D
But it was also concessions to regeneration (to get him on board) that helped accentuate conditions that made the ground more about that, and less about the club.You could ask Dave Nellist.
His was the decisive vote.
Said he wished he'd made fan representation on the board a condition.
Found them very reasonable FP.The robbing bastard put my premium up 33% last year, some solidarity with ccfc fans
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
While you're on here Simon, next time you make a shit video can you not pay a girl to laugh at every comment. It's really annoying
Concessions from where?But it was also concessions to regeneration (to get him on board) that helped accentuate conditions that made the ground more about that, and less about the club.
I only wrote off 3 cars as wellFound them very reasonable FP.
Second year with them and less this year than last.
£320, down to £290 B-)
Haha!I only wrote off 3 cars as well
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
Nope (well, yep to the Tories, nope to the Neillist thing).Concessions from where?
The ruling Conservative group were anti, weren't they?
While you're on here Simon, next time you make a shit video can you not pay a girl to laugh at every comment. It's really annoying
Here did Brett's go or did they go bust?
It was good when PWKH used to post quite openly and honestly on here.
I think I understand what you are saying :emoji_thumbsup:
Not what I was after, but I'm ill... and it's good enoughConcessions from where?
The ruling Conservative group were anti, weren't they?
ONLY three-strong but key players. They secured a promise that any profit over the £5 million expected from selling off extra land at the Arena site would be ploughed back into the council - and won a promise jobs would be heavily advertised to Coventry people, that they would get help in applying for the jobs.
Dave Nellist said he wanted more community facilities. He also asked for the future profit to be split more in favour of the council.
The one you made a story out of with a click bait headline?
When haven't I?Oh you know what click bait is now?
Common sense approach Dongonzalos, I too feel that we should be welcoming Simon's presence on here.
I read the Coventry Telegraph on line and don't understand the vitriol aimed at it and Simon.
I have read his book and found it a decent insight in to events over a long period and with the input of the protagonists.
Point 1. I would be pretty mad if it's true that he/family got death threats.
Point 2. Do you need permission to post photos of people in public?
No he doesn't, which is why he looks on here. It's why we all look on here.But Don, that's the point , he doesn't know any more than us.
I would say that a few people on social media are more in the know ( so to speak)than he is.
Tbf though , the CET has been utter tosh for many years. If it completely dissappeared tomorrow I doubt many would miss it.
Not what I was after, but I'm ill... and it's good enough
What they all had to say ...; COVENTRY ARENA DECISION. - Free Online Library
So, maybe not unwarranted from a council POV (he was concerned about social services cuts) but ended up aggravating the conditions that meant ground and club would always be running opposing to one another.
When haven't I?
I can't be a arsed to find it, but you definitely said "what's click bait" in reply to one of my posts.
He has said a lot but who can be bothered to troll through thousands of posts to find it.I can't be a arsed to find it, but you definitely said "what's click bait" in reply to one of my posts.
It was a City fan that broke the story, yet more ridiculous conspiracy theories. March on Monday? We're playing RochdaleAny way enough of this distraction shit.
Like I said earlier this is just a way of trying to detract away from the march on Monday.
Cov and Charlton fans marching together again from the Cherry Tree.
Now Wembley is over the time is right to remind our owners we are still here and not gong away.
Looks like all the Protesting Charlton have done has paid off and Roland has decided to sell after say that he wouldn't, so shows that protesting can work.
This has given us a new lease of life to crank up the action.
PUSB .
Fuck Off Sisu..........
Isnt the march on friday...please correct me if im wrongAny way enough of this distraction shit.
Like I said earlier this is just a way of trying to detract away from the march on Monday.
Cov and Charlton fans marching together again from the Cherry Tree.
Now Wembley is over the time is right to remind our owners we are still here and not gong away.
Looks like all the Protesting Charlton have done has paid off and Roland has decided to sell after say that he wouldn't, so shows that protesting can work.
This has given us a new lease of life to crank up the action.
PUSB .
Fuck Off Sisu..........
It was a City fan that broke the story, yet more ridiculous conspiracy theories. March on Monday? We're playing Rochdale
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
Just like the City fan who threw everything at fellow City fans to stop the last one.It was a City fan that broke the story, yet more ridiculous conspiracy theories. March on Monday? We're playing Rochdale
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
As a kid I'd walk past and hear the noise guess it wouldn't be allowed nowTaken over by J & HB Jackson - they started out as a couple of scrap metal dealers - I think Bretts lasted in some form until mid 1980's then went with Coventry Climax, Masseys and others
Not allowed at the Ricoh you might wake them up in blocks 20-22As a kid I'd walk past and hear the noise guess it wouldn't be allowed now
I can't be a arsed to find it, but you definitely said "what's click bait" in reply to one of my posts.
but if I recall correctly he was isolated as he didn't agree with the direction being taken by the board and eventually resigned due to the disagreementsThen I would question why he was a director at all for 3 years. Unfortunately a board of directors has joint and several liability and someone being busy elsewhere does not excuse them from their responsibilities to CCFC. It is not an excuse that would stand up in court. By allowing others to take actions without his involvement is still making a contribution to the mess. If he could not fulfil his duties because of other commitments he should have resigned his directorship. Harsh I know but CCFC has carried far too many passengers on and off the pitch over the decades. Doesn't make him a bad person but CCFC problems require a fully committed Board of Directors going forward can he provide that commitment
Taken over by J & HB Jackson - they started out as a couple of scrap metal dealers - I think Bretts lasted in some form until mid 1980's then went with Coventry Climax, Masseys and others
As I understand it they had board meeting s and voted out the thief Richardson aspirations on many matters yet he went behind the boards back and continued with the help of secretary Hover who disappeared in to the shade quickly afterwards and due to Richardson the thief leaving the club skint when they tried to sue he counter sued for unfair dismissal as CEO ( 2nd highest payed behind Martin Edwards Man U who were champions) and they couldn't afford to defend it.True, the point of the sale was all about attempting to save some of their wealth, they were idiots for letting Bryan have control.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?