I am sure it is a mixture of people who go every week and people who don't go. Who say the negative things.
It doesn't matter to me whether they go or not. What annoys me is this bull###t that some how Coventry is any different to any other club and hence have worse fans.
It's just not correct
It's like when people slag off the city itself.
I have been to the majority of the cities in the UK.
Coventry as a city is just average. There are better cities out there and there are far more worse cities.
It is certainly not the s##thole that some make out.
If you listen to some you would think it is one of the worse cities in the country.
Negative self perpetuating crap
I am sure it is a mixture of people who go every week and people who don't go. Who say the negative things.
It doesn't matter to me whether they go or not. What annoys me is this bull###t that some how Coventry is any different to any other club and hence have worse fans.
It's just not correct
It's like when people slag off the city itself.
I have been to the majority of the cities in the UK.
Coventry as a city is just average. There are better cities out there and there are far more worse cities.
It is certainly not the s##thole that some make out.
If you listen to some you would think it is one of the worse cities in the country.
Negative self perpetuating crap
What makes Coventry different to similar cities like Leicester and Southampton where you'd argue they support their local team better?
Investment from the owners...
I think the difference was when they went down the owners did everything in their power to get them out of the league ASAP - in the right direction, that is UP to the championship not down to L2. What did ours do? Started a massive row with ACL, CCC. Higgs Charity, fans, lost a good manager in Robins, then took us to Northampton. I think getting as many as we do is testament to how good, in fact how GREAT some of our fans are.
I still have not forgiven SISU and if they want me back, either give me some hope that CCFC has regained some ambition, and start to act like a football club, not school kids, or pee off!
Absolutely spot on - we have owners who appear hell bent on destroying the club. In the minds of long suffering city fans who don't go any more this is what the problem is and it is unique to our club - whether this is true or not isn't the issue, but it is why they don't go any more.
Surely whether it is true or not should be an issue though?
I could go say I am going to refuse to go because I was once scouted by the club to play up front and was just about to make my debut and SISU refused to pay me 30k a week so I cancelled. It isn't true though, but it is my reason.
I don't think we are going silly all out, but we have had a decent budget for the league a couple of years running now and now a decent manager. Who knows what the budget would be if we had 10,000 season tickets instead of 5,000?
People don't go to support the owners, they go to support the team, the manager, the badge.
Tbf dongon saying we are average is probably the most sensible thing he has has said in the last 6 months, there are a lot of teams better than us in terms of support, success and position and there are also quite a few teams worse than us. Average out of 92 clubs would roughly be 40-55 position which essentially puts us as a bottom half championship club/ strong league 1 club which I think is about right now for where we should be.
It's those who have delusions of grandeur and believe we are a natural premier club/sleeping giant/great club that need a reality check, in the context of English football we're not.
Well that isn't true. Over time we are the 20th best supported team in the country with the table I'm looking at. Probably dropped a few places now though cause it was made in 2012 and our attendances haven't been high since then.
So what do you say to that? It's pointless comparing now, you're comparing us at our lowest position in our existence (losing to Worcester and near relegation to L2) to teams who have had far more success and entertainment recently.
It's not the lowest point in our existence.
Well it would have been for many fans. Tell me when there was a lower point then?
Well that isn't true. Over time we are the 20th best supported team in the country with the table I'm looking at. Probably dropped a few places now though cause it was made in 2012 and our attendances haven't been high since then.
So what do you say to that? It's pointless comparing now, you're comparing us at our lowest position in our existence (losing to Worcester and near relegation to L2) to teams who have had far more success and entertainment recently.
It's not the lowest point in our existence.
I've been going since 1975 and it's easily the lowest , but you are probably right if we go back further. Care to tell us ?
We spent a year in Div 4 - also the long stay in the top flight distorts the natural position.
Average crowds are a distortion factoring it in. It's like saying over time Huddersfield and PNE are huge clubs - now they are not.
...I think you need your horse pills at this point.
Whilst I agree it is not the lowest point in terms of league position I do think that last season was the lowest point in terms of quality and in terms of the gulf between club and fans.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well my father, who has been going for much longer than me...and you unless you watched them in the 1940s was so upset and disillusioned by the plight of the club over the last few years. Unfortunately he died the week after the club announced they were coming back to the Ricoh. So didn't witness the debacle that almost saw us relagayed. And yes he saw them in div 3 n&s, doc 4 etc etc. his judgement on the Sky Blues. His view that the club had never been so low is one I would believe after his 70 plus years of following his beloved club.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not really - just pointing out the facts. I think it's you having difficulty swallowing the truth.
Fair enough.
However, Most historians suggest the low point was a humiliating defeat to Kings Lynn and a subsequent relegation to the bottom tier of football.
As for quality that's a relative and irrelevant, subjective factor. If the team that lined up two seasons ago competed against the team in Goulds second season as manager I would say the sixfield 11 would beat that team far more times than they'd lose.
As for gulf with fans again subjective. Hill, who of course came in at the low ebb, was vilified as a chairman and "kill kill kill Jimmy Hill" rang from the terraces.
There was a very difficult year in the early 80's when players were openly abused in a defeat (against Ipswich I think) and one player had to flee from the ground after abuse from fans.
So, how many season tickets have we sold then?
Some.
[/QUOTE]It was my dad that got me up to HR and he watched over 1000 games over 57 years. He was at the 63 Sunderland game, Wolves 67 and Wembley 87. Unfortunately in his latter years he had dementia and couldn't remember the modern team; but some old players and games still lit a faint happy memory.
I took my son and one of my daughters (whose favourite player was Hadji; her signed shirt is framed and on show in her house). She has since took her daughter. Sixfields was the final straw.
CCFC was always about the team, the fans, and feeling part of the community; Hell we WERE the community.
Hope TM can bring a little of those pleasurable times we used to have. Winning games would be nice, but bringing pride back would be better. I cant attend anymore, but in my heart I'm still at Filbert St, Moulineux, Upton Park 2nd leg, Old Trafford singing "We came in a taxi". Tough times on the terraces and getting home. Wembley; leaving my pregnant wife with 2 kids in tow at Gatwick, flying to Majorca that night and being the only City fan on the Gatwick express after the game.
Really hoping for an improvement this year. Wish I could be there. My head says 11th or 12th this year; my heart says 90+ points promotion. Good luck TM. PUSB
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You win my award of the day for that remark. That's one of the funniest things I've read in ages. :claping hands:
Fair enough.
However, Most historians suggest the low point was a humiliating defeat to Kings Lynn and a subsequent relegation to the bottom tier of football.
As for quality that's a relative and irrelevant, subjective factor. If the team that lined up two seasons ago competed against the team in Goulds second season as manager I would say the sixfield 11 would beat that team far more times than they'd lose.
As for gulf with fans again subjective. Hill, who of course came in at the low ebb, was vilified as a chairman and "kill kill kill Jimmy Hill" rang from the terraces.
There was a very difficult year in the early 80's when players were openly abused in a defeat (against Ipswich I think) and one player had to flee from the ground after abuse from fans.
Didn't Goulds teams spank liverpool during both his stint's as manager when Liverpool were leading the table?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?