CJ on the Brinner got threatened thread, and some other dickhead a few weeks ago as well(Can't remember who that was though).
there was no personal abuse towards fisher tonight, apart from the personal abuse that came out of fishers own mouth.
Well nothing like that was said and plenty of witnesses.
Well nothing like that was said and plenty of witnesses.
Am careful what i wish for...so glad turned down chance to go on jim'll fix it years ago!!!!The thing is - if he goes...who next? The might get some real headache in who has closed businesses down in the face of much worse than TF is getting from some quarters. Some of these people actually get-off on riling large groups of dissenters up into a frenzy & STILL just getting on with their job. Be careful what you wish for!
why are people saying we need to be nice to tim
Formany on here(judging by time people spend on here) ccfc is like a family member
sisu and tim are killing ccfc - they should not be allowed to do this without is at least protecting our club
agreed- it is nothing to do with his family - but if he is going to spout such controversial , threatening stuff about our club - he has got to expect the same back
You don't have to be personal.
You can protest the issues, not the man.
I can see where you're coming from here, but I think it's not unreasonable to expect a decent standard of behaviour from those paid to represent the club.
If you were there and TF behaved like this towards you, with no good reason, then I think you'd feel upset too.
Having said that, some of the personal stuff about TF is way OTT. I dislike what he's doing to our club intensely, but it's nothing to do with his wife, kids, dog, car or how fat he is (or possibly, isn't).
Once you get into the personal stuff, then it tends to diminish rather than strengthen your argument, imho.
Well, once people start showing a decent standard of behaviour on here then maybe it will have a knock on effect. Look at the personal abuse thrown at Fisher, Linnell, etc.
As I said many on here are happy to throw insults and abuse at people then react like hysterical schoolgirls if the person they abuse bites back. They're human. I think some on here forget that Fisher, Linnell etc are real people not just names.
That is true but he started with the angry remarks then in the next breath he said we need to talk like Adults!!!
First you need to act like an adult to get the same in return......
Well, once people start showing a decent standard of behaviour on here then maybe it will have a knock on effect. Look at the personal abuse thrown at Fisher, Linnell, etc.
As I said many on here are happy to throw insults and abuse at people then react like hysterical schoolgirls if the person they abuse bites back. They're human. I think some on here forget that Fisher, Linnell etc are real people not just names.
I wish I was as hard as you.
FWIW, if TF's got a gripe like that, it would make more sense to refer it to the police than throw out accusations in front of all and sundry. Malicious Communications Act covers this sort of thing, as I recall.
Brinner's human too. You can't tell me you'd be happy if TF walked across and accused you of sending abusive texts to him, this in front of a load of other people. It's not behaving like a "hysterical schoolgirl" to complain about that sort of behaviour. TF should know better.
FWIW, if TF's got a gripe like that, it would make more sense to refer it to the police than throw out accusations in front of all and sundry. Malicious Communications Act covers this sort of thing, as I recall.
Guess you'll find out if you do go to Rainbows and then do suddenly become hard.
So 99% of people can here can't complain when they get shit then.
Read my post not what I said
he started on the offensive shouting but then said we should all be Adults.
He never came across like that himself
I would walk away. Then hunt down the cunts who threaten to involve my wife & kids and rip their balls off.
Anybody doing that deserves a court injunction on their record - despicable behaviour. I hope nobody on this forum has played any part. If they have - shame on them!!!
I think his point is, expect Fisher to behave perfectly is fine, but there's a responsibility in all of us to do the same wherever, be it in person or on here.
And if we don't we lose the right to complain.
I strongly disagree with attacking the person. He's just trying to do his job and he's got an utter shit one. Just imagine what effect this is having on his home life, his family's life. I mean, I love this club as much as the next man and I don't agree with any of SISU's recent proposal's. But I wouldn't wish that on anyone. And if we don't attack him, he can't attack us in return. Let's be adults.
Instead, attack the policies of SISU he is being made to spout. And if he ignores you, or you can't get through to him, then you need to improve the message and quality of the protest, not the volume. We had a controversial politician speak at my University and the 200 angry protesters outside did nothing to stop him speaking, but our questions destroyed his position and made him back peddle like a cyclist who just found himself on the ring road. We need to leave emotion at the door when dealing with them; anger and knee jerk reactions will only make things worse. We need to engage them in conversation and show why we think this is a terrible idea and back it up with some sort of evidence, because god knows how many people they've got working trying to prove it is a good one. Use the consultations to consult and get our position, as fans, across in an intelligent, concise way.
And remember, there's a reason we wear the Phoenix over our hearts in this city.
I can see where you're coming from here, but I think it's not unreasonable to expect a decent standard of behaviour from those paid to represent the club.
If you were there and TF behaved like this towards you, with no good reason, then I think you'd feel upset too.
Having said that, some of the personal stuff about TF is way OTT. I dislike what he's doing to our club intensely, but it's nothing to do with his wife, kids, dog, car or how fat he is (or possibly, isn't).
Once you get into the personal stuff, then it tends to diminish rather than strengthen your argument, imho.
I strongly disagree with attacking the person. He's just trying to do his job and he's got an utter shit one. Just imagine what effect this is having on his home life, his family's life. I mean, I love this club as much as the next man and I don't agree with any of SISU's recent proposal's. But I wouldn't wish that on anyone. And if we don't attack him, he can't attack us in return. Let's be adults.
Instead, attack the policies of SISU he is being made to spout. And if he ignores you, or you can't get through to him, then you need to improve the message and quality of the protest, not the volume. We had a controversial politician speak at my University and the 200 angry protesters outside did nothing to stop him speaking, but our questions destroyed his position and made him back peddle like a cyclist who just found himself on the ring road. We need to leave emotion at the door when dealing with them; anger and knee jerk reactions will only make things worse. We need to engage them in conversation and show why we think this is a terrible idea and back it up with some sort of evidence, because god knows how many people they've got working trying to prove it is a good one. Use the consultations to consult and get our position, as fans, across in an intelligent, concise way.
And remember, there's a reason we wear the Phoenix over our hearts in this city.
Seems that those threats are mainly mentioned in this thread and saying they're a bad thing! Can somebody please tell me whether there have been new threats, this week? If there have, fine, it's completely out of order, but it mostly seems to be conjecture and bluster over something somebody invoked from months ago on here to try and make a point!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?