal time. The ref gave Spurs far too much respect - in my view. Some of Spurs tackling was far more agricultural than Tamworth’s.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Many year ago, a colleague recounted a conversation he had had with a crap ref, along these lines. No idea if it is apochryphal or not, but it amused me at the time.

Player - “ If I called you a c unit would you book me?”
Ref - “Yes”
Player - “If I thought you were a c unit would you book me?”
Ref - “No”
Player - “ In that case, I think you are a c-unit”

Supposedly no booking👼
I’d laugh at that too depending on the game

My lad far braver than me. He’s not as assertive as me but he’s only just 18

Free kick not given
Player - ref you’re a speccy twat
My lad ref - red card for abusive language
Player - walks off
Coach (u16) I think - you can’t send a player off for questioning a decision
My lad - I didn’t he called me a speccy twat
Coach - ah ok

lol
 
Last edited:

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
You tell me, was he? He wasn't removed from his job for anything he did during a game.
to be fair it never got that far as the coke video came out

it was likely they'd start to question decisions he gave against liverpool and look into them in further detail
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
to be fair it never got that far as the coke video came out

it was likely they'd start to question decisions he gave against liverpool and look into them in further detail
"To be fair" there's no proof that Coote was doing anything other than mouthing off in private about a known douchebag who had given him shit over a contentious decision.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
How often are complaints actually investigated beyond the “ referees decision is final?”

My problem is that I am a cynical, suspicious bastard who finds it very difficult to understand why identical fouls within 5 minutes of each other are given to one team but not the other.

To take it away from my Sky Blue specs, how was Dragusic not given at least a second yellow yesterday. Spurs should have been down to 10 men in normal time. The ref gave Spurs far too much respect - in my view. Some of Spurs tackling was far more agricultural than Tamworth’s.
The two decisions were the foul not given for the shoulder in the back at one end and two seconds later decision given spurs way
Both clear free kicks

Same in our game - lots of occasions where the same incident recieved a different sanction

I’m fine with that during a game with different levels of aggression or time of the game but this was in the same minute

both refs were lucky things didn’t escalate but aren’t we all
 

Potbellypig

Well-Known Member
I have no idea if the FA has that many refs floating around that they're able to do this. But I don't imagine that a 'top' ref is much more likely to deliberately perform badly to help out a local team than a player is.
Sub-conscious bias. We all have it in us, one way or another. We'll of course never know if Tom Kirk was driving back down the motorway laughing to himself that he very nearly got his mates Sheffield Wednesday team into the next round, but I know what I watched on Saturday evening.

He got a lot wrong, was extremely biased to one team and his mark from the assessors will be low, and that's a slight consolation I suppose.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Sub-conscious bias. We all have it in us, one way or another. We'll of course never know if Tom Kirk was driving back down the motorway laughing to himself that he very nearly got his mates Sheffield Wednesday team into the next round, but I know what I watched on Saturday evening.

He got a lot wrong, was extremely biased to one team and his mark from the assessors will be low, and that's a slight consolation I suppose.
Sub-conscious bias obviously exists, but I'm not aware of any meaningful way we can control for it, and filtering referees according to where they live certainly doesn't. It makes no more sense to assume a referee from Yorkshire will perform badly in Saturday's game than it does to assume that Yorkshire's own Liam Kitching will do the same.
 

Potbellypig

Well-Known Member
Sub-conscious bias obviously exists, but I'm not aware of any meaningful way we can control for it, and filtering referees according to where they live certainly doesn't. It makes no more sense to assume a referee from Yorkshire will perform badly in Saturday's game than it does to assume that Yorkshire's own Liam Kitching will do the same.
Apart from that is complete and utter bollocks.

Michael Oliver from Ashington - Never refereed a Newcastle or Sunderland match
Martin Atkinson from Bradford - Never refereed a Bradford or Leeds match
Craig Pawson from Sheffield - Never refereed a Sheff Utd, Sheff Wed, Doncaster or Rotherham match, refereed 1 Barnsley match
Peter Bankes from Merseyside - Never refereed a Liverpool, Everton or Tranmere match
Robert Jones from Merseyside - Never refereed a Liverpool, Everton or Tranmere match

Seems the FA think you can control it.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Apart from that is complete and utter bollocks.

