Richardson (1 Viewer)

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
OSB - joy still seems to be insisting that SISU have invested over 60 million. i've been following the accounts for years and still don't get close to this figure they keep insisting on.
interviews in the press from various sisu figures a couple of years ago had the figure of around 40 million (think it was from TF and again from the "supersub" Dulieu).

yes I know I cant either
 

Haigha

New Member
That says "He" though :)


Ahhh... but in the article there is further reference to Richardson as 'he' by McGinnity that is in relation to a deed Richardson is supposed to have done while acting for the club:

"That was under my predecessor's regime," said McGinnity, "and he sometimes lived with his head in the clouds. He sold [Highfield Road] and the money was spent on players as opposed to reducing the debt."
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Didn't Lionel Bird or someone write a book that can only be published after his death? Or am I being a bit dramatic!

trouble is he will take the truth to the grave, we would all be pig sick if we knew the truth! as Jack Nicholson once said "you can't handle the Truth!"
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member

Astute

Well-Known Member
So he is still insisting that he sold land that hadn't been bought or owned by him or CCFC. And some still believe him
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
So he is still insisting that he sold land that hadn't been bought or owned by him or CCFC. And some still believe him 

Yes, I think HBG Construction put up the money to buy the land from BG (about £2M) when CCFC couldn't find the finance, then they sold it back to CCC (not CCFC) for a huge premium before the deal with Tesco (which BR may have negotiated) was done. Something like that and I'd be very surprised if BR took no fee for his brokerage services, but it is all shrouded in confidentiality agreements, so we have to wait till all parties are dead before any more facts emerge.
 
Last edited:

Nick

Administrator
Yes, I think HBG Construction put up the money to buy the land from BG (about £2M) when CCFC couldn't find the finance, then they sold it back to CCC (not CCFC) for a huge premium before the deal with Tesco (which BR may have negotiated) was done. Something like that and I'd be very surprised if BR took no fee for his brokerage services, but it is all shrouded in confidentiality agreements, so we have to wait till all parties are dead before any more facts emerge.

So HBG Construction made a cut, I wonder if anybody familiar has anything to do with them?
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
So HBG Construction made a cut, I wonder if anybody familiar has anything to do with them?

http://www.skybluetrust.co.uk/index...57-ricoh-arena-timeline?showall=1&limitstart=
14th July mortgage charge registered in favour of HBG Construction Limited. Security for loan agreement dated 14th July 1999 between HBG and Arena 2001 Limited. Floating charge over the Foleshill Gas works site. By 31/05/2001 Arena 2001 Limited owed £13.6m under this arrangement.

Paid for by:
Sale to Tesco .......................£59,420,000 (land owned by CCC bought from British Gas) source : Council minutes

I hope that this is helpful:
The Club never owned the gas works land: they had an option to buy it. They owned a company called Arena 2000. They hadn't any money to exercise the option on the land. The Council did a deal with Tesco which enabled them to buy the land when the Club couldn't and Arena 2000 effectively ceased to exist and a new partnership was formed: ACL. . Arena 2000/CCFC had no money to develop the Arena and it was after a tense meeting of the full Council in October 2003 that the building of the Arena was made safe with ACL as the leaseholder. Not only did the Club not have the money to be a part of the development of the Arena but they had no money to continue to operate as a football club. They sold their shares in ACL so that they wouldn't go into administration. They have an option to buy back those shares. The loan of £21m was not build the Arena. It was to fund an advance payment of rent by ACL.


http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...e-SISU-bullshit)?p=97085&viewfull=1#post97085
Who owns the land?

BY far the largest share of the land is owned by Dutch-owned HGB Properties. However, there are 30 other owners of small plots of land on the fringes of the site, which includes a small industrial estate.

The original proposal for the area included a 40,000-seater stadium, leisure facilities, district shopping centre with a giant Tesco and a new railway station and carparking.

HBG (the Hollandsche Beton Groep NV) built the Gelredome Stadium for Vitesse Arnhem in Holland.

It also built the 53,000 seater Schalke stadium in Germany which has a retractable pitch too.

The firm in recent years took over British building firm Higgs and Hill and it bought the land from original owners British Gas last October.

Land Registry documents show HBG got involved from the outset when Coventry City Football Club (Holdings Ltd) and Arena 2001 signed an agreement on July 14, 2000 to buy the land from British Gas.

All very confusing isn't it. Lot of wheeling & dealing going on.
 
Last edited:

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Coventry City chairman Bryan Richardson said: "This really is the beginning of something extraordinary for Coventry City, the city of Coventry and the West Midlands region.


"Arena 2000 will be the most modern and technologically advanced stadium in Europe, if not the world.


"Features such as the retractable pitch and roof have never been seen in this country."


He said the arena would allow the Sky Blues to earn more revenue and attract bigger crowds, better players and new investment.


Arena 2000 will be in use every day of the week and will be the biggest indoor concert venue in the country.


The project is expected to create thousands of jobs, helping with the re-generation of the area.
 

singers_pore

Well-Known Member
The club paid BR a massive bonus for arranging the deal with Tesco. According to the accounts the bonus made him the highest paid club Chairman in the Prem. Not sure why the club paid the bonus given that they apparently did not get any of the Tesco money. Very strange. Why are we cursed with such bad owners and Chairmen?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
The club paid BR a massive bonus for arranging the deal with Tesco. According to the accounts the bonus made him the highest paid club Chairman in the Prem. Not sure why the club paid the bonus given that they apparently did not get any of the Tesco money. Very strange. Why are we cursed with such bad owners and Chairmen?

