Rumour: Hoffman and Elliot takeover negotiations (21 Viewers)

Paxman II · May 22, 2017

We all despise SISU but you must ask questions about the new owners funding and how they would see the future for the club. Especially if it involves giving future earnings back over to SISU.
How would that affect us? Could we we worse off in a short space of time? Does it include a long term deal at the Ricoh with some share of non match day revenues? Hoffman must have a financial plan that will at the very least move the club forward and sustain it in the median long term, involving funds for investment over and above what we can generate ourselves while being a lot better than the 'current' SISU management.
His 3 bids suggest otherwise to me. I think fans would rather have a clean break from SISU and not have the club anchored to them for years to come. That's needs a much bigger cash bid not something worth 'up to 10m' based on sharing future income potential and thus making their tenure difficult from day one.

Astute · May 22, 2017

Paxman II said:
We all despise SISU but you must ask questions about the new owners funding and how they would see the future for the club.

Have you not read this thread today?

One more has come forward. He says he is willing to put money in and doesn't expect a return.

Why don't you put your energy into finding out how much Joy wants for bringing our club to its knees. Then they can work out how much they will have left to take our club forward. Or if she wants so much nobody would be stupid enough to pay it.

Ian1779 · May 22, 2017

matesx said:
Tim has been very quiet.

Not a peep for weeks.

Hopefully clearing out his cupboard at Ryton.

Nick · May 22, 2017

Ian1779 said:
Hopefully clearing out his cupboard at Ryton.

Breaking: Tim Fisher clearing out cupboard.

dongonzalos · May 22, 2017

Nick said:
£3m was just an example. For proof of funds you just prove you can pay what you are offering.

You don't come out shouting you have just sold your business for £200+m when you have offered £2m and big it up with unachievable addons that both they and SISU will know won't happen. So if they have bid £2m, just show them £2m in the bank / escrow. If you do a higher bid up front, show them that.

That's not me saying he should plough every penny he ever has into CCFC either.

To be fair I don't think he personally has talked about the sale of the company he part owned did he?

Nick · May 22, 2017

dongonzalos said:
To be fair I don't think he personally has talked about the sale of the company he part owned did he?

Yes he did mention it, however I'm not saying he has or hasn't got money or saying whatever he does have he should plough in. Far from it.

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT · May 22, 2017

skybluebeduff said:
Has the drop in ST sales made the budget cut? Didn't we just sign a player for a fee whilst ST sales are low?

Players WILL be SOLD to make up the sort fall in season ticket sales, imop .

Astute · May 22, 2017

Nick said:
Yes he did mention it, however I'm not saying he has or hasn't got money or saying whatever he does have he should plough in. Far from it.

You was insinuating that he wanted us to sell less season tickets though.

Astute · May 22, 2017

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT said:
Players WILL be SOLD to make up the sort fall in season ticket sales, imop .

I don't have a problem with it if the players won't be used next season. Small budget = only keep who we will need. We need to rebuild to get promoted. And that is happening.

robbiekeane · May 22, 2017

Astute said:
You was insinuating

Oh dear

ccfc92 · May 22, 2017

Astute said:
I don't have a problem with it if the players won't be used next season. Small budget = only keep who we will need. We need to rebuild to get promoted. And that is happening.

*also as long as those sold/released gives more funds to MR to build a good squad.

Astute · May 22, 2017

robbiekeane said:
Oh dear

Sorry will keep words down to 5 letters or less for you when I can.

ccfc92 · May 22, 2017

Astute said:
Sorry will keep words down to 5 letters or less for you when I can.

Meow :joyful:

robbiekeane · May 22, 2017

Astute said:
Sorry will keep words down to 5 letters or less for you when I can.

Nibble

Astute · May 22, 2017

robbiekeane said:
Nibble

Big word from you I see.

robbiekeane · May 22, 2017

Astute said:
Big word from you I see.

You know I was referring to your use of "was" instead of "were" though right? Rather than your massive word

6 Generations · May 22, 2017

Skybluefaz said:
Jim White? He's uninformed on the whole situation inspite of the rantings. Shane O'connor conducted the best interviews with Labovitch I think it was at the time. I'd like him to get his teeth into Fisher.