Michael Oliver from Ashington - Never refereed a Newcastle or Sunderland match
Martin Atkinson from Bradford - Never refereed a Bradford or Leeds match
Craig Pawson from Sheffield - Never refereed a Sheff Utd, Sheff Wed, Doncaster or Rotherham match, refereed 1 Barnsley match
Peter Bankes from Merseyside - Never refereed a Liverpool, Everton or Tranmere match
Robert Jones from Merseyside - Never refereed a Liverpool, Everton or Tranmere match

Seems the FA think you can control it.
So none of these referees have ever shown unconscious bias during a game?

If the FA want to stop certain referees from refereeing certain games to protect them from the howls of complaint from hyper-partisan fans then that's fine. But I don't think it's doing anything to improve the actual standard of refereeing.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Sub-conscious bias obviously exists, but I'm not aware of any meaningful way we can control for it, and filtering referees according to where they live certainly doesn't. It makes no more sense to assume a referee from Yorkshire will perform badly in Saturday's game than it does to assume that Yorkshire's own Liam Kitching will do the same.
Embarass them by getting them to explain themselves on camera, immediately post match, to managers who have identified issues. As Lampard had.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Don’t refs have to submit conflicts of interest so the FA can make sure they don’t ref those games? Same as when I mark exams I have to say if I’ve got family or a working relationship at any schools.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
So none of these referees have ever shown unconscious bias during a game?

If the FA want to stop certain referees from refereeing certain games to protect them from the howls of complaint from hyper-partisan fans then that's fine. But I don't think it's doing anything to improve the actual standard of refereeing.
Have to make a conscious decision to try it though.

Your approach seems submissive and mere acceptance of the status quo.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Embarass them by getting them to explain themselves on camera, immediately post match, to managers who have identified issues. As Lampard had.
I think referees should be able to speak to the press if they want to, and I'm all for more transparency with refs explaining how/why they made certain decisions. But if the intention is explicitly to "embarass them" then obviously it's not going to help anyone. I respect anyone who faces the press after a bad game, but no player, manager or referee is going to rush to speak if they know that copping to an honest mistake is going to result in people demanding they're instantly sacked for it.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
I think referees should be able to speak to the press if they want to, and I'm all for more transparency with refs explaining how/why they made certain decisions. But if the intention is explicitly to "embarass them" then obviously it's not going to help anyone. I respect anyone who faces the press after a bad game, but no player, manager or referee is going to rush to speak if they know that copping to an honest mistake is going to result in people demanding they're instantly sacked for it.
Shouldn’t be a choice, like for managers or head coaches.

Fear of the sack might concentrate the mind when making decisions.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
Have to make a conscious decision to try it though.

Your approach seems submissive and mere acceptance of the status quo.
If you can prove that it's a big factor in referees underperforming then I'm all for action to stamp it out - what's your evidence though?

The status quo seems pretty good to me....if you want to tinker further with how to officiate the world's most popular game then be my guest, VAR is working just great after all.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Whichever way you want to look at it, he shouldn't be given a game which involves a team local to him. Plenty of other games he could have been given which completely eliminates anyone drawing any conclusions either way.

He’s refereed games recently including Huddersfield and Barnsley. I’m sure we could have a referee from Wolverhampton couldn’t we?
 

willz121

Active Member
Just read on the Football Insider website that:

"Coventry were rightly disallowed a second goal in normal time before being taken to extra time and penalties in their FA Cup third round win over Sheffield Wednesday, Keith Hackett has said."

Three guesses where Keith Hackett is from... you got it in one... Sheffield!
 

AJB1983

Well-Known Member
Just read on the Football Insider website that:

"Coventry were rightly disallowed a second goal in normal time before being taken to extra time and penalties in their FA Cup third round win over Sheffield Wednesday, Keith Hackett has said."

Three guesses where Keith Hackett is from... you got it in one... Sheffield!
Mental. I couldn’t see a foul from the other end and nor can I on any of the replays/angles. BTA doesn’t even jump into the keeper - if anything his own player impedes him.
But again, I don’t know what a foul is any more.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Mental. I couldn’t see a foul from the other end and nor can I on any of the replays/angles. BTA doesn’t even jump into the keeper - if anything his own player impedes him.
But again, I don’t know what a foul is any more.
Neither do PGMOL referees

They don't seem to notice shirt pulling either

Or GK wasting time

Or the tactical GK "injury"

Or substituted players leaving the pitch by the longest possible route at the slowest possible shuffle.

Or fouls on Eccles in the penalty box (I would like to see an "independent view" on that one)
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top