CCFC didn't get any money as they didn't have anything to sell. The money received from HR didn't even go towards the project.

What he failed to mention was the money paid by Tescos covered buying the land and the decontamination of it. Nothing else. We couldn't even afford our wage bill and were heavily in debt so couldn't raise any money to build his pipe dream. The money received went on the wage bill to cover it for a few months. Yet all he does is try to blame everyone else for what happened.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
What he failed to mention was the money paid by Tescos covered buying the land and the decontamination of it. Nothing else.

Tesco paid £59.4m, land and decontamination costs are itemised in the completion report but are included in other costs (land acquisition costs, decontamination and infrastructure, siteprofiling, fees, joint venture operating costs and interest payable during the constructionperiod). All of that totals £52.5m.
 

olderskyblue

Well-Known Member

Astute

Well-Known Member
Tesco paid £59.4m, land and decontamination costs are itemised in the completion report but are included in other costs (land acquisition costs, decontamination and infrastructure, siteprofiling, fees, joint venture operating costs and interest payable during the constructionperiod). All of that totals £52.5m.

And the 6.9m would have built us what?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
And the 6.9m would have built us what?

What's your point? The whole project cost £115.8m. The Tesco deal was £59.4m, so 51.3% of the total cost. Richardson's standpoint is that this deal was done by him on behalf of the club and therefore CCFC contributed 51.3% (actually would be higher due to the interest) of the total cost and therefore should have had a similar stake.

The council must have agreed with this at some point as the original idea was for CCFC to own 50% of the freehold.
 

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
How did it go from the land being owned by CCFC to freehold to Council? Where did the 66 million go?

Now Nick stop being so Naive... where politicians are involved corruption usually goes hand in hand with it along with lies avarice and deceit
 

SkyBlueSid

Well-Known Member
Richardson has kept quiet for years, presumably as a result of these confidentiality clauses. It would be interesting to be able to unpick it all with the benefit of hindsight. I believe Richardson was by no means the only one who was responsible for the mess the club got into. Robinson and McGinnity were others, along with the one that was hands-on throughout but tends to be forgotten, namely Graham Hover.

My opinion has always been that any investigation should have been a criminal one, by the Fraud Squad. Far too many stones remain unturned.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
We are the Sweeney and we haven't had any dinner! We need Jack Regan to punch a few guts.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
The council put in £10m and got 100% ownership of the freehold and 50% ownership of ACL.

Wrong, the equity injected was £10M, the Council also paid £24M for the land. It is in Appendix 2 of the Council Construction report under the heading land acquisition. I do wish you wouldn't misrepresent the facts.
 

Ibby

Well-Known Member
So Richardson explain the interest free loans & confidentiality agreements. Great businessman when you rent back your 'home' for what you sold it for, leaving you potless. Never commented before but l can't believe this man dare show his face
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Wrong, the equity injected was £10M, the Council also paid £24M for the land. It is in Appendix 2 of the Council Construction report under the heading land acquisition. I do wish you wouldn't misrepresent the facts.

Appendix 2 is a company structure diagram? Appendix 1 is the outturn report, is that what you are referring to? It lists the land purchase as £24m but as far as I can see doesn't say the council put £24m in to cover that.

If the council did in fact put £34m in then that means there is over £20m that is unaccounted for - where did that go?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Appendix 2 is a company structure diagram? Appendix 1 is the outturn report, is that what you are referring to? It lists the land purchase as £24m but as far as I can see doesn't say the council put £24m in to cover that.

If the council did in fact put £34m in then that means there is over £20m that is unaccounted for - where did that go?

Towards building a stadium.

So CCFC put in how much? If we had at least bought the land so some could be sold then yes. But nothing was paid for so nothing could be sold. Richardson says that he sold it to Tesco. He couldn't have. Yet you believe everything he says.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
I don't believe any of them. But we are still where we are now and only the future can change our position.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Towards building a stadium.

Stadium cost (including buying land) was £118.7m.

The funding was £10m from CCC, £59.4 Tesco deal, £9.6m in interest, £0.5m hotel, £5m residual land sale, £21m borrowing, £4.4m ERDF grant, ACL £1.1m, AWM grant £4.8m. That totals £115.8m

Jack stated the council put in an additional £24m for land. In that case there is a surplus of £21.1m that doesn't appear to be accounted for.

So CCFC put in how much?

£6,808,425

If we had at least bought the land so some could be sold then yes.

Did we ever own the site? I thought HBG took the site as security on a loan to Arena 2001 (and then later took ownership), that couldn't have happened without ownership. Might have that completely wrong, don't have the documents to hand and its been a long time since i read them.

Yet you believe everything he says.

Can you show me where i have said I believe everything he says? What I've actually said is that it is Richardson's view.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Stadium cost (including buying land) was £118.7m.

The funding was £10m from CCC, £59.4 Tesco deal, £9.6m in interest, £0.5m hotel, £5m residual land sale, £21m borrowing, £4.4m ERDF grant, ACL £1.1m, AWM grant £4.8m. That totals £115.8m

Jack stated the council put in an additional £24m for land. In that case there is a surplus of £21.1m that doesn't appear to be accounted for.



£6,808,425



Did we ever own the site? I thought HBG took the site as security on a loan to Arena 2001 (and then later took ownership), that couldn't have happened without ownership. Might have that completely wrong, don't have the documents to hand and its been a long time since i read them.



Can you show me where i have said I believe everything he says? What I've actually said is that it is Richardson's view.

Check your figures. CCFC put in 1.7m. I am 100% sure on that.

And Tescos paid for the land. We never owned it not even for a day.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top