Nick
Administrator
Going towards running the club, as they would then without the other 50%...
But transfer fees are not going towards ccfc for team building are they, if they were or just a small percentage was perhaps we wouldn't now be in division 4.
It never stopped Hoffman putting offers in for the club on several occasions in the past 5 years, what is stopping these others doing it? Maybe because their isn't any? Who knows.There would always be others. If SISU came out and said "CCFC is for sale" then I think we would see others interested.
Well we've got to build a team to gain those promotions and we'll be hamstrung with half of any money we make to build a better team going to SISU! I think it's madness but just my opinion, of course.
Who are all of the investors for these bids?
Who are SISU's investors? Let's ask that question first considering they're the ones gaining from our club..Who are all of the investors for these bids?
Who are SISU's investors? Let's ask that question first considering they're the ones gaining from our club..
But more fans are likely to get behind the club which might offset what Sisu will need to be given.
The club under Sisu is in decline they are still trying to get to the bottom of the cycle. If you think its madness then you must think Sisu can turn it around?
Will season tickets be up next season?
It never stopped Hoffman putting offers in for the club on several occasions in the past 5 years, what is stopping these others doing it? Maybe because their isn't any? Who knows.
Why should they disclose themselves at this moment in time, and while we are at it who are the sisu investors?Good point. If there's 7 investors then who are the other 6?
Because SkyBlueTalk want answers!Why should they disclose themselves at this moment in time, and while we are at it who are the sisu investors?
Why should they disclose themselves at this moment in time, and while we are at it who are the sisu investors?
Because SkyBlueTalk want answers!
You're not going to know the investors whilst bids are being prepared are you? I look at it this way Nick, how can it get any worse than SISU?That doesn't really answer it, you missed my point. Also, using what SISU do as an example when talking about any potential new owners is a bad sign.
Don't see the issue, we don't know who SISU investors are and never will, we do know who some of the Hoff investors are and should we find out the others (hope & expect so) the situation will be a great deal more transparent than at present.Who are all of the investors for these bids?
Why should they disclose themselves at this moment in time, and while we are at it who are the sisu investors?
I find it hard to work out why some of our fans are against the idea of a consortium of City fans attempting to buy out Sisu. It really is bizarre.
How can you talk about transparency when they are only just trying to save our club? SISU have had nearly 10 years to be transparent about it, do you think Hoff will do the same, or just presuming so?Or because you said they were transparent as a difference to SISU, then in reply used SISU to justify it.
Don't we want it to be as best as can possibly be?You're not going to know the investors whilst bids are being prepared are you? I look at it this way Nick, how can it get any worse than SISU?
I find it hard to work out why some of our fans are against the idea of a consortium of City fans attempting to buy out Sisu. It really is bizarre.
It's not an either / orBizarre is maybe putting it a bit strong but if the choice boils down to
(a) continuing with an owner who doesn't care about football and doesn't invest
or
(b) a consortium of City fans who want us to do well
doesn't seem too tricky which to opt for
How can you talk about transparency when they are only just trying to save our club? SISU have had nearly 10 years to be transparent about it, do you think Hoff will do the same, or just presuming so?
Being rid of SISU is the best it can possibly be, like I've said, how can it possibly get worse than SISU? I'm a gambling man, I would risk new owners over SISU on every chance I could get. We know the direction with SISU, what we don't know is where they're leading us too.Don't we want it to be as best as can possibly be?
Give them chance then to obtain this club, then we can start asking the transparency questions.No, I am saying they aren't very transparent also at this moment in time. Justifying it because SISU aren't doesn't work, we should want any new owner to be the opposite and not even comparable on any level.
It is you presuming.
Let's hope he does make an offer they can't refuse and everything is run completely different.
Of course they should be questioned as to their intentions, as should any perspective or current owners.I don't think anyone is against it, are they? It's the old not allowed to question GH, isn't it?
I look forward to the Assad/ISIS coalition then.Being rid of SISU is the best it can possibly be
Good point. If there's 7 investors then who are the other 6?
Completely swept over my head?I look forward to the Assad/ISIS coalition then.
Of course they should be questioned as to their intentions, as should any perspective or current owners.
An odd analogy, but a good thread keeper goerer NWI look forward to the Assad/ISIS coalition then.
Isn't it too fucking late by then? It would mean we have learned nothing from SISU. For all we know it might be Tim Fisher knowing he can't be the front man in this bid.Give them chance then to obtain this club, then we can start asking the transparency questions.
I have spoken to one or two that don'tI agree. I was just saying I disagree with your statement there are people on here who don't want the deal done.
Give them chance then to obtain this club, then we can start asking the transparency questions.
Want this particular deal done, or want a deal done as a general philosophy?I have spoken to one or two that don't
I have spoken to one or two that don't
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?