Right then who is in the know… The alleged trouble in the camp? (1 Viewer)

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Obviously morale is very fragile at the club and certainly on this forum. Does anybody feel that those who are spreading stories are part of the problem at the club and on here?

I think some posters on social media don't realise the damage they can cause. How they can affect players confidence, especially young players. Also it can affect team moral and create an atmosphere of uncertainty. It can also undermine the messages from the manager and coaching staff.
 
Last edited:

Hobo

Well-Known Member
We need him, at least until January, our right back position is dodgy to say the least

I agree, he is a good footballer and we need him playing and he needs to play too; even if it is to move on in January.

Kane playing can benefit both parties.
 

Batu1969

Active Member
I received this too. Said Leeds were offering 18m which I didn’t find plausible but very wishful thinking.
How do we all sign up for these voice-mails? Is it a new club service to generate new revenue? Sign-up for Tim Fisher heavy breathing. Boddy on how to maintain your lawn? Joy’s advice on defaulting on bonds?
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Kanes issue was attitude to deny that is foolish - Better Days posted that he is far too forthright and was frozen out and he would be a reliable source of information - same regarding Cashman

The only person who appears to be trying to minimise their knowledge here and question the integrity is you

I didn't say his attitude wasn't an issue.

But to go from 'he has an attitude issue' to 'he's shagging another player's wife' is quite the fucking leap and that's the point I'm making - some people just seem desperate to create drama and scandal out of everything.

And I never questioned SBB or BD's integrity.
 

Nick

Administrator
So they were all wrong then?

Which proves the blokes point that whilst they are very informed individuals not everything that they say should be taken as gospel

Think people need to figure out timings and context etc.

If something is touch and go and flip between off and on and there are small updates coming out, it doesn't mean it was wrong at that time.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I didn't say his attitude wasn't an issue.

But to go from 'he has an attitude issue' to 'he's shagging another player's wife' is quite the fucking leap and that's the point I'm making - some people just seem desperate to create drama and scandal out of everything.

And I never questioned SBB or BD's integrity.

No ITK suggested he was shagging a players wife infact I believe one squashed it as nonsense
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
No ITK suggested he was shagging a players wife infact I believe one squashed it as nonsense

I never said they did.

If you insist on starting an argument please at least read what you are arguing against first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vow

Zebra

New Member
I didn't say his attitude wasn't an issue.

But to go from 'he has an attitude issue' to 'he's shagging another player's wife' is quite the fucking leap and that's the point I'm making - some people just seem desperate to create drama and scandal out of everything.

And I never questioned SBB or BD's integrity.
fair fucks if he shagged someone’s wife, hope if was hamers. might want to hide yours the TK is on the loose
 

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member
ITK as an acronym annoys me.
And I’ll say it, all the ITK’s annoy me. Fuck off basically.

Tide is turning at the club, tide is turning with patience for the players. And the tide, for me at least, has turned with these ITK lot.

And the negative lot as well. I’d quite happily sit with my dad knowing fuck all as he doesn’t go on ‘the internet’ and just be annoyed at the results.
Just popped by to say technically it’s an initialism
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I never said they did.

If you insist on starting an argument please at least read what you are arguing against first.

You said SBB gets lots wrong didn'y you?
 

usskyblue

Well-Known Member
6sazub.jpg
 

coop

Well-Known Member
Going back to the start of the season who actually refused to play on the pitch because sure it wasn't that bad as Godden Stated a week ago.Due to the games being off has cost us alot of revenue and probably the reason Hyam was sold.Also playing Rotherham,Wigan are games we would of expected to win which then guarantees the momentum continuing from last season.
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
Going back to the start of the season who actually refused to play on the pitch because sure it wasn't that bad as Godden Stated a week ago.Due to the games being off has cost us alot of revenue and probably the reason Hyam was sold.Also playing Rotherham,Wigan are games we would of expected to win which then guarantees the momentum continuing from last season.

What do you mean who refused? The pitch was deemed unsafe independently
 

1ccfc

Well-Known Member
2 referees and an independant EFL rep deemed it unsafe.
I think what @coop is asking is who from the club initialy decided that the pitch was not playable? The game wasnt cancelled on the day by a ref, nor was it randomly inspected. Someone at the club must have decided it was not playable / safe in order for the chain of events to follow. Sorry if I've got this wrong.
 

ProfessorbyGrace

Well-Known Member
Not all, but they are not helping.
Obviously morale is very fragile at the club and certainly on this forum. Does anybody feel that those who are spreading stories are part of the problem at the club and on here?
Without sounding too conspiratorial, it’s patently obvious that there are a couple of accounts here being used to sow seeds of unrest and provoke negative lines of thought.
If the fruit is rotten, cut off the branch.

I’m not condoning decapitation there, by the way.

I think members here need to be a tad more discerning, and less roused to despair.
 

coop

Well-Known Member
I think what @coop is asking is who from the club initialy decided that the pitch was not playable? The game wasnt cancelled on the day by a ref, nor was it randomly inspected. Someone at the club must have decided it was not playable / safe in order for the chain of events to follow. Sorry if I've got this wrong.
Yes this what I'm trying to get at.But gone now so I suppose we all have to get behind the team and prey.
 

Happy_Martian

Well-Known Member

AOM

Well-Known Member
Without sounding too conspiratorial, it’s patently obvious that there are a couple of accounts here being used to sow seeds of unrest and provoke negative lines of thought.
If the fruit is rotten, cut off the branch.

I’m not condoning decapitation there, by the way.

I think members here need to be a tad more discerning, and less roused to despair.

There are definitely a lot more "ITK" accounts cropping up on here recently aside from the usual reliable ones. It's pretty strange
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top