Zebra
New Member
well they wanted to go, fuck them off and keep hyam?
clearly hyam didn’t want to go, so why would we sell him
well they wanted to go, fuck them off and keep hyam?You ever heard of a transfer window?
well they wanted to go, fuck them off and keep hyam?
clearly hyam didn’t want to go, so why would we sell him
Obviously morale is very fragile at the club and certainly on this forum. Does anybody feel that those who are spreading stories are part of the problem at the club and on here?
We need him, at least until January, our right back position is dodgy to say the least
hahaha, good one dude. you must be one of those guysDay off school?
How do we all sign up for these voice-mails? Is it a new club service to generate new revenue? Sign-up for Tim Fisher heavy breathing. Boddy on how to maintain your lawn? Joy’s advice on defaulting on bonds?I received this too. Said Leeds were offering 18m which I didn’t find plausible but very wishful thinking.
Kanes issue was attitude to deny that is foolish - Better Days posted that he is far too forthright and was frozen out and he would be a reliable source of information - same regarding Cashman
The only person who appears to be trying to minimise their knowledge here and question the integrity is you
So they were all wrong then?
Which proves the blokes point that whilst they are very informed individuals not everything that they say should be taken as gospel
I didn't say his attitude wasn't an issue.
But to go from 'he has an attitude issue' to 'he's shagging another player's wife' is quite the fucking leap and that's the point I'm making - some people just seem desperate to create drama and scandal out of everything.
And I never questioned SBB or BD's integrity.
No ITK suggested he was shagging a players wife infact I believe one squashed it as nonsense
fair fucks if he shagged someone’s wife, hope if was hamers. might want to hide yours the TK is on the looseI didn't say his attitude wasn't an issue.
But to go from 'he has an attitude issue' to 'he's shagging another player's wife' is quite the fucking leap and that's the point I'm making - some people just seem desperate to create drama and scandal out of everything.
And I never questioned SBB or BD's integrity.
Just popped by to say technically it’s an initialismITK as an acronym annoys me.
And I’ll say it, all the ITK’s annoy me. Fuck off basically.
Tide is turning at the club, tide is turning with patience for the players. And the tide, for me at least, has turned with these ITK lot.
And the negative lot as well. I’d quite happily sit with my dad knowing fuck all as he doesn’t go on ‘the internet’ and just be annoyed at the results.
I never said they did.
If you insist on starting an argument please at least read what you are arguing against first.
Just popped by to say technically it’s an initialism
Better Days source was I believe one of Kanes best mates in the club
Marvin Gaye. He would often hear it on the grape vine.Jones or Shipley?
Jones or Shipley?
Just popped by to say technically it’s an initialism
Going back to the start of the season who actually refused to play on the pitch because sure it wasn't that bad as Godden Stated a week ago.Due to the games being off has cost us alot of revenue and probably the reason Hyam was sold.Also playing Rotherham,Wigan are games we would of expected to win which then guarantees the momentum continuing from last season.
This is what I was asking who deemed the pitch unsafe?I thought MR went there and said it was unsafe.What do you mean who refused? The pitch was deemed unsafe independently
2 referees and an independant EFL rep deemed it unsafe.This is what I was asking who deemed the pitch unsafe?I thought MR went there and said it was unsafe.
I think what @coop is asking is who from the club initialy decided that the pitch was not playable? The game wasnt cancelled on the day by a ref, nor was it randomly inspected. Someone at the club must have decided it was not playable / safe in order for the chain of events to follow. Sorry if I've got this wrong.2 referees and an independant EFL rep deemed it unsafe.
Not all, but they are not helping.
Without sounding too conspiratorial, it’s patently obvious that there are a couple of accounts here being used to sow seeds of unrest and provoke negative lines of thought.Obviously morale is very fragile at the club and certainly on this forum. Does anybody feel that those who are spreading stories are part of the problem at the club and on here?
Yes this what I'm trying to get at.But gone now so I suppose we all have to get behind the team and prey.I think what @coop is asking is who from the club initialy decided that the pitch was not playable? The game wasnt cancelled on the day by a ref, nor was it randomly inspected. Someone at the club must have decided it was not playable / safe in order for the chain of events to follow. Sorry if I've got this wrong.
Yes this what I'm trying to get at.But gone now so I suppose we all have to get behind the team and prey.
An acronymWhen used as In The Know - is it a simple abbreviation?
Without sounding too conspiratorial, it’s patently obvious that there are a couple of accounts here being used to sow seeds of unrest and provoke negative lines of thought.
If the fruit is rotten, cut off the branch.
I’m not condoning decapitation there, by the way.
I think members here need to be a tad more discerning, and less roused to despair.
itkay?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?