In what way is Jim White I'll- informed?

hill83 · May 22, 2017

robbiekeane said:
You know I was referring to your use of "was" instead of "were" though right? Rather than your massive word

i dont fink he duz

robbiethemole · May 22, 2017

Paxman II said:
We all despise SISU but you must ask questions about the new owners funding and how they would see the future for the club. Especially if it involves giving future earnings back over to SISU.
How would that affect us? Could we we worse off in a short space of time? Does it include a long term deal at the Ricoh with some share of non match day revenues? Hoffman must have a financial plan that will at the very least move the club forward and sustain it in the median long term, involving funds for investment over and above what we can generate ourselves while being a lot better than the 'current' SISU management.
His 3 bids suggest otherwise to me. I think fans would rather have a clean break from SISU and not have the club anchored to them for years to come. That's needs a much bigger cash bid not something worth 'up to 10m' based on sharing future income potential and thus making their tenure difficult from day one.

What right do you or I, or any anonymous poster on here, have to question potential new owners??
do you think they will take any notice of what's posted on SBT before they negotiate with SISU, in case they upset posters on here.
I for one welcome them knowing they can't possibly get as bad as the scum in charge now, and being on speaking terms with Hoff, know he has the club's best interest at heart.

Skyblueweeman · May 22, 2017

Astute said:
Have you not read this thread today?

One more has come forward. He says he is willing to put money in and doesn't expect a return.

Why don't you put your energy into finding out how much Joy wants for bringing our club to its knees. Then they can work out how much they will have left to take our club forward. Or if she wants so much nobody would be stupid enough to pay it.

To be fair, I'm sure SISU said they'd be great when they arrive.

I understand the questioning by some. Like I've said previously, no point jumping out of the pan and into the fire.

I'm not saying that in any way, any of these potential newbies are going to be worse than SISU but no one can guarantee that.

It's great that he's come out and shown his interest but hasn't it now come out that there's some sort of link to another hedge fund?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Astute · May 22, 2017

robbiekeane said:
You know I was referring to your use of "was" instead of "were" though right? Rather than your massive word

There is only one thing worse than someone who corrects someone's grammar. That is someone who tries to correct someone's grammar when it is used correctly.

Was vs. Were: What’s the Difference? - Writing Explained

hill83 · May 22, 2017

Astute said:
There is only one thing worse than someone who corrects someone's grammar. That is someone who tries to correct someone's grammar when it is used correctly.

Was vs. Were: What’s the Difference? - Writing Explained

There is absolutely no way that 'you was' is correct. Sorry.

Astute · May 22, 2017

hill83 said:
There is absolutely no way that 'you was' is correct. Sorry.

In the context used yes was correct.

hill83 · May 22, 2017

No

The link you have given even shows you that you were wrong.

I'm hoping this is a wind up.

Astute · May 22, 2017

hill83 said:
No

The link you have given even shows you that you were wrong.

Let me just check what I said :smuggrin:

hill83 · May 22, 2017

I love a grammar argument. The best bit is when someone suggests it's a spelling error instead.

Astute · May 22, 2017

Astute said:
Let me just check what I said :smuggrin:

I stand corrected. A lot of difference between he and you....should have checked which I said and not with several Stellas down my neck :wideyed:

Astute · May 22, 2017

hill83 said:
I love a grammar argument. The best bit is when someone suggests it's a spelling error instead.

Auto correct is my favourite :shifty:

Astute · May 22, 2017

Had better go to bed. Don't want to say c**t instead of count. Can't be swearing on here.

hill83 · May 22, 2017

Astute said:
I stand corrected. A lot of difference between he and you....should have checked which I said and not with several Stellas down my neck :wideyed:

dongonzalos · May 22, 2017

Nick said:
Yes he did mention it, however I'm not saying he has or hasn't got money or saying whatever he does have he should plough in. Far from it.

I thought the CET have mentioned it. I didn't think he was quoted as saying that?
Or did he say it in CWR, I never heard that interview?

Ibby · May 23, 2017

I hope he buys the club. He is very keen.

robbiekeane · May 23, 2017

hill83 said:
No

The link you have given even shows you that you were wrong.

I'm hoping this is a wind up.

Really enjoyed this

hill83 · May 23, 2017

robbiekeane said:
Really enjoyed this

Was you laughing?

Skybluefaz · May 23, 2017

6 Generations said:
In what way is Jim White I'll- informed?

Nick mentioned earlier about Jim getting on at Fisher to pay fans travel costs to Wembley. He just didn't seem to get the point of why fans are so frustrated with sisu when I listened to the interview. That was my take on it anyway.

Rumour: Hoffman and Elliot takeover negotiations (21 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency